德奥经济学方法论论战的历史澄清及当代启示
发布时间：2018-11-09 10:31
【摘要】：19世纪末20世纪初,奥地利学派同德国历史学派展开了一场经济学方法论大论战。门格尔和施穆勒的交锋集中体现了双方的分歧,深层次来看,这种分歧正是对于经济学学科性质不同理解的表现。目前我们对大论战有一定的误解和轻视。其实门格尔和施穆勒并非水火不容,最终也未分胜负。而且,大论战绝非历史的小插曲,当时其影响力远超所谓的"边际革命"。澄清大论战及大论战时代的原貌,为中国特色社会主义政治经济学构建提供了重要的方法论启示。只有牢牢把握经济学的本质——兼具科学性和人文性,在构建"一般性"的同时坚持历史维度,坚持中国主体性,才有可能做到"占据真理和道义的制高点"。
[Abstract]:At the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, the Austrian school and the German historical school launched a great debate on the methodology of economics. The confrontation between Mengar and Schmule embodies the differences between the two sides. In a deep sense, this divergence is the manifestation of the different understanding of the nature of economics. At present, we have a certain misunderstanding and contempt for the great controversy. In fact, Menger and Schmule are not incompatible, the final is not divided. Moreover, the controversy was by no means an interlude in history, when it was far more influential than the so-called marginal revolution. Clarifying the original appearance of the Great controversy and the era of the Great argument provides an important methodological enlightenment for the construction of the political economy with Chinese characteristics. Only by firmly grasping the essence of economics, which is both scientific and humanistic, can it be possible to "occupy the commanding heights of truth and morality" when we construct "generality" and adhere to the historical dimension and Chinese subjectivity at the same time.
【作者单位】： 东北财经大学马克思主义学院;东北财经大学经济学院;大连市行政学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“社会主义与市场经济深度融合研究”(2015YZD08) 辽宁省马克思主义学院重大研究方向立项“习近平治国理政经济战略思想研究”(L15ZDA003)
【分类号】：F091.34
本文编号：2320148
[Abstract]:At the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, the Austrian school and the German historical school launched a great debate on the methodology of economics. The confrontation between Mengar and Schmule embodies the differences between the two sides. In a deep sense, this divergence is the manifestation of the different understanding of the nature of economics. At present, we have a certain misunderstanding and contempt for the great controversy. In fact, Menger and Schmule are not incompatible, the final is not divided. Moreover, the controversy was by no means an interlude in history, when it was far more influential than the so-called marginal revolution. Clarifying the original appearance of the Great controversy and the era of the Great argument provides an important methodological enlightenment for the construction of the political economy with Chinese characteristics. Only by firmly grasping the essence of economics, which is both scientific and humanistic, can it be possible to "occupy the commanding heights of truth and morality" when we construct "generality" and adhere to the historical dimension and Chinese subjectivity at the same time.
【作者单位】： 东北财经大学马克思主义学院;东北财经大学经济学院;大连市行政学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“社会主义与市场经济深度融合研究”(2015YZD08) 辽宁省马克思主义学院重大研究方向立项“习近平治国理政经济战略思想研究”(L15ZDA003)
【分类号】：F091.34
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 方新民;“斯密问题”:作为“问题”如何不可能[J];经济问题探索;2001年09期
2 高德步;经济学中的历史学派和历史方法[J];中国人民大学学报;1998年05期
3 杨祖义;德国历史学派的经济史学解析[J];中南财经大学学报;2001年05期
4 左大培,杨帆,韩德强,杨斌;从历史学派和民族主义的角度看中国入世(笔谈)[J];开放导报;2000年09期
5 唐绍欣,孙黎娟;历史主义方法论与理性经济人假设[J];云南财贸学院学报;2003年04期
6 胡明;;历史学派与德国特殊发展道路[J];德国研究;2008年03期
7 汤在新;论历史学派[J];经济评论;1991年02期
8 左振;;论李斯特与历史学派经济思想对我国现阶段经济发展的启示[J];品牌(下半月);2012年06期
9 关永强;张东刚;;英国经济学的演变与经济史学的形成(1870—1940)[J];中国社会科学;2014年04期
10 杨耀坤;研究科学发现问题由热到冷的反思[J];自然辩证法通讯;1999年06期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李晓华;当代俄罗斯国际关系学的现实主义系统—历史学派研究[D];外交学院;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 蒋宁;演绎还是归纳[D];东北财经大学;2016年
2 马宜路;英国新马克思主义历史学派的哲学探索[D];山西大学;2007年
，本文编号：2320148
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2320148.html
