辽东黄花甸地区古元古代花岗质岩浆作用及其地质意义
[Abstract]:A large number of ancient Gu Yuan granitic rocks were exposed in Huanghuadian area of the Jiao-Liaoji-Jiguo Paleoproterozoic orogenic / active belt, and the granitic rocks in this area were generally called granitic melange. Based on detailed field geological investigation and laboratory comprehensive study, the granitic melange is disintegrated into two types of granitoids, biotite monzogranite and granodiorite, which are of completely different ages and properties. Among them, biotite monomorphic granites are of block, stripe and gneiss types, all of which are rich in SiO_2 (72.37%) and poor in Al_2O_3 (11.6910%, 13.21%), and are rich in SiO_2 (77.44%) and poor in Al_2O_3 (13.21%). The content of Na_2O/K_2O=0.64~1.08,TiO_2 is between 0.18% and 0.34%, and the contents of MnO,MgO and P_2O_5 are lower, 0.01and 0.07%, respectively. 0.12 0.32% and 0.01% respectively. The aluminum saturation index (A/CNK) was distributed in the range of 1.33 ~ 1.45 and the A/NK was in the range of 1.49 ~ 2.60, belonging to the peraluminous high-potassium calc-alkaline series. The trace element Sr,Ba,Ti,P is strongly depleted and has obvious negative Eu anomaly, which is characterized by A-type granite. The zircon of biotite monzonitic granite is mostly magmatic zircon with clear concussion ring structure. The U-Pb harmonic age of LA-ICP-MS zircon is 2185 卤29 Ma, 2183 卤13 Ma, 2166 卤10 Ma, respectively, from three samples. According to the zircon age (1.95~2.15Ga) of the South Liaohe Group, it is believed that the emplacement age of biotite monzogranites is earlier than that of the South Liaohe Group, which constitutes the basement of the South Liaohe Group. The granodiorite intruded into the formation of biotite monzogranite and Lianyu formation in the form of branching, rich in SiO_2 (72.54 and 74.31%), Al_2O_3 (15.01%) and K _ 2O Na_2O (7.77% on average). Relative sodium rich (Na_2O/K_2O=1.27~2.82), poor calcium, magnesium, MgO were 0.26% Cao, the average value of Mg# was 54.0, and the A/CNK of aluminum saturation index was 1.61 ~ 1.78, respectively. A/NK is between 1.49 and 2.60, belongs to peraluminous calc-alkaline series, with obvious positive Eu anomaly, low Y/Yb, high Sr/Y, and strong loss of Th,Ta,Nb,Ti and other high field strength elements, enriched Ba,K,Rb,. Sr and other low field elements have the characteristics of adakitic granite. The zircon of granodiorite is mostly magmatic zircon with clear concussion ring structure. The U-Pb age of LAICP-MS zircon obtained from two samples is 1995 卤18Ma1995 卤13Ma. It can be inferred that the emplacement age of granodiorite is about 2.0Ga. In this paper, it is considered that the black cloud monzogranite with A-type characteristics is the product of partial melting of the lower crust in the process of extensional thinning and splitting of the continental block. The granodiorite with adakitic characteristics is the product of volcanic arc or active continental margin magma formed during subduction. The above studies indicate that the Jiao-Liaojianguo Proterozoic orogenic / active belt may have undergone the process of tensile cracking around 2.2~2.15Ga and the tectonic evolution of subduction and compression around 2.0Ga.
【作者单位】: 吉林大学地球科学学院;中国地质科学院地质研究所;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金重点项目(41430210) 中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD20160121)联合资助
【分类号】:P588.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 白瑾;华北原地台古元古代热力活动遗迹及其构造边界意义[J];岩石学报;2000年01期
2 王惠初,修群业,袁桂邦;内蒙古呼和浩特北部古元古代二道洼群的变质演化[J];前寒武纪研究进展;1999年04期
3 黄圭成,汪雄武,杨世义,陈龙清,凌井生;两广云开隆起区存在中-古元古代基底的年代学证据[J];中国区域地质;2001年02期
4 李江海;刘守偈;侯贵廷;;华北中部古元古代末期构造-热事件性质及其构造成因模式[J];中国地质;2006年06期
5 沈保丰;翟安民;杨春亮;;古元古代-中国重要的成矿期[J];地质调查与研究;2010年04期
6 辛后田;赵凤清;罗照华;刘永顺;万渝生;王树庆;;塔里木盆地东南缘阿克塔什塔格地区古元古代精细年代格架的建立及其地质意义[J];地质学报;2011年12期
7 田永清,苗培森;中国古元古代年代地层再划分的若干问题与建议[J];现代地质;1999年02期
8 何世平;李荣社;王超;张宏飞;计文化;于浦生;辜平阳;时超;;青藏高原拉萨地块发现古元古代地体[J];地球科学(中国地质大学学报);2013年03期
9 陈荣度,李显东,张福生;对辽东古元古代地质若干问题的讨论[J];中国地质;2003年02期
10 李三忠,郝德峰,韩宗珠,赵国春,孙敏;胶辽地块古元古代构造-热演化与深部过程[J];地质学报;2003年03期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 孔凡凡;袁训来;周传明;尹磊明;;古元古代冰期事件:山西五台地区滹沱群的碳同位素证据[A];全国微体古生物学分会第九届会员代表大会暨第十四次学术年会、全国化石藻类专业委员会第七届会员代表大会暨第十五次学术讨论会论文摘要集[C];2012年
2 吉成林;赖兴运;王仁民;;恒山东段古元古代表壳岩层序的特征和成因[A];中国地质科学院地质研究所文集(25)[C];1993年
3 赵瑞幅;郭敬辉;彭澎;刘富;;恒山地区古元古代2.1 Ga地壳重熔事件:钾质花岗岩锆石U-Pb定年及Hf-Nd同位素研究[A];中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所第11届(2011年度)学术年会论文集(上)[C];2012年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 路孝平;通化地区古元古代构造岩浆事件[D];吉林大学;2004年
2 邴志波;辽东古元古代岩石圈结构与演化[D];吉林大学;2006年
3 赵凤清;山西中条山地区古元古代地壳演化的年代学和地球化学制约[D];中国地质大学(北京);2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 王海培;新疆库鲁克塔格地区古元古代花岗岩成因[D];新疆大学;2016年
2 张建中;山西吕梁山北段古元古代地层对比研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2007年
3 汪晶;华北东、西板块的古元古代拼合[D];中国地质大学;2010年
4 王靓靓;辽吉朝古元古代褶皱带构造格架与矿产分布规律[D];中国地质大学(北京);2010年
5 陈龙;桃园铜矿古元古代岩浆岩地球化学特征[D];石家庄经济学院;2014年
,本文编号:2410097
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/2410097.html