农地“三权”分置的路径选择

发布时间：2018-06-18 06:23

本文选题：土地法学 + 农地“三权分置”　；参考：《中国土地科学》2017年02期

【摘要】：研究目的:在"三权分置"背景下探索农地的集体所有权、承包权和经营权的合理分置路径。研究方法:文献分析法、比较法。研究结果:(1)官方主流观点认为,"三权分置"就是坚持集体所有权不变,将原承包经营权拆分为承包权和经营权。(2)法学界质疑这种分离逻辑,认为承包经营权并不包含承包权和经营权,"三权分置"就是坚持集体所有权不变,在原土地承包经营权之上创设另一个经营权。(3)这两种"三权"分置路径均排除了集体所有权的参与,也未意识到"三权分置"改革对集体所有权缺陷的修补作用。研究结论:经比较发现,更合理的农地"三权"的分置路径应当是,在具有"总有"性质的集体所有权之上创设出具有成员权性质的农户承包权,籍此将集体所有权改造为可在实践中经由个人支配的产权形态;将原承包经营权更名为经营权,使之成为去身份化后的用益物权。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to explore the rational separation path of collective ownership, contract right and management right of agricultural land under the background of "three rights separate structure". Methods: literature analysis, comparative method. Research results: 1) the official mainstream view is that the "three rights divided" is to insist on the same collective ownership and split the original contractual management right into the contract right and the management right.) the legal circles question this separation logic. It is considered that the right to contract management does not include the right to contract and the right to operate, and that the "separation of three rights" means that the collective ownership right remains unchanged. The creation of another management right on the basis of the original land contractual management right. (3) these two "three rights" separate ways exclude the participation of collective ownership and fail to realize the role of the reform of "three rights separate structure" in repairing the defects of collective ownership. The conclusion of the study is that the more reasonable alternative path of farmland "three rights" should be to create the peasant household contract right with member right on the basis of collective ownership with "total ownership". In this way, the collective ownership can be transformed into the form of property rights which can be controlled by individuals in practice, and the original contractual management right is renamed as the management right, making it become the usufruct right after deidentity.
【作者单位】：江西师范大学财政金融学院;
【基金】：江西省社会科学规划一般项目“三权分离背景下农村土地承包权研究”(15JL01)
【分类号】：F321.1

【相似文献】