农户分化背景下浙江山区不同类型农户生计状况比较分析
发布时间：2018-08-18 08:35
【摘要】：基于可持续生计框架,利用浙江省临安、开化、永康、龙泉等4个县(市)的调查数据,从生计资本、生计策略、生计后果等3个方面比较分析了农业收入为主农户(Ⅰ类农户)和非农业收入为主农户(Ⅱ类农户)的生计状况。研究结果表明:在浙江山区,2类农户的生计资本各具优势,Ⅰ类农户物质资本和自然资本较为丰裕,最欠缺金融资本;Ⅱ类农户物质资本和人力资本较为丰裕,最欠缺自然资本。与Ⅰ类农户相比,Ⅱ类农户劳动时间更少,收入更高,来源更加多样化,贫困发生程度更低,对生活的满意程度更高,但对环境的不利影响也更大。在应对风险和压力选择上,2类农户做出的选择基本一致,应对风险主要采取借钱、动用储蓄等较为传统的方式,面临的主要生活压力是改善住房和医疗费用支出。总体来说,Ⅱ类农户的生计状况要好于Ⅰ类农户。
[Abstract]:Based on the sustainable livelihood framework, using the survey data of four counties (cities) in Lin'an, Kaihua, Yongkang and Longquan in Zhejiang Province, from livelihood capital to livelihood strategy, Three aspects of livelihood consequences were compared and analyzed, such as agricultural income mainly farmers (type I farmers) and non-agricultural income mainly farmers (type II farmers). The results show that the livelihood capital of the two types of farmers in Zhejiang mountainous area has their own advantages, the material capital and the natural capital of the first type farmers are abundant, and the financial capital is the most lacking, and the material capital and human capital of the second type farmers are relatively abundant. Lack of natural capital. Compared with the first type farmers, the second type farmers have less working time, higher income, more diversified sources, lower degree of poverty, higher degree of satisfaction with life, but also greater adverse impact on the environment. The choice of two types of farmers is basically the same in the choice of coping with risk and pressure. The main ways to deal with the risk are borrowing money and using savings. The main living pressure is to improve the expenditure of housing and medical expenses. In general, the livelihood of class 鈪，
本文编号：2188945
[Abstract]:Based on the sustainable livelihood framework, using the survey data of four counties (cities) in Lin'an, Kaihua, Yongkang and Longquan in Zhejiang Province, from livelihood capital to livelihood strategy, Three aspects of livelihood consequences were compared and analyzed, such as agricultural income mainly farmers (type I farmers) and non-agricultural income mainly farmers (type II farmers). The results show that the livelihood capital of the two types of farmers in Zhejiang mountainous area has their own advantages, the material capital and the natural capital of the first type farmers are abundant, and the financial capital is the most lacking, and the material capital and human capital of the second type farmers are relatively abundant. Lack of natural capital. Compared with the first type farmers, the second type farmers have less working time, higher income, more diversified sources, lower degree of poverty, higher degree of satisfaction with life, but also greater adverse impact on the environment. The choice of two types of farmers is basically the same in the choice of coping with risk and pressure. The main ways to deal with the risk are borrowing money and using savings. The main living pressure is to improve the expenditure of housing and medical expenses. In general, the livelihood of class 鈪，
本文编号：2188945
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2188945.html
