高填明洞土压力卸载模型试验和数值模拟研究
本文选题:高填明洞 + 土压力 ; 参考:《兰州交通大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:明洞作为采用明挖法修筑的隧道结构的一种,在由山、原、川三大地貌类型构成主体的黄土高原被广泛使用。交通的迅速发展促进了城市化进程的加快,也使得城市用地日趋紧张,削山造地、深沟回填成为了创造城市用地的一大主要途径。因而,针对于明洞回填的工程也逐渐增多,回填高度也逐渐增大,而由于多数明洞设计之初大都未考虑明洞上方高回填情况,不断增大的明洞回填土压力成为了影响明洞正常安全使用的重要不利因素之一。高填方明洞土压力问题属于高填结构物土压力问题范畴,而目前对于高填结构物土压力的研究则主要集中在涵洞(管)方面,对于高填明洞研究较少。回填过程中不断增大的土压力将对明洞结构安全产生极其不利的影响,导致明洞结构病害的产生。基于以上问题的出现,本文围绕明洞回填过程中采取何种措施达到减小明洞所受土压力及确定卸载后明洞顶土压力两方面问题开展了研究。首先,根据不同卸载设置条件下的的室内模型试验,得到回填过程中明洞土压力变化规律;然后,建立有限元分析模型,对影响卸载作用下明洞土压力影响因素进行了探究;最后,根据室内试验和有限元分析结果,依据岩土力学理论,对加筋卸载作用下的明洞顶土压力进行了理论计算公式推导。主要结论如下:(1)通过对不同卸载设置条件下的高填明洞土压力模型试验的土压力、土体沉降实测得到:无论设置卸载措施与否,明洞回填过程中,洞顶、洞脚土压力随填土高度都呈非线性变化;减小明洞内外土柱沉降差绝对值而有利于明洞顶土压力的减小,且设置方式不同,卸载效率不同;在设置低压实度孔的条件下,土工格栅的铺设有利于进一步减小明洞洞顶土压力,但由于格栅变形空间有限,多层减载效果不明显;增大明洞两侧填土压缩模量对提高低压实土和土工格栅组合卸载措施的卸载率有积极作用;填土高度不大时,明洞顶土压力可近似采用土柱法γH计算,填土高度增大,土柱法不再适用。(2)建立有限元分析模型,分析结果表明:明洞回填过程中,明洞顶产生土拱效应有利于明洞顶土压力的减小;各因素分析中,低压实度孔的设置对于减小明洞内外土柱沉降差绝对值影响最大,因而对明洞顶土压力大小影响也最为显著。(3)参照室内模型试验、有限元分析结果,建立边坡存在条件下的加筋卸载高填明洞顶土压力计算模型,以等沉面高度Hc为界,推导得到了不同填土高度下的明洞顶土压力计算公式,为高填土明洞及其减载结构设计及施工提供理论参考。
[Abstract]:As one of the tunnel structures constructed by the method of open excavation, the Ming Cave is widely used in the Loess Plateau, which is composed of three main geomorphological types: mountain, original and Sichuan. The rapid development of transportation accelerates the process of urbanization and makes urban land use more and more tense. Cutting mountains and making land, deep ditch backfill has become one of the main ways to create urban land. As a result, the number of backfill projects for the Ming Cave is increasing gradually, and the backfill height is also gradually increasing. However, most of the design of the Ming Cave does not consider the high backfill situation above the Ming Cave at the beginning of the design. The increasing backfill pressure has become one of the important unfavorable factors affecting the safe use of the tunnel. The earth pressure problem of high filling open tunnel belongs to the category of high fill structure soil pressure, but at present, the study of high fill structure earth pressure is mainly focused on culvert (pipe), but the research on high fill open tunnel is less. The increasing earth pressure in the backfill process will have an extremely adverse effect on the structural safety of the open tunnel, resulting in the occurrence of the structural diseases of the open tunnel. Based on the above problems, this paper focuses on two aspects: what measures should be taken to reduce the earth pressure of the open tunnel and how to determine the earth pressure of the roof of the open tunnel after unloading. Firstly, according to the indoor model tests under different unloading conditions, the variation law of soil pressure in the open tunnel during backfilling is obtained, and then, the finite element analysis model is established to explore the influencing factors of the soil pressure in the open tunnel under the action of unloading. Finally, according to the results of laboratory tests and finite element analysis, and based on the theory of geotechnical mechanics, the theoretical calculation formula for the earth pressure of the open roof under the action of reinforcement and unloading is derived. