黑岱沟露天煤矿不同复垦模式效益分析与评价

发布时间：2018-03-25 10:34

本文选题：黑岱沟　切入点：露天煤矿　出处：《中国矿业》2017年12期

【摘要】：本研究以黑岱沟露天煤矿为研究对象,通过研究草灌乔结合、草灌、灌木、牧草和农田复垦模式,对不同复垦模式进行了投资效益分析与评价。结果表明:牧草复垦模式投资成本最低,草灌乔复垦模式和欧李复垦模式投资成本较高;对不同复垦模式综合分析对比,不同复垦模式各具特点;综合分析生态效果、投资成本、土地条件要求、生物价值和财务能力,认为牧草复垦模式和欧李复垦模式优势明显,农作物复垦模式劣势明显;考虑到在可利用耕地的作用效果,农作物复垦模式优势明显,直接增加了可利用耕地面积;草灌乔复垦模式提升复垦区生态系统稳定性上效果最佳。因此,各种复垦模式优缺点明显,需要根据实际情况斟酌使用。
[Abstract]:This study took Heidaigou opencast coal mine as the research object, through the research grass irrigation tree union, the grass irrigation, the shrub, the forage grass and the farmland reclamation model, The investment benefit of different reclamation models was analyzed and evaluated. The results showed that the investment cost of forage reclamation model was the lowest, and the investment cost of grass irrigated reclaimed model and European plum reclaimed model was higher, and the comprehensive analysis and comparison of different reclamation models were carried out. According to the analysis of ecological effect, investment cost, land condition requirement, biological value and financial ability, it is concluded that forage reclamation model and Euler reclamation model have obvious advantages, and crop reclamation model has obvious disadvantages. Considering the effect of available cultivated land, crop reclamation model has obvious advantage, which directly increases the usable cultivated land area, and the grass irrigation and Joe reclamation model has the best effect on improving the ecosystem stability of reclaimed land. The advantages and disadvantages of various reclamation models are obvious and need to be used according to the actual situation.
【作者单位】：内蒙古农业大学;神华准格尔能源有限责任公司;
【基金】：内蒙古自然科学基金项目资助(编号:2014MS0117) 神华集团科技创新项目资助(编号:SH-ZY-05-04)
【分类号】：TD88

【相似文献】