国民收入论与生产劳动:服务商品的价值虚构

发布时间：2018-05-01 21:46

本文选题：生产劳动 + 服务的虚构价值　；参考：《当代经济研究》2017年09期

【摘要】："什么是生产性劳动"这个问题已经困扰了日本学界70余年,其肇始于"国民收入与生产劳动"的关系论争,并先后经历了"服务劳动是否创造价值","一切劳动都是服务劳动吗"等论战。造成这一论争的根本原因是资本的神秘化导致的国民收入论潜藏的分配论的错误,即对社会而言本来是非生产性的劳动却被个别资本家看作是生产劳动。而且,这一观念造成了国民收入论的两大不合理性,其将交换层面的范畴当作了生产范畴,从而将不创造价值的经济活动获得的收入当成了价值的来源,这助长了建立在"三位一体公式"基础上的庸俗经济学的神秘化理念。正是因为不创造价值的经济活动在分配层面上获得了收入,所以本来不创造价值的商业劳动和保险劳动等被当作了创造价值的劳动,分配的逻辑导致了生产逻辑的神秘化。
[Abstract]:"What is productive labor" has plagued the Japanese academic circle for more than 70 years. It began in the debate on the relationship between "national income and production labor", and has experienced the controversy of "whether service labor creates value" and "all labor is service labor". The root cause of this controversy is the national collection caused by the mystifying of capital. The mistake of the latent distributive theory, that is, the original non productive labor for the society is regarded as productive labor by individual capitalists. Moreover, this concept causes the two unrationality of the theory of national income, which regards the category of the exchange level as the category of production, thus making the income of the economic activities that do not create value as the income. The source of value contributes to the mystifying of the vulgar economics established on the basis of the "Trinity Formula". It is precisely because the economic activity that does not create value gains income at the level of distribution, so the commercial labor and insurance labor, which did not create value, are regarded as the labor of creating value, and the logic of distribution leads to The mystifying of the logic of production.

【作者单位】：日本国一桥大学;
【分类号】：F014

【相似文献】