云南省寻甸县沙湾大沟泥石流地质特征与危险性评价
[Abstract]:Shawan ditu debris flow is located in Jin Yuan Township, Xundian County, Yunnan Province, located in the vicinity of the Xiaojiang Fault Zone and the east side of the West Branch fault of the Xiaojiang Fault Zone. The debris flow is a kind of sediment, stone, water and gas mixed with each other and one of the geological disasters in the mountain area. It is complicated, accidental, regular and inevitable. The risk and harmfulness of debris flow is also known as the degree of danger and hazard. The degree of danger refers to the possibility of the damage of the damaged object by debris flow: the degree of damage is the degree of damage to the damaged object in the basin. The degree of the risk is the debris flow itself, and the degree of danger is in the position of the damaged object in the basin. The risk assessment of debris flow is an important way to study and prevent debris flow. The analytic hierarchy process is a multivariate statistical analysis method of quantitative theory. Combined with the actual situation of the debris flow, this study is divided into three levels, target layer, standard layer and index layer, and target layer is the evaluation of debris flow hazard degree. The standard layer includes disaster factors, terrain and geomorphology, source conditions and so on. The index layer includes the loose material reserves, the average ratio drop of the main ditch, the total basin area, the terrain slope, the maximum rainfall of 24 hours, the maximum relative height difference, the length ratio of the sediment supply section, the main channel length, the watershed cutting density, the main groove bed bending coefficient, vegetation coverage and so on. Factor. Through the investigation and calculation of the previous basic work, the factors in the index layer are assigned and scored, and all the factors are added and added. Finally, the risk assessment of the debris flow in the Shawan big gully is finally used. The geological structure of the Shai Wan ditu mudflow basin is complex, the lithology is complex, and the topography and geomorphology conditions are complex. The debris flow gully is located at the east side of the Songming Cangxi large fault of the active fault Xiaojiang Fault Zone, about 1.5km, which is affected and affected by the active fault. The rock mass structure in the study area is broken and the terrain fluctuates greatly. The Shawan big gully appears "gourd", the upstream terrain is gentle and broad, the channel is mostly "V". The lithology of form and outcropping strata is limestone, dolomitic limestone, muddy siltstone, shale and other carbonate and clastic rocks. The gully bank is not stable, and there are many bad geological conditions, such as landslides and collapses, which provide favorable source conditions for debris flow formation, the formation of debris flow, the deep cutting of the terrain, the narrow terrain and the narrow channel. The stratum lithology is dolomitic limestone, basalt and other hard rock groups, and the gully bank and trench bed are more stable. It is beneficial to the rapid circulation of debris flow and the circulation area of debris flow. The downstream terrain is flat and open, the outlet is fan shape, the accumulation layer is thicker, the groove bed is wide and the flow velocity of debris flow drops sharply, often the mud is stopped and mud is accumulated. Through investigation and analysis and parameter calculation, the main achievements and understanding of this paper are as follows: (1) the morphology of the debris flow in the Shawan ditu mudflow basin has the characteristics of the formation area, the circulation area and the accumulation area, which lays the foundation for the formation of debris flow and provides the space for the debris flow. (2) the outflow of the inland layer in the study area Not completely, lithology is dominated by muddy siltstone, shale and other clastic rocks, affected and destroyed by active faults, rock mass broken, weathering, joint fracture development, and formation of source conditions. (3) calculation results of important parameters of debris flow, bulk weight gamma c=2.12t/m3, flow velocity uc=5.05m/s, flow Qz=61.5m3/s, overall impact force F=94.42K.Pa, single block The formation mechanism of the debris flow in F=1600.00KPa. (4) Shawan big gully is just under the condition of physical source, water source and topographic conditions with the organic combination of three organic combination. It has large scale, high frequency, high velocity, great impact force, and carrying huge coarse grain. (5) using analytic hierarchy process to carry out mud The result of the rock flow hazard assessment Q=136. (6) the downstream of the Shawan ditu debris flow is distributed in towns, villages, road traffic, electric power communication and farmland water conservancy. The current situation is very harmful. The debris flow is buried (buried), impact (impact), erosion and abrasion, clogging and extrusion of river channels will cause damage to different extent, The damage mechanism of debris flow. (7) the development trend of debris flow in Shawan ditu debris flow, from three aspects of source condition, water source condition and terrain condition, will increase in both scale and frequency. (8) the debris flow of Shawan big gully is a valleys viscous high frequency extremely dangerous debris flow.
