中国经济学建构的文化根基:兼论经济史学研究新思路
发布时间：2019-01-17 10:21
【摘要】：经济学的逻辑起点是中国孟子的古典社会经济学,而不是英国亚当·斯密的古典政治经济学。古典社会经济学出发点是农工商的实践经验,开创"为富"与"为仁"二元分离先河,由于其早已强调思维,故能称其为切合中国的"经济学范式"。斯密重构了重商主义思想,并深化了以"经济人"为出发点的适应西方的"经济学范式"。后者能够演化为"经济学范式",只不过是"西方文化中心论"的产物。东西方文化分野,给"西方文化中心论"的形成提供了机会。时下,中华文化就有可能以相对独立且完整的知识体系重新走进世界历史舞台,并有开创适应中国国情的新经济学研究范式的丰富实践。
[Abstract]:The logical starting point of economics is the classical social economics of Mencius in China, not the classical political economy of Adam Smith in England. The starting point of classical social economics is the practical experience of agriculture, commerce and industry, which pioneered the dualistic separation of "rich" and "benevolent". Because it has already emphasized thinking, it can be called the "economic paradigm" suitable for China. Smith reconstructs the mercantilist thought and deepens the "economic paradigm" adapted to the West with "economic man" as the starting point. The latter can evolve into "economic paradigm", which is only the product of "western culture-centered theory". The cultural division between the East and the West provides an opportunity for the formation of the Western Cultural Center. Nowadays, it is possible for Chinese culture to re-enter the world historical stage with a relatively independent and complete knowledge system, and to create a rich practice of new economic research paradigm adapted to China's national conditions.
【分类号】：F092
本文编号：2409958
[Abstract]:The logical starting point of economics is the classical social economics of Mencius in China, not the classical political economy of Adam Smith in England. The starting point of classical social economics is the practical experience of agriculture, commerce and industry, which pioneered the dualistic separation of "rich" and "benevolent". Because it has already emphasized thinking, it can be called the "economic paradigm" suitable for China. Smith reconstructs the mercantilist thought and deepens the "economic paradigm" adapted to the West with "economic man" as the starting point. The latter can evolve into "economic paradigm", which is only the product of "western culture-centered theory". The cultural division between the East and the West provides an opportunity for the formation of the Western Cultural Center. Nowadays, it is possible for Chinese culture to re-enter the world historical stage with a relatively independent and complete knowledge system, and to create a rich practice of new economic research paradigm adapted to China's national conditions.
【分类号】：F092
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 陈进华;;财富共享研究述评[J];江海学刊;2007年06期
2 杨丽杰;王劲松;宗刚;;重构经济学研究的逻辑起点[J];商业时代;2014年15期
3 吴君;吴业明;;互联网金融创新的逻辑起点与法律边界——基于余额宝的商业模式[J];金融与经济;2014年06期
4 谢广山;;高职“项目——任务”课程模式的生成机制[J];改革与战略;2007年03期
5 杜丹阳;郑方;;略论文化管理在企业管理中的地位[J];商场现代化;2008年26期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 邱赤宏;马克思的需要理论及其现实意义[D];中共吉林省委党校;2012年
，本文编号：2409958
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2409958.html
