现代经济学的“看见”和“看不见”

发布时间：2018-06-24 03:55

本文选题：破窗谬误 + 社会达尔文主义　；参考：《学术研究》2017年09期

【摘要】：现代主流经济学存在明显的"破窗谬误":不仅对社会中的不人道、不伦理以及不合理现象熟视无睹,而且基于特定逻辑为之辩护。究其原因,就在于现代主流经济学的认知思维和分析方法:一方面,根基于自然主义思维及其衍生的社会达尔文主义和肯定性理性,它崇尚基于力量博弈的纯粹市场机制,倾向于接受并合理化社会现状,从而必然无法发现和解决现实社会中的问题;另一方面,根基于自然科学哲学及其衍生的个人主义和还原主义方法,它崇尚基于局部均衡的理性选择框架,倾向于对孤立行为和现象进行成本—收益分析,从而无法看到社会整体利益和长期利益。尤其是,随着经济学帝国主义的扩张,现代主流经济学的分析思维被运用到更为广泛的社会生活领域,"破窗谬误"就越来越凸显。究其原因,社会生活现象受到复杂社会性因素的影响更大,从而孤立的成本—收益分析所潜含的狭隘性也就更为严重。
[Abstract]:There is a clear "broken window fallacy" in modern mainstream economics: not only to ignore inhumanity, unethical and irrational phenomena in society, but also to defend it based on specific logic. The reason lies in the cognitive thinking and analysis methods of modern mainstream economics: on the one hand, the root is based on naturalistic thinking and its derived society. Ervinism and affirmative rationality, which advocate a pure market mechanism based on power game, tend to accept and rationalize social status, and thus inevitably fail to find and solve problems in real society; on the other hand, it advocates based on local equilibrium based on the philosophy of natural science and its derived individualism and reductionism. The rational choice frame tends to carry on the cost-benefit analysis of the isolated behavior and phenomenon, and thus can not see the whole social interests and long-term interests. In particular, with the expansion of economic imperialism, the analytical thinking of modern mainstream economics has been applied to a wider community of social life, and the "broken window fallacy" is becoming more and more prominent. The reason is that the social life phenomenon is more influenced by the complex social factors, and thus the narrowness of the isolated cost-benefit analysis is even more serious.
【作者单位】：中山大学岭南学院;中央财经大学经济学院中国政治经济学研究中心;
【基金】：广东省创新团队项目“社会主义市场经济理论基础与政策体系”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F091.3

【相似文献】