基于Shapley值法的农村宅基地置换成本收益及分配分析——以江苏省万顷良田建设工程X项目区为例

发布时间：2018-01-05 01:31

本文关键词：基于Shapley值法的农村宅基地置换成本收益及分配分析——以江苏省万顷良田建设工程X项目区为例　出处：《农业经济问题》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文利用江苏省万顷良田建设工程中农村宅基地置换调查数据,以X项目区为例,分析了现行各参与主体的成本-收益及其分配格局,并运用Shapley值法进一步测算了利益主体间的成本-收益,形成了新的分配格局。研究结果表明,项目区农村宅基地置换收益大部分归政府所得,现行农户、村集体和政府的收益分配比例分别为24.1%、15.7%和60.2%;通过Shapley值法测算后农户、村集体和政府的收益分配比例为30.5.0%、36.5%和33.0%,基本达到了三方均衡;同时,农户收益增加了6.4%,村集体收益增加了20.8%,政府收益降低了27.2%,由此可见,Shapley值法有效地平衡了利益主体间的收益,提高了农户和村集体在农村宅基地置换中的收益分配,增加了农户和村集体财产性收入,使农户和村集体分享了城镇化带来的成果。
[Abstract]:Based on the survey data of rural homestead replacement in Wanqian good farmland construction project in Jiangsu Province, this paper analyzes the cost-benefit and distribution pattern of the current participants in the X project area as an example. And the use of Shapley value method to further calculate the cost-benefit between the main interests, forming a new distribution pattern. The results show that most of the income from the replacement of rural homestead in the project area belongs to the government income. The proportion of income distribution of rural households, village collectives and governments is 24.1g% and 60.2% respectively. The proportion of income distribution between the village collective and the government is 30.5.0% and 33.0% respectively after the calculation by Shapley value method, which basically reaches the three-way equilibrium. At the same time, the farmers' income increased by 6.4cm, the village collective income increased by 20.8m, the government income decreased by 27.2cm, so it can be seen. Shapley value method effectively balance the benefits between the main interests, improve the distribution of income between farmers and village collectives in the replacement of rural homestead, and increase the income of farmers and village collective property. So that farmers and villages collectively share the fruits of urbanization.
【作者单位】：中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金青年项目(编号:71303242)
【分类号】：F321.1
【正文快照】： 一、引言随着我国新型城镇化的不断推进,农村青壮年亿亩的宅基地空置,占宅基地总面积的42.2%。劳动力逐渐向城市转移,造成了农村“人走房空”刘彦随等(2013)对山东省76个村庄宅基地调查数的现象,产生了大量的空心村,农村宅基地利用率据显示,宅基地的空置率平均为17.1%。张良悦

【相似文献】