中国社会主义市场经济与当代国外市场社会主义之比较
发布时间：2018-07-17 01:19
【摘要】： 在国内外理论界普遍存在一种有偏颇的现象，许多论者常常把中国社会主义市场经济与国外市场社会主义简单地等同起来，应当指出，中国社会主义市场经济与国外市场社会主义虽然有诸多的联系和相通之处，但两者在政治制度保障、经济制度特征和社会文化结构等方面都存在重大的区别。因此，我们反对把两者简单等同的做法，本文的主要任务是：通过对基本经济制度和经济运行机制等五个方面的比较分析，阐明中国社会主义市场经济和当代国外市场社会主义之间存在的重大区别。第一章从理论渊源进行比较。传统的市场社会主义主要渊源于当时的一些社会主义改良思想和西方经济学中的资源配置理论。而当代市场社会主义是在继承传统市场社会主义理论成果的基础上，运用现代西方经济学的最新理论成果和方法，探索市场社会主义理论新构架和新模式。中国社会主义市场经济理论则来源于中国改革开放的实践，是科学社会主义的理论创新。第二章，分析了二者对“什么是社会主义”这个首要问题的不同认识。追求社会公正是二者共同的价值取向，但在社会主义的本质和目标上各有侧重。当代国外市场社会主义由于本身只是一种资本主义改良模式，因而大都把实现平等看作社会主义的本质，以增进社会福利作为最大目标。而中国社会主义市场经济则侧重于在社会主义的初级阶段大力发展生产力，并为最终实现全国人民的共同富裕而奋斗。第三章，比较了二者在所有制理论方面的区别。当代国外市场社会主义不把公有制作为社会主义的一个基本经济制度特征，只是把它当作实现社会主义目标的一种手段，并以“社会所有制”取代传统意义上的公有制，主张各种所有制成分地位平等、互相竞争。而中国社会主义市场经济则把公有制作为社会主义的一个基本原则，坚持以公有制为主体、多种经济成分共同发展。该章还着重分析了双方在股份制和股份合作制这两种公有制经济实现形式上的不同内容。第四章，分析了双方在收入分配理论方面的异同。当代国外市场社会主义追求个人收入分配的平等，主张对收入分配过程进行民主控制，，经济剩余归劳动者所有，个人拥有国民收入的大部分。中国社会主义市场经济则强调效率优先、兼顾公平，收入分配市场化，按劳分配为主与按生产要素分配相结合，兼顾各方利益。第五章，分析了双方在宏观调控方面的区别。当代国外市场社会主义认为政府的作用体现在对市场失灵的补充上，对经济社会的调控主要集中在利润分配和社会投资等局部方面。而在中国社会主义市场经济中，政府是一个重要的市场主体，对包括经济总量平衡和经济结构优化在内的经济社会进行全方位的调控。第六章在前面五章比较分析的基础上作出结论性的概括，并对当代国外市场社会主义进行了简要评价。
[Abstract]:There is a phenomenon of bias in the theoretical circles at home and abroad. Many commentators often equate Chinese socialist market economy with foreign market socialism, which should be pointed out. Although there are many connections and similarities between Chinese socialist market economy and foreign market socialism, there are significant differences in political system guarantee, economic system characteristics and social and cultural structure between them. Therefore, we oppose the simple equivalence of the two. The main task of this paper is to compare and analyze the basic economic system and the economic operation mechanism. This paper expounds the major differences between Chinese socialist market economy and contemporary foreign market socialism. The first chapter compares the theoretical origin. The traditional market socialism is mainly derived from the thought of socialist improvement at that time and the theory of resource allocation in western economics. On the basis of inheriting the theoretical achievements of traditional market socialism, contemporary market socialism explores the new framework and mode of market socialism theory by using the latest theoretical achievements and methods of modern western economics. The theory of Chinese socialist market economy comes from the practice of China's reform and opening up and is the theoretical innovation of scientific socialism. In the second chapter, the author analyzes their different understanding of "what is socialism". The pursuit of social justice is their common value orientation, but they have different emphases on the essence and goal of socialism. The contemporary foreign market socialism is only a kind of capitalist reform mode, so it regards the realization of equality as the essence of socialism and takes the promotion of social welfare as the biggest goal. China's socialist market economy focuses on developing productive forces in the primary stage of socialism and striving for the ultimate realization of the common prosperity of the people of the whole country. The third chapter compares the differences between the two in ownership theory. Contemporary foreign market socialism does not regard public ownership as a basic characteristic of socialist economic system, but only regards it as a means to achieve socialist objectives, and replaces traditional public ownership with "social ownership". Advocate all kinds of ownership element equal status, compete with each other. China's socialist market economy regards public ownership as a basic principle of socialism, insists on taking public ownership as the main body and develops together with various economic components. This chapter also analyzes the different contents of the two kinds of public ownership economy in the joint-stock system and the share-share cooperation system. Chapter four analyzes the similarities and differences between the two sides in the theory of income distribution. Contemporary foreign market socialism pursues the equality of individual income distribution, advocates democratic control over the process of income distribution, the surplus of economy belongs to the laborer, and the individual owns most of the national income. China's socialist market economy emphasizes the priority of efficiency, fairness, marketization of income distribution, combining distribution according to work with distribution according to factors of production, taking into account the interests of all parties. The fifth chapter analyzes the differences between the two sides in macro-control. Contemporary foreign market socialism believes that the role of the government is reflected in the supplement to the market failure, and the economic and social regulation and control mainly focus on profit distribution and social investment and other local aspects. In China's socialist market economy, the government is an important market subject, including the balance of economic aggregate and the optimization of economic structure to carry out all-round economic and social control. The sixth chapter makes a conclusion on the basis of comparative analysis of the previous five chapters, and gives a brief evaluation of contemporary foreign market socialism.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2001
