城市规划区农用地征收补偿标准研究

发布时间：2018-01-17 16:13

本文关键词：城市规划区农用地征收补偿标准研究　出处：《云南大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：土地问题是当前中国经济发展和城市化进程中最重要的问题之一。城市化进程加快带来的建设用地需求增加和我国土地用途管理制度,催生了土地问题中最为关键的征地问题,即国家征收集体土地,并将其用途变为建设用地。由于近年来建设用地紧缺和其价格的飞速上涨,征地矛盾开始频频出现,其中最主要的矛盾集中在征地补偿标准上。当前中国征地补偿标准均采用“统一年产值倍数法”和“区片综合地价法”两种方式来确定。这两类补偿标准均是建立在“土地年产值”这一基础上的,并用此来计算对被征地农民的补偿。基于“土地年产值”基础的补偿标准仅仅考虑到了土地的当前经济价值,对土地的预期经济价值、社会保障价值、生态价值和增值均不能体现,导致了当前征地补偿标准补偿范围过窄和补偿标准过低等问题,使得被征地农民获得的补偿普遍偏低,无法保障其根本利益和长远发展,从而引起农户与政府的冲突。特别是对城市规划区中农用地的征收,由于农地已经增值,现行的补偿标准无法维护农民的利益,此区域会比纯农业区矛盾更加尖锐。党的十八届三中全会明确提出了“保障农民公平分享土地增值收益”的观点,在这一背景下,本文以土地增值收益为切入点,引入“土地发展权”的理论,并将土地发展权价值具体细分为“农地发展权价值”和“市地发展权价值”,论证了“农地发展权价值归农民,市地发展权价值归国家”的这一观点。因此,本文在这一理论基础上构建了基于土地发展权的农用地征收补偿标准,将农用地价值细分为农用地经济价值、社会价值、生态价值、土地发展权价值四个部分,通过理论分析得出了在征地过程中,农地不同类别价值的分配。在这一新的补偿标准框架下,本文选取四川省南充市顺庆区的A地块征地案例对新旧补偿标准进行了实例对比分析。分析发现,在新旧补偿标准下,农地经济价值补偿标准差异较小,但新的标准在计算农地经济价值时更加适应经济形势的变化；旧标准未考虑农民的土地发展权价值,农民获得的补偿仅占到土地总收益的6%,新的标准考虑了农地发展权价值,农民获得的补偿占土地总收益的25%；从结果看来,新的补偿标准下农民能够得到的补偿是旧标准的3.6倍。新标准有利于提高在农地征收行为中农民的获得的补偿,有利于保障农民的生活的长远发展,维护好农民的切身利益,同时符合征地收益在国家、集体和个人中合理分配这一指导思想。
[Abstract]:Land problem is one of the most important problems in the process of economic development and urbanization in China. The most critical land expropriation problem is the expropriation of collective land by the state and the conversion of its use into construction land. Due to the shortage of construction land and the rapid increase of its price in recent years. The contradiction of land expropriation began to appear frequently, and the most important contradiction was focused on the standard of compensation for land requisition. At present, the compensation standards of land requisition in China are determined by "unified annual output value multiple method" and "district comprehensive land price method". Both of these two compensation standards are based on the "land annual output value". The compensation standard based on "annual output value of land" only takes into account the current economic value of land, the expected economic value of land and the value of social security. Ecological value and value-added can not be reflected, leading to the current land requisition compensation standard compensation range is too narrow and compensation standards are too low, so that the farmers who have been expropriated the compensation is generally low. It can not guarantee its fundamental interests and long-term development, thus causing conflicts between farmers and the government, especially the expropriation of agricultural land in urban planning areas, because the agricultural land has already increased in value. The current compensation standard can not protect the interests of farmers, this area will be more acute than pure agricultural areas. The third Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee clearly put forward the viewpoint of "ensuring the peasants to share the land value-added income equitably". Under this background, this paper introduces the theory of "land development right" with the land value-added income as the starting point. The value of land development right is subdivided into "value of farmland development right" and "value of city land development right", which proves that the value of farmland development right belongs to farmers and the value of city land development right belongs to state. On the basis of this theory, this paper constructs the compensation standard of agricultural land expropriation based on land development right, and subdivides the value of agricultural land into four parts: economic value, social value, ecological value and value of land development right. Through theoretical analysis, the distribution of different types of farmland value in the process of land expropriation is obtained. Under the framework of this new compensation standard, this paper selects a land expropriation case of Shunqing District, Nanchong City, Sichuan Province, and makes a comparative analysis of the old and new compensation standards. The analysis shows that under the new and old compensation standards. The difference of the compensation standard of farmland economic value is small, but the new standard is more suitable for the change of economic situation in the calculation of farmland economic value. The old standard does not take into account the value of farmers' land development rights, the compensation received by farmers only accounts for 6% of the total income of land, the new standard considers the value of agricultural land development rights, and the compensation received by farmers accounts for 25% of the total income of land; According to the results, the farmers can get 3.6 times more compensation under the new compensation standard than the old standard. The new standard is helpful to improve the compensation of farmers in the behavior of farmland expropriation. It is beneficial to ensure the long-term development of farmers' life, safeguard the vital interests of farmers, and accord with the guiding ideology of rational distribution of land expropriation proceeds among the state, collectives and individuals.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F321.1

【参考文献】