集体经营性建设用地入市对土地征收制度的影响及联动改革

发布时间：2018-04-17 03:30

本文选题：集体经营性建设用地 + 入市　；参考：《浙江大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：集体经营性建设用地入市改革在十八届三中全会上已被正式提上议事日程,集体经营性建设用地进入市场流转已成定居。然而这一改革必然会对现行的土地制度框架产生重大影响,其中最突出的就是土地征收制度。为了理清集体经营性建设用地入市和土地征收这两项制度间的内在联系,模拟集体经营性建设用地入市对土地征收制度产生的影响并探索其影响机制,促进集体经营性建设用地入市与土地征收制度的联动改革。本文主要运用实然与应然分析法、案例分析法、对比分析法研究集体经营性建设用地入市可能对现行土地征收制度产生的影响,并提出二者联动改革的建议。本研究取得的主要成果包括以下四个方面：一是界定了经营性建设用地、非经营性建设用地与公共利益用地、非公共利益用地的内涵,分析了四者之间的内在联系,经营性建设用地范围与公共利益用地范围上存在一定交叉,二者是此消彼长的关系。由此得出集体经营性建设用地入市与土地征收两项制度具有一体两面性,此进彼退,相互关联不可分割。二是集体经营性建设用地全面入市即意味着集体建设用地中经营性非公共利益用地将依法进入公开的土地市场流转,土地征收权将被倒逼限定在非经营性公共利益用地范围。而对于经营性公共利益用地则可采用“国家购买”的机制运行。三是现行土地制度下,我国的土地征收权质态含混不清,名义上虽为“征收”,但实际操作中并没有征收权的强制性,多数政府在征收中引入谈判协商机制,使我国的土地征收更像是一种民事行为。而集体经营性建设用地全面入市即意味着土地征收权功能的疏解。现行的土地征收权功能将可能被一分为三,分为国家征收、市场运行和“国家购买”三种形式。同时,土地征收权的公权属性也会得到强化,土地征收权的职态逐步变的清晰即国家公权力。四是现行的土地征收补偿标准偏低已成为社会共识,集体经营性建设用地全面入市将会显化集体土地的市场价值,集体建设用地的市场价值可能会发展成为公益性征地补偿的客观标准。在文章最后提出了五条联动改革的建议：一是在法律的高度界定公共利益用地与非公共利益用地、经营性建设用地与非经营性建设用地这两组概念；二是在法律上明确公共利益用地和经营性建设用地的认定机关；三是建议在经营性公共利益用地类型中创建“国家购买”机制；四是在法律上强化公益性土地征收权的公权性质；五是逐步建立公正合理的征地补偿标准。
[Abstract]:The reform of collective management construction land has been put on the agenda of the third Plenary session of the 18th Central Committee, and the collective management construction land has been settled into the market.However, this reform will inevitably have a great impact on the current land system framework, the most prominent of which is the land expropriation system.In order to clarify the internal relation between the two systems of collective management construction land entry and land expropriation, the paper simulates the influence of collective management construction land entry on land expropriation system and explores its influence mechanism.To promote the collective management of construction land market and land expropriation system of the linkage reform.This article mainly uses the real and ought analysis method, the case analysis method, the contrast analysis method to study the collective management construction land entering the market may have the influence to the present land expropriation system, and puts forward the suggestion of the two linkage reform.The main achievements of this study include the following four aspects: first, it defines the connotation of operating construction land, non-operational construction land and public interest land, non-public interest land, and analyzes the internal relations between the four.There is a certain intersection between the scope of operational construction land and the scope of public interest land, and the two are the relationship between one and the other.It is concluded that the two systems of collective management construction land market entry and land expropriation have two sides, which are inseparable from each other.Second, the comprehensive market entry of collective operating construction land means that the land for non-public interest of collective construction land will enter the open land market circulation according to law, and the land expropriation right will be restricted to the scope of non-operating public interest land.But for the operating public interest land use may adopt "the state buys" the mechanism to operate.Third, under the current land system, the quality of the land expropriation right in our country is ambiguous and ambiguous. Although it is nominally "expropriated," there is no compulsory right to expropriate in practice. Most governments introduce negotiation and consultation mechanisms in expropriation.Land expropriation in our country is more like a civil act.The collective management of construction land into the market means that the land expropriation function of the dredging.The present function of land expropriation right may be divided into three forms: state expropriation, market operation and state purchase.At the same time, the public power attribute of land expropriation right will also be strengthened, and the status of land expropriation right will gradually change clearly, that is, the public power of the state.Fourth, it has become a social consensus that the current standard of compensation for land expropriation is on the low side. The market value of the collective land will be demonstrated by the comprehensive entry of the collective operating construction land into the market.The market value of collective construction land may develop into the objective standard of public welfare land requisition compensation.At the end of the article, the author puts forward five suggestions on the linkage reform: first, the concept of "public interest land" and "non-public interest land", "operating construction land" and "non-operational construction land" are highly defined in the law;The second is to make clear in the law the public interest land and the management construction land confirmation organ, the third is to propose to establish the "national purchase" mechanism in the management public interest land type;The fourth is to strengthen the public right nature of public welfare land expropriation, and the fifth is to establish fair and reasonable compensation standard for land expropriation.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F301.0

【参考文献】