【学位授予单位】:昆明理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:P642.23
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;泥石流与滑坡[J];中国地理与资源文摘;2004年01期
2 王维早;杨小荟;贾磊;李源;;西南某泥石流沟泥石流发生率的研究[J];水土保持研究;2006年04期
3 吴义鹰;邓雄业;赵建壮;;磨子沟泥石流的特征研究[J];西部探矿工程;2008年07期
4 落文青;;来自大自然的威胁——泥石流[J];农家参谋;2010年10期
5 代德富;齐馨;;云南省小江流域泥石流与生态现状分析研究[J];科技创新与应用;2012年05期
6 田密;胡凯衡;;震后泥石流的阻力特性及冲出总量计算[J];水利学报;2012年S2期
7 李i7,陈琴德,康志成;云南东川蒋家沟泥石流发生、发展过程的初步分析[J];地理学报;1979年02期
8 张顺英;西藏古乡泥石流暴发的气象条件及予报的可能性[J];冰川冻土;1980年02期
9 ;第一届全国泥石流学术会议在成都召开[J];地理学报;1980年03期
10 潘仲仁;遥感技术在泥石流沟调查中的应用效果[J];国土资源遥感;1989年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 严璧玉;;成昆铁路北段峡谷区潜在型泥石流[A];全国第三次工程地质大会论文选集(下卷)[C];1988年
2 田孝诚;徐勤;;对我国北方山区铁路泥石流的初步认识与选线体会[A];全国第三次工程地质大会论文选集(下卷)[C];1988年
3 杨俊杰;;泥石流地区隧道位置选择[A];全国第三次工程地质大会论文选集(下卷)[C];1988年
4 王宇丰;;遥感技术在成昆铁路沙湾至泸沽泥石流普查与动态研究中的效果[A];第四届全国工程地质大会论文选集(三)[C];1992年
5 周陈生;杨晓莉;白金玉;郭会川;;近坝区泥石流(群)沟的危险性及其对电站的影响评价[A];中国地质学会工程地质专业委员会2007年学术年会暨“生态环境脆弱区工程地质”学术论坛论文集[C];2007年
6 崔鹏;庄建琦;陈兴长;张建强;周小军;;汶川地震区震后泥石流活动特征与防治对策[A];第八届海峡两岸山地灾害与环境保育学术研讨会论文集[C];2011年
7 李泳;陈晓清;胡凯衡;;泥石流活动与流域特征曲线[A];第八届海峡两岸山地灾害与环境保育学术研讨会论文集[C];2011年
8 杨重存;;国道212线泥石流、滑坡的分类与分级[A];中国公路学会’2001学术交流论文集[C];2001年
9 崔鹏;韦方强;谢洪;钟敦伦;杨坤;何易平;胡凯衡;;西部开发中的泥石流问题与其减灾[A];中国科协2002年减轻自然灾害研讨会论文汇编之十[C];2002年
10 刘希林;苏鹏程;李秀珍;;四川德昌县纸房沟泥石流灾害风险评估[A];中国灾害防御协会——风险分析专业委员会第一届年会论文集[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 舒萍;“减轻泥石流的灾害,重在防预!”[N];四川科技报;2007年
2 黄星高 西南交通大学土木学院 周金星;多措并举 预警为先 科学防治泥石流[N];中国水利报;2009年
3 彭丽 顾华宁;要为泥石流留下一定空间[N];中国国土资源报;2012年
4 水电顾问集团 范俊喜;水电工程如何避免泥石流影响?[N];中国能源报;2013年
5 靳怀成;北京科学防治泥石流[N];中国水利报;2003年
6 徐连欣;泥石流瞬间暴发的灾难[N];兰州日报;2006年
7 刘谨;我国约7400万人受泥石流威胁[N];中国国土资源报;2007年
8 安集;发生泥石流怎么办?[N];中华合作时报;2008年
9 安集;泥石流的时间周期规律和预报方法[N];中华合作时报;2008年
10 实习记者 李霞;一看二听识别泥石流 专家教你紧急避险[N];成都日报;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 郭国和;川藏公路南线泥石流堵塞坝溃决机理与洪水特征研究[D];重庆交通大学;2009年
2 张玉萍;泥石流冲击信号识别方法研究[D];重庆交通大学;2009年
3 李志军;磨子沟泥石流对卓斯甲水电站拟建厂区影响评价[D];西南交通大学;2009年
4 侯凯;陕西省宝鸡市贾村镇泥石流风险评价[D];中国地质大学(北京);2010年
5 王昱;山区沿河公路路基在泥石流作用下破坏机制与防护技术研究[D];重庆交通大学;2010年
6 王磊;泥石流排导工程设计与优化方法研究[D];中南大学;2010年
7 朱华藏;浙江省缙云县小流域泥石流分析与评价[D];浙江工业大学;2009年
8 陈骧;基于灾变链式理论的泥石流跟踪与防治[D];重庆交通大学;2009年
9 熊斌;安县干沟桥泥石流成因及发展趋势预测研究[D];成都理工大学;2010年
10 鲁科;泥石流暴发频率与其形成区岩性的相关性研究[D];成都理工大学;2010年
,本文编号:2161473
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2161473.html