比较视角下退耕还林补偿的农村经济福利效应——基于陕西省79个退耕还林县的实证研究

发布时间：2018-01-17 15:15

本文关键词：比较视角下退耕还林补偿的农村经济福利效应——基于陕西省79个退耕还林县的实证研究　出处：《经济地理》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：已有研究表明,退耕区农民收入水平稳步增长,但农民对补偿水平、收入和生活质量等方面的满意度普遍偏低。这严重挫伤了农民对退耕还林政策的热情,导致复耕、后续产业参与度不高和工程进展缓慢等问题,不利于建立生态补偿长效机制。为此,在比较视角下构建退耕农村地区的经济福利函数,用影响农户经济福利的比较因素造成的效用变化率度量福利损失,分析这种收入与满意度背离的内在机制,并以陕西省为例,采用二步聚类法和倾向得分匹配法等方法,实证测算退耕农村地区的福利损失。文中考虑的比较因素包括退耕区农村当前收入水平与过去的比较(习惯性比较)、退耕区农村与城市收入水平的比较(城乡比较)和退耕区农村与非退耕区农村收入水平的比较(乡乡比较)。结果表明,和非退耕区相比,退耕区农村收入水平普遍更低,城乡收入差距更大;习惯性比较促进福利改进,城乡比较和乡乡比较阻碍福利改进,并据此提出相应政策建议。
[Abstract]:Previous studies have shown that the income level of farmers in the area has steadily increased, but the satisfaction of farmers on compensation level, income and quality of life is generally low, which seriously dampen the enthusiasm of farmers on the policy of returning farmland to forests. As a result of the problems of returning farmland, low participation of subsequent industries and slow progress of the project, it is not conducive to the establishment of a long-term mechanism of ecological compensation. Therefore, the economic welfare function of returning farmland in rural areas is constructed from the perspective of comparison. This paper uses the utility change rate of the comparative factors to measure the welfare loss, analyzes the internal mechanism of the deviation between income and satisfaction, and takes Shaanxi Province as an example. Two step clustering method and tendency score matching method are used. The comparative factors considered in this paper include the comparison between the current income level of the rural areas and the past (customary comparison). The comparison of income level between rural and urban areas (urban-rural comparison) and between rural areas and non-returning areas (township comparison). The results show that compared with non-returning areas. The income level in rural areas is generally lower and the income gap between urban and rural areas is larger; Customary comparison promotes welfare improvement, and urban-rural comparison and township comparison hinder welfare improvement, and corresponding policy suggestions are put forward.
【作者单位】：西安交通大学经济与金融学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大攻关项目(12&ZD072)
【分类号】：F326.2
【正文快照】： 退耕还林作为世界范围内政策性最强、投资最大、群众参与程度最高的生态补偿项目,它的重要意义不仅在于促进生态文明建设,还在于扶贫增收和提高农户的经济福利。农户的经济福利得到改善既是生态治理的前提条件,也是生态治理的重要目标(1)。2002年国务院下发了《关于进一步完善

【相似文献】