重商、自由重农与福利重农的思想内涵与比较研究——“经济—社会史”的综合分析框架

发布时间：2019-07-12 07:43

【摘要】：重商主义、自由重农主义与福利重农主义背后的管制、放任与干预逻辑早已在古代希腊罗马文明中出现,只是囿于当时的"共同体本位"结构,因此市场与宪政难以并存、国家市场体系与福利性政府干预互为b^格,最终造成帝国晚期的财政危机与社会崩溃。中世纪晚期的重商主义与近代魁奈式自由重农主义的分歧其实并不在于重视商业还是重视农业之别,而在于重视"管制民权、放任国(官)权"还是重视"保障民权、限制国(官)权"之别。当代的福利重农政策是宪政主义逻辑下大政府责任的体现,因此与前宪政时代重商体系下的大政府弄权截然有别。当代中国应反思管制主义的历史教训,吸取自由重农主义与福利重农主义的双重政治经验。
[Abstract]:The logic of laissez-faire and intervention has long appeared in the ancient Greek and Roman civilization, only due to the "community standard" structure at that time, so it is difficult for the market and constitutionalism to coexist, and the national market system and welfare government intervention are each other, resulting in the financial crisis and social collapse in the late imperial period. In fact, the difference between mercantilism in the late Middle Ages and Quinai free farming in modern times is not to attach importance to commerce or agriculture, but to attach importance to the difference between "regulating civil rights, allowing the state (official) power" or "protecting civil rights and restricting the rights of the state (official)". The contemporary policy of emphasizing agriculture on welfare is the embodiment of the responsibility of the big government under the logic of constitutionalism, so it is completely different from the power of the big government under the commercial system in the pre-constitutional era. Contemporary China should reflect on the historical lessons of regulation and draw on the dual political experience of free agriculture and welfare agriculture.
【作者单位】：安徽财经大学财政与公共管理学院;
【基金】：2009年度国家社会科学基金项目(09CJY063);2010年度国家社会科学基金项目(10CSH047) 2010年度安徽省教育厅项目(2010SK227)
【分类号】：F091.3

【参考文献】