我国文化产业效率及其影响因素分析

发布时间：2018-04-29 17:44

本文选题：文化产业 + 典型相关分析　；参考：《浙江工业大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文运用典型相关分析和数据包络分析相结合的方法,试图剔除指标相关性对数据包络分析结果的影响,测度我国文化产业的效率水平,并探讨了影响文化产业效率的因素,为政府制定相关政策以促进文化产业发展提供了理论上的支持。本文选取了文化产业产值作为产出指标,文化产业从业人员、文化产业固定资产投资、政府财政扶持作为投入指标,运用CCA-DEA方法对我国14个省级行政区的2005年至2010年的效率水平进行了测度,并对沿海地区和内陆地区的文化产业效率情况进行比较,发现14个省级行政区的综合技术效率偏低并且是由纯技术效率低下和规模效率低下共同引起的。沿海地区文化产业综合技术效率水平要领先于内陆地区文化产业,两者之间的差距主要由规模效率的差异造成。随后,本文选取了我国14个省级行政区2006年至2010年的面板数据研究了文化产业效率的影响因素,结果发现省级行政区的经济发展水平、城市居民收入的提高有利于文化产业效率的提高,地方政府对文化产业的财政扶持则不利于文化产业效率的提高。本文进一步分析内陆地区和沿海地区文化产业效率影响因素的差异,发现两者之间的差异主要体现在三个方面：1.经济发展水平的影响作用不同,2.政府财政扶持的影响作用不同。
[Abstract]:This paper tries to eliminate the influence of index correlation on the results of data envelope analysis by means of typical correlation analysis and data envelope analysis , measures the efficiency level of cultural industry in China , and discusses the factors that affect the efficiency of cultural industry , and provides theoretical support for the government to formulate relevant policies to promote the development of cultural industry .

The paper selects the output value of cultural industry as output index , cultural industry practitioners , cultural industry fixed assets investment and government financial support as input indexes , and compares the efficiency level between 2005 and 2010 of 14 provincial administrative regions by using CCA - DEA method , and finds that the comprehensive technical efficiency of 14 provincial administrative regions is low and is caused by the low efficiency of pure technology and low scale efficiency .

Then , the paper selects the panel data of 14 provinces from 2006 to 2010 to study the influence factors of cultural industry efficiency . As a result , it is found that the economic development level of the provincial administrative region and the improvement of urban residents ' income are beneficial to the improvement of the efficiency of the cultural industry .

【学位授予单位】：浙江工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G124;F224

【参考文献】