凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》的学理价值

发布时间：2018-10-08 17:16

【摘要】：国内学术界对凡勃伦思想的研究大多强调其制度分析,忽略了其中更为突出的阶级分析。作为一个结构性概念,阶级分析占据主导的方法论地位,可以对许多制度现象作出合理的解释,而制度总体上是一种状态结果,是有待解释的,因而制度分析只是一种补充。澄清凡勃伦的方法论也蕴含了如何看待非马克思主义的阶级分析问题。将凡氏的阶级分析方法与马克思主义的阶级分析方法进行比较后发现,凡氏的阶级分析方法对马克思主义的阶级分析方法具有补充作用。因此,在坚持马克思主义基本原理与方法的基础上,适当吸收和借鉴非马克思主义的阶级分析,在非本质性的经济与社会现象的分析及相关概念工具的构建方面是必要的。
[Abstract]:Most of the studies on Veblen's thought in China emphasize its institutional analysis, ignoring the more prominent class analysis. As a structural concept, class analysis plays a leading role in methodology, and it can give a reasonable explanation to many institutional phenomena, while institution is a state result in general and needs to be explained, so institutional analysis is only a supplement. Clarifying Veblen's methodology also implies how to treat non-Marxist class analysis. By comparing Van's class analysis method with Marxist class analysis method, it is found that van's class analysis method is complementary to Marxist class analysis method. Therefore, on the basis of adhering to the basic principles and methods of Marxism, it is necessary to properly absorb and draw lessons from the class analysis of non-Marxism in the analysis of non-essential economic and social phenomena and the construction of related conceptual tools.
【作者单位】：湖南师范大学马克思主义学院;湖南师范大学公共管理学院;
【分类号】：F091.3

【相似文献】