弗里德曼的实证经济学方法论研究
发布时间：2018-11-16 10:38
【摘要】：弗里德曼是新一代芝加哥学派的领军人物,货币主义的主要倡导者。在新自由主义成为经济学主流的今天,货币主义作为新自由主义的一支在中国有很深刻的影响,而弗里德曼为自由主义经济学做辩护的《实证经济学方法论》是继门格尔和施穆勒的方法论之争以后最具代表性和争议性的经济学方法论,并在一定程度上奠定了弗里德曼在西方经济学界的地位。本文从政治经济学方法论的角度切入,分析弗里德曼的方法论主张及其货币主义对其方法论的运用,可以从一个新的视角理解新自由主义,揭示以“实证”、“科学”自称的新自由主义的伪科学性。本文主要分为四部分,第一部分是对弗里德曼方法论理论基础和渊源的探讨,按照历史和逻辑相统一的原则分别介绍了弗里德曼《方法论》的哲学基础——科学哲学、经济学基础——斯密以来的经济自由主义、经济学方法论来源——现象描述层面的“经验归纳法”和“逻辑演绎法”。第二部分是本文的核心内容,是对弗里德曼《实证经济学方法论》的详细解读和定性分析,通过分析,本文提炼出了弗里德曼方法论的基本论点：理论的目的在于预测,理论的检验标准也在于预测能力,假设条件的真实与否不能成为理论的检验标准；在此基础上,分析了弗里德曼的《方法论》为主流经济学带来的转向。第三部分是本文的重要内容,重点分析弗里德曼的货币主义理论对其经济学方法论的应用程度,并得出结论：他的理论对其方法论的运用经历了从遵循到背离的过程,并且他的方法论最终被证明彻底走向了失败。第四部分是弗里德曼的方法论对中国政治经济学的启示和借鉴,但这种借鉴要在明确主体和主义的前提下进行,因此这一部分首先分析了弗里德曼的主体和主义,随后指明了中国政治经济学的主体和主义,在此基础上,提出了扬弃其个人主义、借鉴其经济计量方法的主张。本文在运用系统抽象法对弗里德曼的方法论进行研究过程中,对于西方主流经济学中的“实证”和“抽象”进行了新的概念规定,将“实证”规定为现象描述,将“抽象”规定为“抽取”,这是本文主要的创新点。另外,本文对弗里德曼本人及其方法论在西方经济学历史和经济学方法论史上的地位给出了一个新的界定。
[Abstract]:Friedman was the leader of the new Chicago School and the leading monetarist. Today, when neoliberalism has become the mainstream of economics, monetarism, as a branch of neoliberalism, has a profound impact in China. Friedman's "empirical Economics Methodology", which defended liberal economics, is the most representative and controversial economic methodology after the controversy between Mengar and Schmueller. To a certain extent, Friedman's position in western economic circles was established. From the angle of political economics methodology, this paper analyzes Friedman's methodology and its application of monetarism, which can be understood from a new angle of view. Science calls itself the pseudo-scientific nature of neoliberalism. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the theoretical basis and origin of Friedman's methodology. According to the principle of the unity of history and logic, it introduces the philosophy foundation of Friedman's Methodology-philosophy of Science. The foundation of economics is the economic liberalism since Smith, the source of economics methodology, the empirical induction and the logical deduction at the level of phenomenon description. The second part is the core content of this paper, which is the detailed interpretation and qualitative analysis of Friedman's Methodology of empirical Economics. Through the analysis, this paper abstracts the basic arguments of Friedman's methodology: the purpose of the theory is to predict, The test criterion of theory also lies in the ability of prediction, and whether the hypothesis condition is true or not cannot become the test standard of theory. On this basis, the paper analyzes the turn of Friedman's methodology for mainstream economics. The third part is the important content of this paper, focusing on the application of Friedman's monetarist theory to its economic methodology, and draws a conclusion that his theory's application of his methodology has gone through a process from following to deviating. And his methodology turned out to be a complete failure. The fourth part is the enlightenment and reference of Friedman's methodology to China's political economy, but this kind of reference should be carried out on the premise of clear subject and doctrine, so this part first analyzes Friedman's subject and doctrine. Then it points out the subject and doctrine of Chinese political economy, and then puts forward the idea of sublation its individualism and using its econometric method for reference. In the course of studying Friedman's methodology with the method of system abstraction, this paper makes a new definition of "positivism" and "abstraction" in mainstream western economics, and defines "positivism" as a description of phenomenon. The main innovation of this paper is to define "abstraction" as "extraction". In addition, this paper gives a new definition of Friedman himself and his methodology in the history of western economics and economics methodology.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F091.3
本文编号：2335280
[Abstract]:Friedman was the leader of the new Chicago School and the leading monetarist. Today, when neoliberalism has become the mainstream of economics, monetarism, as a branch of neoliberalism, has a profound impact in China. Friedman's "empirical Economics Methodology", which defended liberal economics, is the most representative and controversial economic methodology after the controversy between Mengar and Schmueller. To a certain extent, Friedman's position in western economic circles was established. From the angle of political economics methodology, this paper analyzes Friedman's methodology and its application of monetarism, which can be understood from a new angle of view. Science calls itself the pseudo-scientific nature of neoliberalism. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the theoretical basis and origin of Friedman's methodology. According to the principle of the unity of history and logic, it introduces the philosophy foundation of Friedman's Methodology-philosophy of Science. The foundation of economics is the economic liberalism since Smith, the source of economics methodology, the empirical induction and the logical deduction at the level of phenomenon description. The second part is the core content of this paper, which is the detailed interpretation and qualitative analysis of Friedman's Methodology of empirical Economics. Through the analysis, this paper abstracts the basic arguments of Friedman's methodology: the purpose of the theory is to predict, The test criterion of theory also lies in the ability of prediction, and whether the hypothesis condition is true or not cannot become the test standard of theory. On this basis, the paper analyzes the turn of Friedman's methodology for mainstream economics. The third part is the important content of this paper, focusing on the application of Friedman's monetarist theory to its economic methodology, and draws a conclusion that his theory's application of his methodology has gone through a process from following to deviating. And his methodology turned out to be a complete failure. The fourth part is the enlightenment and reference of Friedman's methodology to China's political economy, but this kind of reference should be carried out on the premise of clear subject and doctrine, so this part first analyzes Friedman's subject and doctrine. Then it points out the subject and doctrine of Chinese political economy, and then puts forward the idea of sublation its individualism and using its econometric method for reference. In the course of studying Friedman's methodology with the method of system abstraction, this paper makes a new definition of "positivism" and "abstraction" in mainstream western economics, and defines "positivism" as a description of phenomenon. The main innovation of this paper is to define "abstraction" as "extraction". In addition, this paper gives a new definition of Friedman himself and his methodology in the history of western economics and economics methodology.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F091.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 瓦迪·哈拉比;余蕊;;米尔顿·弗里德曼新自由主义经济学的本质[J];国外理论动态;2007年03期
2 魏知;;米尔顿·弗里德曼：他赢了，他走了[J];名人传记(财富人物);2007年01期
3 李和平;弗里德曼的科学哲学思想[J];自然辩证法研究;2002年06期
，本文编号：2335280
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2335280.html
