黔东南下江群岩相组合、物源特征及其构造意义
[Abstract]:The South China plate is composed of Yangtze block and Huaxia block. The collage between them formed an arc-shaped Jiangnan orogenic belt on the southeast margin of Yangtze River. The formation and evolution of the orogenic belt has been paid close attention to by geoscientists for a long time. The Lower Yangtze Group is distributed in Hunan, Guizhou and Guangxi areas in the western section of the Jiangnan orogenic belt, with angle unconformity overlying the Fanjingshan Group and parallel unconformity under the South China series, which is a set of extremely thick continental clastic rocks with volcanic clastic rocks. There have been many controversies about the age of the strata, basin type and tectonic background, and detailed study of them can effectively explore the evolution process of the western section of the Jiangnan orogenic belt. Based on the detailed field geological survey, the sedimentary facies and provenance properties of the Lower Yangtze Group in the southeast of Guizhou and its adjacent areas are studied by means of sedimentology, geochemistry and isotopic chronology. The basin nature and tectonic setting of Xiajiang Group are systematically analyzed based on the regional research results. Based on the identification of facies markers and the study of lateral and vertical variation of lithology, it is found that the Xiajiang Group in the study area is a set of contemporaneous and heterogeneous sedimentary products, and the Fangjingshan and Zhijiang areas are shore-shallow-sea shelf environments. The Liping-Tianzhu area in the southeast of Guizhou is a continental slope environment, which reflects the paleogeographic pattern in the north, south and south of the basin. The results show that the rock types of the sandstone are lithic feldspathic sandstone and feldspathic sandstone, and the main clastic components are quartz, feldspar, felsic volcanic rock and a little sedimentary lithology. The characteristics of rare earth and trace elements show that the source rocks of the Lower Yangtze Group are derived from the Dickinson source of felsic magmatic rocks. The results show that the tectonic setting of the source area of the Lower Yangtze Group is mainly a magmatic arc, and the tectonic setting of the source area of the bottom layer is a re-cycle orogenic belt. These characteristics suggest that the provenance of the Lower Yangtze Group may come from the intermediate-acid volcanic rocks of magmatic arcs. The dating of tuff at the bottom of Qingshuijiang formation in Fanjingshan area is 777 卤9 Ma.The age spectrum of detrital zircon from the Lower Yangtze Group shows that the age range is mainly 810 ~ 760 Ma, with a main peak value of 794 Ma and a weak peak value of 2016 Ma at 810 ~ 760 Ma. The oscillating ring zone and the ratio of Th- / U > 0.4 have the characteristics of magmatic genesis. By comparing the zircon age spectra with those of the Yangtze and Huaxia blocks, it is found that the lower Yangtze group and the northern Yangtze block have similar age spectra, combined with the southward paleodirection and sandstone lithic characteristics. It is considered that the source region of the Lower Yangtze Group should be the intermediate-acid volcanic rocks of the Lower Flavand Jingshan Group and the northern margin of Yangtze River. The rock assemblages, distribution of sedimentary facies and provenance characteristics indicate that the sedimentary basins of the Lower Yangtze Group are wedge-top basins, and their evolution has undergone a slow subsidence period (Jialu formation-Wuye formation); The filling process of three stages: Hengluchong formation-Tongtawan formation, initial rifting stage (Fanzhao formation-Qingshuijiang formation; Wuqiangxi formation-DuoYitang formation) and strong rifting stage (Pingliao formation-Longli formation; Lilong formation-Niu-Ping formation). The subduction orogeny of Yangtze and Cathaysian massif probably lasted until the late early Paleozoic.
【学位授予单位】:中国地质大学(北京)
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:P542.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈建书;戴传固;彭成龙;卢定彪;王雪华;王敏;包立新;张德明;骆珊;;湘黔桂地区新元古代“下江群”地层划分对比研究——重新启用下江系的探讨[J];地质论评;2016年05期
2 彭松柏;刘松峰;林木森;吴长峰;韩庆森;;华夏早古生代俯冲作用(Ⅰ):来自糯垌蛇绿岩的新证据[J];地球科学;2016年05期
3 吴开彬;曾广乾;陈国雄;杨坤光;;布格重力异常揭示的贵州深部构造特征[J];地质科技情报;2016年01期
4 邓贵标;杨忠琴;田文明;古镇综;杨竹;;贵州三穗地区隆里组的沉积物源与沉积环境分析[J];中国地质调查;2015年07期
5 高林志;尹崇玉;丁孝忠;王泽九;张恒;;华南地区新元古代年代地层标定及地层对比[J];地球学报;2015年05期
6 覃永军;杜远生;牟军;卢定彪;龙建喜;王安华;张厚松;曾昌兴;;黔东南地区新元古代下江群的地层年代及其地质意义[J];地球科学(中国地质大学学报);2015年07期
7 覃小锋;王宗起;王涛;熊彬;冯佐海;杨文;朱安汉;宋炯;黄杰;;桂东鹰扬关群火山岩时代和构造环境的重新厘定:对钦杭结合带西南段构造格局的制约[J];地球学报;2015年03期
8 牟军;罗香建;王安华;张厚松;覃永军;刘天强;吴滔;;贵州锦屏地区新元古代下江群地球化学特征及构造环境研究[J];高校地质学报;2015年01期
9 谷志东;汪泽成;;四川盆地川中地块新元古代伸展构造的发现及其在天然气勘探中的意义[J];中国科学:地球科学;2014年10期
10 高林志;陈建书;戴传固;丁孝忠;王雪华;刘燕学;王敏;张恒;;黔东地区梵净山群与下江群凝灰岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄[J];地质通报;2014年07期
,本文编号:2119405
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2119405.html