基于GIS的云南省巧家县地质灾害风险评价
本文选题:地质灾害 + GIS ; 参考:《成都理工大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:2014年8月3日云南省昭通市鲁甸县发生6.5级地震,本文研究的巧家县与鲁甸县相邻,是此次地震中受灾较为严重的地区之一,受灾群众41.31万人,死亡78人,累计经济损失57.47亿元,同时造成了巧家县由震前三百多处灾害点增加到震后五百多处灾害点。对巧家县地质灾害风险评级符合巧家县地质灾害防治的需要,对于减少该县地质灾害造成的人员伤亡和财产损失具有十分重要的现实意义。本文以巧家县533处地质灾害作为研究对象,通过野外实地调查和资料收集获得了研究区地质灾害、地质环境和地理要素等基本情况,分析了地质灾害的分布特征和影响因素,运用GIS技术,采用信息量法、层次分析法、模糊综合评价法完成了巧家县地质灾害风险评价,根据风险评价结果提出地质灾害防治措施。论文的主要工作如下:(1)以巧家县地理、地质环境条件为背景,利用GIS软件空间分析功能,分析了研究区地质灾害分布特征及影响因素。(2)本文选取高程、坡度、断层、工程地质岩组、水系、降雨、地震7个指标建立地质灾害危险性评价体系。采用信息量法确定评价因子内部各分级的信息量值,层次分析法确定各评价因子权重,利用GIS软件栅格计算功能,将研究区划分为地质灾害危险性高、中、低三个区。(3)本文选取人口密度、耕地密度、道路密度、GDP密度4个指标建立地质灾害易损性评价体系。以乡镇为评价单元,采用模糊综合评价法,将研究区各乡镇地质灾害易损性划分为高、中、低三个区。(4)结合巧家县地质灾害危险性、易损性评价结果,采用风险性(R)=危险性(H)×易损性(V)理论模型,利用GIS软件栅格计算功能,将研究区划分为地质灾害风险性高、中、低三个区。(5)根据巧家县风险评价结果,针对重点、次重点、一般防治区提出具体的近期和中远期地质灾害防治措施。
[Abstract]:A magnitude 6.5 earthquake occurred in Ludian County, Zhaotong City, Yunnan Province on August 3, 2014. Qiaojia County, which is adjacent to Ludian County in this paper, is one of the more severely affected areas in this earthquake. 413100 people were affected and 78 people were killed. The cumulative economic loss of 5.747 billion yuan has also increased from more than 300 disaster points before the earthquake to more than 500 disaster points after the earthquake. The risk rating of geological hazard in Qiaojia county is in line with the need of geological disaster prevention and control in Qiaojia county. It is of great practical significance to reduce the casualties and property losses caused by geological disasters in Qiaojia county. This paper takes 533 geological hazards in Qiaojia County as the research object, obtains the basic conditions of geological hazards, geological environment and geographical elements in the study area through field investigation and data collection, and analyzes the distribution characteristics and influencing factors of geological disasters. The geological hazard risk assessment of Qiaojia county is completed by using GIS technology, information quantity method, analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. According to the result of risk evaluation, the measures of geological hazard prevention and control are put forward. The main work of this paper is as follows: (1) based on the geographical and geological environment conditions of Qiaojia County, and using the spatial analysis function of GIS software, the distribution characteristics and influencing factors of geological hazards in the study area are analyzed.) in this paper, height, slope, fault are selected. The risk assessment system of geological hazards is established according to seven indexes of engineering geological rock formation, water system, rainfall and earthquake. Using the information quantity method to determine the information value of each grade inside the evaluation factor, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to determine the weight of each evaluation factor, and the GIS software grid computing function is used to divide the study area into high geological hazard risk. In this paper, four indexes, population density, cultivated land density, road density and GDP density, are selected to establish a vulnerability evaluation system for geological hazards. Taking villages and towns as evaluation units and adopting fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the vulnerability of each township geological hazard in the study area is divided into three areas: high, middle and low) combined with the evaluation results of geological hazard risk and vulnerability in Qiaojia County. Based on the theoretical model of risk / vulnerability / V) and GIS software grid computing function, the study area is divided into three areas with high, middle and low geological hazard risk.) according to the risk evaluation results of Qiaojia County, the key points and the second key points are discussed. Specific short-and medium-long-term geological hazard prevention and control measures are put forward in the general prevention area.
【学位授予单位】:成都理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:P694
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈曦炜;裴志远;王飞;;基于GIS的贫困地区降雨诱发型地质灾害风险评估——以湖北省恩施州为例[J];地球信息科学学报;2016年03期
2 张云涛;周美珍;;基于GIS技术的地质灾害风险分析系统研究[J];山西建筑;2015年11期
3 倪晓娇;南颖;;基于GIS的长白山地区地质灾害风险综合评估[J];自然灾害学报;2014年01期
4 许冲;徐锡伟;戴福初;肖建章;谭锡斌;袁仁茂;;Landslide Hazard Mapping Using GIS and Weight of Evidence Model in Qingshui River Watershed of 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake Struck Region[J];Journal of Earth Science;2012年01期
5 常晓军;魏伦武;王德伟;;雅砻江流域地质灾害分布特征及其影响因素分析[J];灾害学;2009年03期
6 黄润秋;李为乐;;“5.12”汶川大地震触发地质灾害的发育分布规律研究[J];岩石力学与工程学报;2008年12期
7 宋强辉;刘东升;吴越;李东升;;地质灾害风险评估学科基本术语的理解与探讨[J];地下空间与工程学报;2008年06期
8 宋飞;赵法锁;;地下工程风险分析的层次分析法及MATLAB应用[J];地球科学与环境学报;2008年03期
9 薛强;祖彪;;地质灾害风险评价研究[J];山西建筑;2007年24期
10 谢韬;何政伟;黄民奇;许辉熙;汪宙峰;;RS与GIS技术在库区地质灾害调查中的应用研究[J];测绘科学;2007年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 菊春燕;青岛崂山风景区地质灾害风险与防控研究[D];中国海洋大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 李浩宾;基于GIS的大比例尺滑坡危险性评价方法研究[D];成都理工大学;2016年
2 宋晓华;基于GIS的地质灾害评估研究[D];北京建筑大学;2013年
3 王磊;基于GIS的理县滑坡地质灾害风险性评价[D];成都理工大学;2013年
4 魏从玲;基于GIS的巫山县滑坡地质灾害危险性评价[D];西南大学;2008年
,本文编号:2003184
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2003184.html