山东省羊庄盆地岩溶水系统地下水可持续开发利用研究
[Abstract]:The karst water-bearing system in Yangzhuang Basin is a typical karst water-bearing system in the north of China with complete boundary conditions and regions of recharge, diameter and discharge. In recent years, due to the development of industry and agriculture, a large number of groundwater has been exploited, resulting in a substantial reduction of groundwater resources and deterioration of water quality. The evaluation index system of groundwater resources and groundwater quality is established. The single index zoning map is drawn by GIS software, and the weight of each index is calculated by analytic hierarchy process and entropy method. Finally, the evaluation result of groundwater sustainable development and utilization is obtained by data superposition. The main results obtained in this paper are as follows: (1) The geological and hydrogeological conditions of Yangzhuang Basin are analyzed in detail. According to the lithologic assemblage and water-rich characteristics of water-bearing media, the groundwater-bearing rocks in the study area are divided into Quaternary loose rock pore water-bearing rocks and Ordovician pore water-bearing rocks. Five types of fractured karst water-bearing rocks of carbonate rocks, upper-middle Cambrian carbonate rocks intercalated with clastic rocks, lower Cambrian clastic rocks intercalated with carbonate rocks, karst fractured water-bearing rocks and metamorphic rocks, and intrusive rocks intercalated with fractured water-bearing rocks are identified, and the related resources and parameters for evaluation are determined. According to the actual situation of the area, seven evaluation indexes, namely, exploitable groundwater resource modulus (F1), natural groundwater recharge resource modulus (F2), water supply degree (F3), groundwater level decline rate (F4), groundwater exploitation potential modulus (F5), spring flow attenuation rate (F6) and groundwater quality grade (F7), were selected to establish the evaluation index system of groundwater sustainable development and utilization. The weight of each index is determined by AHP (subjective method) and entropy method (objective method). Finally, the weighted average value is taken as the weight of the index: F1~0.3075, F2~0.1838, F3~0.0727, F4~0.1248, F5~0.1374, F6~0.1091, F7~0.0647. Among them, the natural groundwater recharge resource module has the greatest influence on the groundwater exploitable resource module. Through collecting data, field investigation and hydrogeological test, the evaluation index data are obtained, and the single index evaluation zoning map is drawn by using GIS. The single index evaluation zoning map is obtained and the single index evaluation is carried out. (4) The data of each index in the study area is superimposed by using GIS software, and the comprehensive evaluation of groundwater sustainable development and utilization is obtained. The comprehensive evaluation results were divided into four grades: 0.8-1.0, 0.6-0.8, 0.4-0.6, 0.2-0.4, which represented the "I-grade-good", "I I-better", "I I I-grade-medium" and "IV-poor" of the sustainable development and utilization of groundwater, respectively. Between 0.0, the sustainable development and utilization of groundwater is "I-grade-good", accounting for 6.99% of the area of the study area, and still has the ability of sustainable development and utilization; the comprehensive index evaluation results of the north-east of Xinzhao fault block and the western margin of Shanting fault block are between 0.2 and 0.4, and the sustainable development and utilization of groundwater is poor, accounting for 25.08% of the total area of the study area, which is not suitable for opening. The results show that Yangzhuang basin in the study area still has the capacity of sustainable development and utilization, sustainable exploitation; Shanting fault block is next, it needs to be properly exploited; Xinzhao fault block is poor, not suitable for exploitation.
【学位授予单位】:成都理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:P641.8
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈超;张亚宾;李洪宝;王斌海;井伯祥;;基于FEFLOW的露天转地下覆盖层渗流分析[J];化工矿物与加工;2017年01期
2 冯瑞;郑百录;李晓龙;;某垃圾场渗滤液在地下水中迁移扩散模拟研究[J];环境影响评价;2016年05期
3 刘辉;王磊;史学峰;;GMS在焦化厂地下水环境影响预测中的应用研究[J];环境科学与管理;2016年03期
4 刘建国;许光照;马学礼;;基于FEFLOW的岩溶管道模型构建方法探讨[J];中国岩溶;2015年06期
5 吴松明;;贵州长冲河铝土矿区大岩矿段岩溶地下水涌水量预测[J];桂林理工大学学报;2014年03期
6 胡敏;刘心雨;;基于层次分析法的江苏省城市资源环境承载力的综合评价[J];经济研究导刊;2013年35期
7 李涛;王苏健;李文平;邓增社;常金源;;干旱缺水矿区采空区储水条件及储水时序研究[J];煤炭工程;2013年S1期
8 王红旗;田雅楠;孙静雯;张亚夫;;基于集对分析的内蒙古自治区资源环境承载力评价研究[J];北京师范大学学报(自然科学版);2013年Z1期
9 刘佩贵;陶月赞;;均衡法评价地下水可开采量的风险率[J];吉林大学学报(地球科学版);2012年04期
10 袁婷;邓英尔;蒋欢欢;;岷江犍为水电站库区右岸塘坝煤矿涌水量研究[J];地下水;2012年01期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 陈江;基于多指标体系的呼和浩特平原地下水可持续性研究[D];中国地质科学院;2012年
2 邹君;湖南生态水资源系统脆弱性评价及其可持续开发利用研究[D];湖南师范大学;2010年
3 施枫芝;我国北方中小流域地下水可持续开采量的研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 朱玲燕;基于系统动力学的典型喀斯特地区水资源承载力评价研究[D];重庆师范大学;2016年
2 郑哲敏;基于直觉模糊层次分析法的邯郸市水资源承载力评价研究[D];河北工程大学;2015年
3 李彬;新疆清河县顿巴斯套金矿矿井涌水量预测及突水危险性评价[D];西南交通大学;2014年
4 吴琦;基于因子熵值法的上市公司绩效评价研究[D];大连交通大学;2013年
5 李肖兰;广饶县地下水资源可持续开发利用研究[D];济南大学;2012年
6 蔡保新;富源县大河煤矿区富煤三矿、四矿水文地质条件研究[D];昆明理工大学;2011年
7 白雪峰;大庆市水资源可持续利用研究[D];东北农业大学;2011年
8 罗敏;岩溶蓄水构造区隧道涌突水量计算探析[D];成都理工大学;2011年
9 韩博;县域资源环境承载力评价研究[D];云南大学;2010年
10 王学恭;甘肃省水资源可持续利用评价研究[D];西北师范大学;2009年
,本文编号:2179692
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2179692.html