基于现代分析技术对河南淅川单岗陶器进行的研究

发布时间：2018-02-20 21:29

  本文关键词： 单岗遗址陶器 X射线荧光光谱 物理性能 烧成温度 X射线衍射仪 扫描电子显微镜　出处：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：河南淅川单岗遗址位于丹江流域,其优越的地理位置也促使了当地文化的繁盛。单岗遗址自1994年发现以来,历经数次发掘,已取得了丰硕的成果,但目前仍未有利用现代分析技术对单岗遗址陶器进行的研究。为了探究单岗遗址陶器的特点,本文选取了屈家岭和周代的一些陶器样品,利用现代分析技术对这些陶器进行研究,以探索各时期陶器之间的关系。本文利用X射线荧光光谱测量了所有所选取陶器样品的化学组分,然后利用多元统计分析中的因子分析、判别分析和系统聚类分析对所得数据进行处理,得出各时期样品的原料来源;利用空隙仪和热膨胀仪测量了部分样品的物理性能和烧成温度,以探索各时期样品的烧制工艺差别;利用X射线衍射仪对各时期部分样品进行了物相分析,以确定各时期样品的矿物组成;利用扫描电镜观察所选取样品的显微结构得出样品的微观形貌。得出的结论如下:屈家岭和周代各时期样品的原料来源基本相同但相对比较分散,相对来说,西周晚期样品的原料来源和其他时期稍有不同。说明屈家岭和周代各时期当地人居住的比较分散,但距离不是太远,西周晚期时当地人的居住地可能与其他时期稍有不同,但距离不远。屈家岭和西周晚期样品的吸水率和空隙率较大,春秋早、春秋中、春秋晚和战国早期样品的吸水率和空隙率较小,说明屈家岭和西周晚期样品的致密性低于其他时期。且各时期内样品的吸水率、空隙率、表面密度和体积密度差异较大,说明各时期内样品的烧制工艺也有较大差别。屈家岭和周代各时期样品的烧成温度基本都在850℃到1050℃之间,屈家岭时期到西周晚期,陶器的烧制工艺并没有大的变化,样品的烧成温度都在900℃左右,烧制工艺基本相同,劣于春秋早、春秋中、春秋晚和战国早期陶器的烧制工艺。屈家岭和周代各时期样品的主要矿物成分都为石英,还含有一些长石类矿物、尖晶橄榄石、镁铝榴石、钙铝榴石、铁铝榴石、橄榄石和硅线石等矿物,其中以长石类矿物居多。屈家岭和周代各时期陶器样品的微观形貌非常相似,含有大量的石英颗粒,样品中含有大量的孔洞,烧结程度较差,空隙较多,结构比较疏松。
[Abstract]:The Dan-gang site in Xichuan, Henan Province, is located in the Danjiang River Basin, and its superior geographical location has also contributed to the prosperity of local culture. Since its discovery in 1994, the site has been excavated several times and has achieved fruitful results. In order to explore the characteristics of the pottery, this paper selects some pottery samples from Qujialing and Zhou dynasties. Modern analytical techniques are used to study these pottery in order to explore the relationship between them. In this paper, the chemical components of all selected pottery samples have been measured by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Then the data are processed by factor analysis, discriminant analysis and systematic cluster analysis, and the source of raw materials is obtained. The physical properties and sintering temperature of some samples were measured by means of voidometer and thermal expansion instrument to explore the difference of sintering process in each period, and the phase analysis of some samples was carried out by means of X-ray diffractometer. To determine the mineral composition of the samples during each period; The microstructure of the selected samples was obtained by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The conclusions are as follows: the raw materials of the samples in Qujialing and Zhou dynasties were basically the same but relatively dispersed. The source of raw materials in the late Western Zhou Dynasty is slightly different from that in other periods. It shows that the local people lived in different periods in Qujialing and Zhou dynasties, but the distance is not too far. The local people's residence in the late Western Zhou Dynasty may be slightly different from that in other periods. However, the distance is not far. The water absorption and void rate of the samples in Qujialing and the late Western Zhou period are relatively large, and the water absorption and void rates of the samples in the early spring and autumn, in the middle of the spring and autumn, in the late spring and autumn and in the early warring States period are relatively small. The results showed that the densification of the samples in Qujialing and the late Western Zhou period was lower than that in other periods, and the water absorption, porosity, surface density and volume density of the samples varied greatly in each period. The sintering temperature of samples in Qujialing period and Zhou Dynasty was basically between 850 鈩，

本文编号：1520070