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) through the soil pressure of the model test of the high filling tunnel under different unloading conditions, the settlement of the soil is measured: no matter whether the unloading measures are set up or not, the roof of the tunnel in the course of backfilling is obtained. The soil pressure at the bottom of the tunnel varies nonlinear with the height of the fill, and reducing the absolute value of the settlement difference between the soil column inside and outside the tunnel is beneficial to the reduction of the soil pressure at the top of the tunnel, and the setting way is different, and the unloading efficiency is different. Under the condition of setting the hole with low compaction degree, The laying of geogrid is conducive to further reducing the earth pressure at the top of the tunnel, but the effect of multi-layer load reduction is not obvious because of the limited deformation space of the grid. Increasing the compression modulus of the filling on both sides of the open tunnel has a positive effect on increasing the unloading rate of the combined unloading measures of low-pressure solid soil and geogrid, and when the filling height is small, the earth pressure of the roof of the tunnel can be calculated approximately by using the soil column method 纬 H, and the height of the fill will increase. Soil column method is no longer applicable. (2) the finite element analysis model is established. The results show that the soil arch effect at the top of the open tunnel is beneficial to the reduction of the earth pressure of the open roof in the course of the backfilling of the open tunnel, and in the analysis of various factors, The setting of low compaction hole has the greatest influence on reducing the absolute value of settlement difference of soil column inside and outside the open tunnel, so it also has the most significant effect on the soil pressure of the roof of the open tunnel. (3) referring to the results of indoor model test and finite element analysis, In this paper, a calculation model of the earth pressure at the top of a reinforced and unloading high filling tunnel is established under the condition of slope existence. Taking the equal settlement height HC as the boundary, the formula for calculating the earth pressure of the open top of the tunnel with different filling heights is derived. It provides a theoretical reference for the design and construction of high-fill open tunnel and its load-reducing structure.
【学位授予单位】:兰州交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:TU432
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 王全才;王兰生;李宗有;王浩;徐小林;;都汶路恢复重建中的主要地震次生山地灾害与明洞工程[J];山地学报;2011年03期
2 卢勋;;赵家庄1#隧道沟谷地段明洞施工控制[J];科技资讯;2011年19期
3 张洪杰;;隧道明洞涌水段软土基坑处理施工技术[J];今日科苑;2010年02期
4 康雪军;;某隧道偏压半明洞及浅埋段施工[J];科技资讯;2007年07期
5 葛立新;;某城市公路隧道明洞边/仰坡支护工程施工技术[J];科技情报开发与经济;2009年11期
6 王桂元;铁路复线低庄明洞挖孔桩光爆技术[J];太原科技;2000年02期
7 李盛;王起才;马莉;李建新;李伟龙;;黄土地区高填土明洞土拱效应及土压力减载计算[J];岩石力学与工程学报;2014年05期
8 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 邹勇;傅旭东;邵中勇;徐复兴;;明洞在崩滑体治理工程中的设计与实践[A];第二届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集(上册)[C];2006年
2 张旭珍;;香林寺明洞设计与施工简介[A];甘肃省科协年会铁道分会场“兰武二线建设研讨会”论文集[C];2004年
3 胡桂先;;软弱地层超长明洞施工技术[A];中国土木工程学会第十五届年会暨隧道及地下工程分会第十七届年会论文集[C];2012年
4 吴剑;王建宇;万晓燕;史宪明;;隧道群之间的连接明洞对车内瞬变压力变化规律的影响研究[A];第十二届海峡两岸隧道与地下工程学术与技术研讨会论文集[C];2013年
5 孙怀凤;李术才;崔伟;邱道宏;刘钦;;综合地质预报在某隧道明洞探测中的应用[A];全国地下工程超前地质预报与灾害治理学术及技术研讨会论文集(Ⅰ)[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 记者 刘洋 通讯员 方建新;临策铁路破解穿越沙漠难题[N];内蒙古日报(汉);2008年
2 本报记者 朱烨;韩国首尔明洞商业街高人气的购物天堂[N];中国服饰报;2011年
3 通讯员 张召 舒郁仁;中铁四局集团防风明洞预制场改进管片模具[N];人民铁道;2012年
4 李良苏 王宏社;铁路是这样建成的[N];中国铁道建筑报;2009年
5 汪碧云;绩黄高速冲刺年度目标任务[N];黄山日报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 徐nI源;高速铁路高填方明洞双层衬砌设计方法研究[D];西南交通大学;2015年
2 李建新;高填明洞土压力卸载模型试验和数值模拟研究[D];兰州交通大学;2015年
3 戴增强;兰新二线防风明洞结构安全性数值模拟研究[D];西南交通大学;2011年
4 朱勇士;兰新二线防风装配式明洞接头形式优化研究[D];西南交通大学;2012年
,本文编号:2038403
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2038403.html