农民合作社梯次民主现象研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 08:26

  本文选题：农民合作社　切入点：梯次民主　出处：《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】："民主控制"是国际合作社联盟列出的合作社七原则之一。随着我国合作社不断发展,核心成员控制合作社话语权的治理模式突破了这一原则。依据调研,成员享有的民主权利事项分为入社自愿和退社自由、选举理事长、制定章程以及对生产经营中重大事项的决策四个层面,通过探寻不同层面上普通成员享有的和让渡的民主权利范围,发现在合作社内部,成员享有的和让渡的民主权利范围呈现差异性,概念化为"梯次民主",梯次攀升,民主程度增加,成员享有的民主权利从"进出权"到"选举权",再到"决策权",权利范围逐步扩大,让渡的民主权利范围随之缩小。目前,我国多数合作社仍处于低层次"民主梯次",造成此种现象的原因主要是民主成本过高影响效率,资本主导合作社发展给予了出资人充分话语权,成员不"自为"与风险不共担。
[Abstract]:"Democratic control" is one of the seven principles of cooperatives listed by the International Cooperative Alliance. With the continuous development of cooperatives in China, the governance model of controlling the voice of cooperatives by core members has broken through this principle. The democratic rights enjoyed by members can be divided into four levels: voluntary membership and freedom to withdraw from the association, election of a chairman, formulation of articles of association, and decision-making on major issues in production and operation. By exploring the scope of democratic rights enjoyed and transferred by ordinary members at different levels, it is found that the scope of democratic rights enjoyed and transferred by members is different within cooperatives, and conceptualized as "ladder democracy", which ascends step by step. With the increase in the degree of democracy, members enjoy democratic rights ranging from "right of access" to "right to vote", and then to "right to make decisions." the scope of power gradually expands, and the scope of democratic rights transferred becomes smaller. At present, Most of the cooperatives in our country are still in the low level "democratic echelon", the main reason for this phenomenon is that the democratic cost is too high to affect the efficiency, the development of capital-led cooperatives gives the investors full right to speak, and the members do not "act on their own" and do not share the risks.
【作者单位】： 中国农业大学人文与发展学院;
【分类号】：D082;F321.42
，

本文编号：1685109