正义视角下的帕累托效率
发布时间：2018-07-20 15:07
【摘要】：如果严格按照个体的偏好状况来定义,帕累托效率本身并无规范含义。它之所以能够成为经济学实证分析最重要的价值标准,主要是因为它源自功利主义这一伦理学理论。帕累托原则作为弱化了的功利主义才有可能把个体偏好的满足理解为客观的善,但是它认为善优先于正义,因此违背了自由主义政治哲学的中立性和正义优先于善的原则,没有把社会看成不同个体之间的合作体系,仍然把人当成手段而不是目的来看待。同时,帕累托原则由于忽视了正义的优先性,也就忽略了偏好的内容与来源等问题,误以为所有偏好都是值得满足的。但是在正义的视角下,重要的事情并不是满足现有的偏好,而是在正义的基本结构下形成偏好,从而消除对偏好的扭曲。帕累托原则忽略了实现正义这一政府的首要职能。
[Abstract]:Pareto efficiency itself has no normative meaning if defined strictly according to individual preferences. It can become the most important value standard in the empirical analysis of economics, mainly because it originates from utilitarianism, an ethical theory. Pareto principle, as a weakened utilitarianism, may regard the satisfaction of individual preferences as objective good, but it thinks that good takes precedence over justice, which violates the neutrality of liberal political philosophy and the principle that justice takes precedence over good. Society is not seen as a system of cooperation between different individuals, but as a means rather than an end. At the same time, Pareto principle neglects the priority of justice and neglects the content and source of preference. But from the perspective of justice, the important thing is not to satisfy the existing preferences, but to form preferences under the basic structure of justice, thus eliminating the distortion of preferences. The Pareto principle ignores the primary function of the government to achieve justice.
【作者单位】： 北京化工大学经济管理学院;
【分类号】：F091.3
本文编号：2133922
[Abstract]:Pareto efficiency itself has no normative meaning if defined strictly according to individual preferences. It can become the most important value standard in the empirical analysis of economics, mainly because it originates from utilitarianism, an ethical theory. Pareto principle, as a weakened utilitarianism, may regard the satisfaction of individual preferences as objective good, but it thinks that good takes precedence over justice, which violates the neutrality of liberal political philosophy and the principle that justice takes precedence over good. Society is not seen as a system of cooperation between different individuals, but as a means rather than an end. At the same time, Pareto principle neglects the priority of justice and neglects the content and source of preference. But from the perspective of justice, the important thing is not to satisfy the existing preferences, but to form preferences under the basic structure of justice, thus eliminating the distortion of preferences. The Pareto principle ignores the primary function of the government to achieve justice.
【作者单位】： 北京化工大学经济管理学院;
【分类号】：F091.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何建华;论经济正义[J];中共浙江省委党校学报;2002年04期
2 何建华;论经济正义的凸现[J];中共浙江省委党校学报;2004年06期
3 郑永奎;;经济正义与人的发展的理性思考[J];世纪论评;1998年03期
4 马坤;经济正义的向度:效益和秩序[J];南京政治学院学报;2002年04期
5 郑永奎;经济正义是人的本质的内在要求[J];经济纵横;2004年10期
6 高秀荣;;90年代以来我国经济正义研究的综述[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2006年12期
7 宋瑞霞;;论代内正义的环境与代内正义问题[J];当代社科视野;2009年01期
8 柳平生;;马克思经济正义理论的当代中国解读[J];集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年03期
9 王代月;;马克思的劳动正义理论及现实价值研究[J];思想战线;2010年01期
10 康子兴;;商业社会与正义:亚当·斯密的正义理论[J];湖南社会科学;2010年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 郑永奎;简论“经济正义”[N];光明日报;2001年
，本文编号：2133922
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2133922.html
