中国城镇化进程中土地征收模式转型研究——从保障农民生活到保护农民权益

发布时间：2018-01-16 08:04

本文关键词：中国城镇化进程中土地征收模式转型研究——从保障农民生活到保护农民权益　出处：《西部论坛》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：以"保障被征地农民现有生活水平"为政策基调的"保障式"土地征收模式,在快速推进中国城镇化发展取得显著成效的同时,也由于利益分配矛盾凸显而带来相应的社会风险和社会矛盾,进而引发了一些群体性冲突。"保障式"土地征收模式,在制度设计上存在《土地管理法》与《宪法》及《物权法》之间的衔接矛盾以及土地征收政策效果与城镇化目标之间的政策悖论,在运行机制上则体现为政府(开发商)与农民之间只有"自上而下"的单向对话机制以及对土地征收"行政强制"的约束和监管不足。随着新型城镇化的推进和生产力水平的提高,国家有经济能力对土地征收实施更高水平的社会赔偿,土地征收模式应在马克思主义社会公正理论指导下向以"保护被征地农民长远发展权益"为目标的"保护式"土地征收模式转型升级。"保护式"土地征收模式的建构,关键在于利益分配的公正和对话机制的公平,需要修订征地补偿政策,构建多元化的土地征收社会赔偿政策体系,并建立和完善"公示—反馈—公告"的民主决策机制以及"农民—政府—开发商"合作的平等协商机制。
[Abstract]:The "secure" mode of land expropriation, which is based on the policy of "ensuring the living standard of the peasants who have been expropriated", has achieved remarkable results while rapidly promoting the development of urbanization in China. It also brings the corresponding social risks and social contradictions because of the prominent contradiction of interest distribution, which leads to some group conflicts. "secure" land expropriation mode. In the system design, there is the contradiction between the Land Management Law and the Constitution and the Real right Law, and the policy paradox between the effect of the land expropriation policy and the goal of urbanization. In the operational mechanism, the government (developer). There is only a one-way dialogue mechanism of "top-down" between farmers and the restriction and supervision of land expropriation "administrative compulsion". With the development of new urbanization and the improvement of productivity level. The state has the economic capacity to implement a higher level of social compensation for land expropriation. The mode of land expropriation should be transformed and upgraded under the guidance of Marxist theory of social justice to "protect the long-term development rights and interests of peasants who have been expropriated". The construction of land expropriation model. The key lies in the justice of interest distribution and the fairness of dialogue mechanism. It is necessary to revise the policy of compensation for land expropriation and build a diversified policy system of social compensation for land expropriation. And establish and perfect the democratic decision-making mechanism of "public announcement-feedback-announcement" and the equal consultation mechanism of "farmer-government-developer" cooperation.
【作者单位】：中共江苏省无锡市委党校;南京大学政府管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目(16ASH006)
【分类号】：D922.3;F321.1
【正文快照】： 一、引言美国政治学家塞缪尔·亨廷顿(Samuel P.Huntington)认为,“现代化是近代以来世界历史发展的潮流和趋势,是一个世界性的历史进程”,“现代性孕育着稳定,而现代化过程却滋生着动乱。”(亨廷顿,2008)“亨廷顿悖论”也适用于“城镇化”和“城镇性”之间的关系,“城镇性”

【相似文献】