断裂活动中的瞬时流场及断裂的输导性研究:以库车前陆盆地克拉苏冲断带为例
[Abstract]:The open fault during the active period will affect the distribution of the formation flow field. How to restore the instantaneous flow field in the fault activity and how to quantitatively evaluate the conductivity of the fault during the active period is still a weak link in the study of the relationship between the fault and the fluid migration. This paper attempts to use the numerical simulation method, on the basis of the establishment of heterogeneous geological model, under the condition that the initial flow field before fault activity and the final flow field after fault activity are known, the permeability coefficient, which is the key parameter that affects the formation flow field, is constantly adjusted. Finally, the transient flow field and the permeability of the fault active period are obtained, which are consistent with the final flow field. Taking the Klassou thrust belt of Kuqa Foreland Basin as an example, the simulation results show that relatively high gas uplift appears at the top of the active fault, and the fluid tends to migrate to the surrounding rock, which is the release area of the fluid. At the bottom of the fault, there is a "U" zigzag concave with relatively low gas potential, which is the suction area of the fluid, the vertical gas potential gradient of the fault zone decreases and the dynamic force of the vertical migration of the fluid weakens, but because of the high permeability of the fault zone, it can make up for the lack of the dynamic force. Under the action of pump suction, deep natural gas can be transported to the top of the fault. The different action intensity of "pump suction" of different faults determines which faults will become the main "gas source faults" and the enrichment degree of gas reservoirs with fault as the migration channel. The permeability of the underlying F2-k fault in Kela 2 gas reservoir is 24.9 渭 m ~ (2), which is obviously higher than that of the low F _ 3 fault of Da Bei _ 1 gas reservoir 5.78 脳 10 ~ (-3) 渭 m ~ (2), which is the main reason for the difference of enrichment degree between the two reservoirs.
【作者单位】: 西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室;西北大学地质学系;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金项目(41672121) 西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室开放课题基金项目
【分类号】:P618.13
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗志立;试论中国型(C-型)冲断带及其油气勘探问题[J];石油与天然气地质;1984年04期
2 周新源,罗金海,王清华;塔里木盆地南缘冲断带构造特征及其油气地质特征[J];中国科学(D辑:地球科学);2004年S1期
3 李明杰,谢结来,潘良云;祁连山北缘冲断带西段构造特征[J];地学前缘;2005年04期
4 金文正;汤良杰;杨克明;万桂梅;吕志洲;;龙门山冲断带构造特征研究主要进展及存在问题探讨[J];地质论评;2008年01期
5 谢玉华;赵坤;周建勋;王利;王雪芹;;地表几何形态对冲断带构造特征影响的物理模拟实验研究[J];沉积与特提斯地质;2010年01期
6 李浩武;邬光辉;史玲玲;汪斌;高力;;塔里木盆地西部玛东冲断带构造特征与形成演化[J];新疆地质;2013年03期
7 何钊,边步;北天山山前冲断带及找油前景[J];新疆石油地质;1987年04期
8 侯宇光;汪新文;吴立群;樊浩;;桂中坳陷北部河池—宜山褶皱—冲断带分析[J];现代地质;2009年03期
9 李智武;刘树根;陈洪德;刘顺;郭兵;田小彬;;龙门山冲断带分段-分带性构造格局及其差异变形特征[J];成都理工大学学报(自然科学版);2008年04期
10 程晓敢;黄智斌;陈汉林;杜治利;李康;师骏;;西昆仑山前冲断带断裂特征及构造单元划分[J];岩石学报;2012年08期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 周新源;;塔里木盆地南缘及阿尔金—西昆仑山前冲断带构造特征及其油气地质特征[A];塔里木及周边地区盆地(山)动力学与油气聚集学术研讨会论文摘要集[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 彭冬梅;山前冲断带构造解释技术[N];中国石油报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 程晓敢;祁连山北缘冲断带构造特征研究[D];浙江大学;2006年
2 李智武;中—新生代大巴山前陆盆地—冲断带的形成演化[D];成都理工大学;2006年
3 王春阳;塔西南褶皱—冲断带变形控制因素物理模拟研究[D];浙江大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张梦男;帕米尔东北缘山前冲断带时空差异及其机制[D];浙江大学;2015年
2 吕志洲;龙门山冲断带构造特征与油气勘探前景研究[D];成都理工大学;2008年
,本文编号:2332109
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2332109.html