景谷6.6级、鲁甸6.5级地震序列应力降变化对比研究
[Abstract]:Using the waveform and phase data of Yunnan Jinggu M = 6.6 earthquake sequence on October 7, 2014 and Ludian M = 6.5 earthquake sequence on August 3, 2014, the regional seismic wave attenuation and the site response of the station are eliminated, and the stress drop of the two earthquake sequences is calculated. The results show that the stress drop increases with the increase of magnitude. In order to eliminate the influence of magnitude on the stress drop as far as possible, the stress drop of the same magnitude earthquake is compared. The results show that the average stress drop of the Jinggu earthquake sequence is obviously higher than that of the Ludian earthquake. This may be related to the stress state in the focal area after two earthquakes with magnitude 6.5 or so. From the point of view of the stress drop of the sequence aftershocks, the variation of the stress drop after the Jinggu earthquake (M = 6.6) and before the aftershock with M = 5.890 M = 5.9 on December 6, 2014 shows a slow decrease, then a turning point and a continuous high value. The high stress drop earthquakes are mainly concentrated in the region of strong aftershocks with M = 5.8 in space. This indicates that after a relatively short period of adjustment after the occurrence of the main shock, the stress environment in the focal area of the strong aftershock with M = 5.8 may continue to strengthen. After the occurrence of the strong aftershock with M = 5.8 or M = 5.9, the stress drop of the earthquake sequence rapidly decreases to a relatively stable state. The results show that after two strong aftershocks with magnitude 6 or so, the regional stress near the earthquake source is released to a certain extent, the stress environment decreases, and the earthquake sequence activities tend to end. For the Ludian earthquake sequence with no strong aftershocks, the aftershock stress drop is smaller than the average stress drop of the same magnitude earthquake in Jinggu earthquake sequence, and the stress drop of the aftershock sequence after the main earthquake almost does not change much in time. Combined with the characteristics of the energy release of the main shock, it is inferred that the stress in the focal area has been released more during the rupture process of the main shock, and the stress variation in the focal area has gradually recovered after the main earthquake, which may be due to the obvious weakness of the aftershock activity of the Ludian earthquake. No strong aftershocks have occurred since then.
【作者单位】: 中国地震局地震预测研究所;中国地震台网中心;
【基金】:中国地震局监测预报司2016年度任务性科技专项(1640401320716)资助
【分类号】:P315
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 肖蔚文,黄琦,王荣君;不同地震区应力降分布与分形特征[J];地震学报;1992年03期
2 王培玲;姚家骏;刘文邦;马玉虎;夏爱国;;玉树地区两次强震序列应力降对比研究[J];内陆地震;2013年04期
3 臧绍先;地震应力降与岩石破裂应力降[J];地震学报;1984年02期
4 吕培苓;刘连柱;;1981年邢台5.8级强余震前后小地震的应力降估计[J];华北地震科学;1986年02期
5 卓钰如,刘韬;京津地区小地震(1986—1988)的应力降分布[J];地震;1989年06期
6 万永革;;根据大地震前后应力轴偏转和应力降求取应力量值的研究[J];地震学报;2006年05期
7 黄怀勇;地震应力降的讨论[J];地球物理学报;1978年04期
8 金亚夫;云南省及其邻区部分中强地震应力降特征[J];地震研究;1984年02期
9 王绳祖;震源应力降、错动速度及突发失稳判据[J];地震地质;1990年03期
10 刘韬,卓钰如;京津地区小震(1986—1989)应力降分布[J];地震;1991年01期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 何昌荣;张流;;不同摩擦理论下单自由度系统中刚度对应力降的影响[A];中国地震学会第五次学术大会论文摘要集[C];1994年
2 万永革;;根据强震前后三维应力方向变化和地震应力降估计构造应力量值[A];中国地球物理第二十一届年会论文集[C];2005年
3 施行觉;赵冬林;郭自强;;双剪摩擦滑动的实验和分析[A];第四届全国构造物理、第二届全国高温高压联合学术讨论会论文摘要[C];1989年
4 郭增建;秦保燕;荣代潞;;组合模式和应力降与地震预报[A];1998年中国地球物理学会第十四届学术年会论文集[C];1998年
5 马胜利;王凯英;陈顺云;陈国强;扈小燕;;应力扰动对摩擦滑动影响的实验研究[A];中国地球物理学会第22届年会论文集[C];2006年
,本文编号:2286900
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2286900.html