现代西方两大哲学思潮对西方经济学方法论的影响
[Abstract]:In the long river of human history, the relationship between philosophy and economics is close and universal, in which methodology is one of the bridges that link the two. Philosophy, as the essence of the spirit of the times, should pay attention to economics and provide the guidance of world outlook and methodology for economics, and economics without philosophical basis is not a complete economics. In the same way, the economy should provide rich nourishment for philosophy, and promote the formation of economic thought and the construction of economic theory through economic methodology. The interaction and infiltration of philosophy and Economics on the methodology level promoted the common development of the two major disciplines.
In the middle of the nineteenth Century, the thought of scientism and humanism in the capitalist society had laid a solid philosophical foundation for the formation of western economic methodology, and had a wide and profound influence on the neoclassical economics and contemporary western economics, especially in the case of logical positivism, falsification and historical owners. Under the influence of the philosophy of science, the methodology of economics has developed a complete set of analytical framework and tools. The basic feature is the logical deduction method based on the hypothesis of "rational man", which is based on the hypothesis of "rational man". The most outstanding performance is the extensive application of Mathematics in economics and is becoming more precise and extensive. In the final analysis, the reason why economics is called "the Pearl of the crown of social science" is, in the final analysis, because it is more thorough in the theoretical construction and study of the requirements of methodology in theoretical construction and research than in other social disciplines. But all of these are complicated and uncertain in the current economic world. The impact and challenge of sexual and accidental events. Although economics is a discussion about the relationship of interest, it is a discussion of the relationship of people's interests. Therefore, economists can not have no humanistic care without the necessary sense of social responsibility. All the famous economists in the history of thought have their own persistent economic philosophy and moral sentiment. In particular, the philosophical thought of humanism based on humanism and the methodology characterized by non rationalism are also responded to in the western mainstream and non mainstream economic methodology, and have a further influence on the development of western mainstream economics methodology. The rationalization and the rise of postmodernism lead to the integration of philosophy of science and humanistic philosophy in the same way, and then influence the western economic methodology from the uniformed method of "Scientism" to pluralism, so that the economic methodology emphasizes human spirit and calls for humanistic care at the same time with rational empirical methodology.
A number of empirical studies have shown that the two major philosophical thoughts in the modern West have fully demonstrated their tension in the revolution of economic paradigm in the aspects of positivist criticism and humanism criticism. Therefore, the author believes that the way to understand the methodology of economics lies in the use of philosophical ideas, thinking, methods, and economic methodology. Based on this understanding, this article mainly analyzes the influence and effect of the two western philosophies of thought: the ideological trend of scientism and humanism on the formation and development of various western economic thought theories and methods, combing the history of the changes of economic methodology caused by the changes of the two western philosophies of thought, and thus criticizing it. Absorb and draw lessons from the research methodology system of western economics.
China's economic problems have entered into the further development of the methodology of Chinese economics for the purpose of building a society with Chinese characteristics.
To serve the market economy.
【学位授予单位】:武汉科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2002
【分类号】:F011
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈英;从证实到证伪:对西方经济学方法论的反思[J];天津社会科学;1997年01期
2 王一妍;;《资本论》方法论与西方经济学方法论的比较[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
3 于冠华;西方经济学方法论的逻辑演进[J];理论与现代化;2002年05期
4 李和平;研究纲领与西方经济学方法论[J];自然辩证法研究;2003年02期
5 蔡仲;现代西方经济学方法论中的证伪主义[J];自然辩证法研究;1998年11期
6 余东华,赵梦涵;论古典经济哲学方法的分化:西方经济学方法论与马克思经济哲学方法[J];山东社会科学;2004年02期
7 贾孝敏,刘剑;波普尔证伪主义与西方经济学方法论[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2004年05期
8 李仁君;经济学方法论比较研究[J];北京行政学院学报;2000年03期
9 傅耀,颜鹏飞;西方经济学方法论的演变和最新发展[J];国外社会科学;2003年02期
10 ;丛明博士[J];涉外税务;1997年12期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 汪永康;;杜威:形而上学的批判与改造[A];全国“形而上学与反形而上学”学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
2 张友谊;;以人为本:治国理念的创新与飞跃[A];新中国人学理路——第十一届全国人学研讨会文集[C];2009年
3 杨权利;祝秀垒;;论青年马克思的人本主义思想[A];马克思主义探原——马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》研究文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 王锐生;回答以人为本研究中的几个问题[N];北京日报;2004年
2 江怡(中国社科院哲学所);谁能读懂维特根斯坦[N];中国图书商报;2003年
3 姚裕群;现代人力资源开发与管理的六大特征[N];中国企业报;2003年
4 姚炜;青年马克思的“跨越”思想[N];社会科学报;2001年
5 中国社科院 靳辉明;驳“恩格斯宣布放弃共产主义理论”谬说[N];光明日报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 王一妍;《资本论》方法论研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
2 方贤绪;现代主义文学思潮和80年代小说研究[D];苏州大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陆勇;现代西方两大哲学思潮对西方经济学方法论的影响[D];武汉科技大学;2002年
2 余学玉;由理性向非理性过渡的桥梁[D];安徽大学;2002年
3 宋洁;鲁迅的生命体验和“人学”观念的现代转型[D];陕西师范大学;2004年
4 钟声震;基于以人为本理念的中学管理探讨[D];江西师范大学;2003年
5 刘圣福;以人为本的教师管理探析[D];曲阜师范大学;2004年
6 马妮;马克思主义哲学观的当代阐释[D];东北师范大学;2004年
7 韦肖;马克思分工理论及启示[D];苏州大学;2010年
8 彭美贵;从市民社会理论到异化劳动理论到科学的实践观[D];苏州大学;2002年
9 杨进;尊重的教育[D];东北师范大学;2002年
10 赵剑;基于人本主义理论的内部制衡理论探讨[D];中国海洋大学;2003年
本文编号:2158981
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2158981.html