【分类号】：F04-03
本文编号：2128397
[Abstract]:There is a phenomenon of bias in the theoretical circles at home and abroad. Many commentators often equate Chinese socialist market economy with foreign market socialism, which should be pointed out. Although there are many connections and similarities between Chinese socialist market economy and foreign market socialism, there are significant differences in political system guarantee, economic system characteristics and social and cultural structure between them. Therefore, we oppose the simple equivalence of the two. The main task of this paper is to compare and analyze the basic economic system and the economic operation mechanism. This paper expounds the major differences between Chinese socialist market economy and contemporary foreign market socialism. The first chapter compares the theoretical origin. The traditional market socialism is mainly derived from the thought of socialist improvement at that time and the theory of resource allocation in western economics. On the basis of inheriting the theoretical achievements of traditional market socialism, contemporary market socialism explores the new framework and mode of market socialism theory by using the latest theoretical achievements and methods of modern western economics. The theory of Chinese socialist market economy comes from the practice of China's reform and opening up and is the theoretical innovation of scientific socialism. In the second chapter, the author analyzes their different understanding of "what is socialism". The pursuit of social justice is their common value orientation, but they have different emphases on the essence and goal of socialism. The contemporary foreign market socialism is only a kind of capitalist reform mode, so it regards the realization of equality as the essence of socialism and takes the promotion of social welfare as the biggest goal. China's socialist market economy focuses on developing productive forces in the primary stage of socialism and striving for the ultimate realization of the common prosperity of the people of the whole country. The third chapter compares the differences between the two in ownership theory. Contemporary foreign market socialism does not regard public ownership as a basic characteristic of socialist economic system, but only regards it as a means to achieve socialist objectives, and replaces traditional public ownership with "social ownership". Advocate all kinds of ownership element equal status, compete with each other. China's socialist market economy regards public ownership as a basic principle of socialism, insists on taking public ownership as the main body and develops together with various economic components. This chapter also analyzes the different contents of the two kinds of public ownership economy in the joint-stock system and the share-share cooperation system. Chapter four analyzes the similarities and differences between the two sides in the theory of income distribution. Contemporary foreign market socialism pursues the equality of individual income distribution, advocates democratic control over the process of income distribution, the surplus of economy belongs to the laborer, and the individual owns most of the national income. China's socialist market economy emphasizes the priority of efficiency, fairness, marketization of income distribution, combining distribution according to work with distribution according to factors of production, taking into account the interests of all parties. The fifth chapter analyzes the differences between the two sides in macro-control. Contemporary foreign market socialism believes that the role of the government is reflected in the supplement to the market failure, and the economic and social regulation and control mainly focus on profit distribution and social investment and other local aspects. In China's socialist market economy, the government is an important market subject, including the balance of economic aggregate and the optimization of economic structure to carry out all-round economic and social control. The sixth chapter makes a conclusion on the basis of comparative analysis of the previous five chapters, and gives a brief evaluation of contemporary foreign market socialism.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2001
【分类号】：F04-03
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 王影;;西方市场社会主义对完善我国市场经济体制的启示[J];特区经济;2011年09期
本文编号：2128397
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2128397.html
