当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 矿业工程论文 >

混凝—超滤联用处理矿井水的试验研究

发布时间:2018-04-30 12:47

  本文选题:矿井水 + 混凝 ; 参考:《西安科技大学》2016年硕士论文


【摘要】:矿井水是采煤伴生废水,在干旱的矿区存在着用水不足现象。如何有效地去处理和利用大量的矿井水对矿区用水补给、减少水资源浪费具有重要意义。混凝,作为污水处理的传统预处理单元具有很好的净水效果,在水处理中得到广泛且有效的应用。超滤膜的深度处理使得出水的各项指标进一步得到优化。两者联用可优化对矿井水的处理效果。但混凝条件的不可控性和超滤过程中的膜污染问题还有待进一步研究。本研究以某矿区矿井水作为研究对象,考察混凝、混凝—超滤对矿井水SS、COD的去除效果和超滤过程中膜通量的变化,分析混凝剂的投加对超滤膜污染的影响,通过对水样进出水分子量分布、亲疏水性和膜污染层结构的表征,探讨混凝—超滤处理矿井水的机理。研究结果如下:(1)在混凝试验中,四种混凝剂分别与矿井水在不同剂量、不同pH值、不同混凝时间下混凝沉淀,比较得出:PFS的混凝效果较其混凝剂好,对SS和COD的去除率分别为92%、70%。对COD去除效果差,有待深度处理。通过对Zeta电位、絮体形貌和絮体尺寸进行研究和分析进一步得出:加入PFS后,溶液Zeta电位靠近等电点。加入PFC后,形成絮体呈支状结构,且强度较大。Zeta电位对混凝效果起决定作用。(2)混凝—超滤试验中,分别对跨膜压差、过滤方式、耦合方式、混凝剂投加量等进行分析得出:向矿井水中投加30mg/L的混凝剂PFC混凝反应1小时后,混凝液在0.1MPa下进行死端超滤,SS和COD的去除率达到99.9%和94%。混凝试验和混凝—超滤试验最佳混凝剂不同,对比分析可知:混凝过程中Zeta电位起决定性作用,而在混凝—超滤过程中,稳定的支状絮体结构能有效防止膜污染而优化出水水质。(3)在混凝—超滤处理矿井水的试验中,通过对膜污染和膜分离机理的研究表明:混凝—超滤可形成滤饼层而减少不可逆阻力。膜表面污染层中,主要为混凝剂与颗粒物质。混凝—超滤可有效去除疏水性大分子有机物和无机颗粒,对亲水性小分子有机物处理效果不佳。
[Abstract]:Mine water is associated with coal mining wastewater, there is insufficient water in dry mining area. How to deal with and utilize a large amount of mine water effectively is of great significance to supply water and reduce the waste of water resources. Coagulation, as the traditional pretreatment unit of sewage treatment, has good water purification effect, and has been widely and effectively used in water treatment. The advanced treatment of ultrafiltration membrane further optimizes each index of effluent. Combined use of the two can optimize the treatment effect of mine water. However, the uncontrollability of coagulation conditions and membrane fouling in ultrafiltration process need to be further studied. In this study, the removal effect of coagulation, coagulation-ultrafiltration on SSO COD and the change of membrane flux in the process of ultrafiltration were investigated, and the effect of coagulant addition on the fouling of ultrafiltration membrane was analyzed. Based on the characterization of molecular weight distribution, hydrophobicity and membrane fouling layer structure, the mechanism of coagulation-ultrafiltration treatment of mine water was discussed. The results are as follows: (1) in the coagulation experiment, the four coagulants and mine water were coagulated and precipitated in different dosages, different pH values and different coagulation times, respectively. The results showed that the coagulation effect of the coagulant was better than that of the coagulant, and the removal rates of SS and COD were 92% and 70% respectively. The removal effect of COD is poor, and it needs further treatment. Through the study and analysis of Zeta potential, floc morphology and floc size, it is concluded that the solution Zeta potential is close to the isoelectric point after the addition of PFS. After the addition of PFC, the flocs formed into branched structure, and the strength of the flocs was larger. Zeta potential played a decisive role on coagulation effect. In the coagulation-ultrafiltration test, the transmembrane pressure difference, the filtration mode, the coupling mode, respectively, were studied. The analysis of coagulant dosage shows that the removal rate of dead end ultrafiltration SS and COD can reach 99.9% and 94% respectively after the coagulant PFC coagulant is added with 30mg/L in mine water for 1 hour. The best coagulant is different from the coagulation-ultrafiltration test. The comparison and analysis show that the Zeta potential plays a decisive role in the coagulation process, but in the coagulation-ultrafiltration process, The stable branching floc structure can effectively prevent membrane fouling and optimize the effluent quality. 3) in the experiment of coagulation-ultrafiltration treatment of mine water, The study of membrane fouling and membrane separation mechanism shows that coagulation and ultrafiltration can form filter cake layer and reduce irreversible resistance. In the fouling layer of membrane surface, coagulant and granular material are the main components. Coagulation-ultrafiltration can effectively remove hydrophobic macromolecular organic matter and inorganic particles, and the treatment effect of hydrophilic small molecular organic matter is not good.
【学位授予单位】:西安科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:X751

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李伟英;“混凝”新释义及混凝技术[J];工业用水与废水;2001年02期

2 余承烈,宁林红;对混凝过程的几点新认识[J];轻金属;2003年11期

3 湛含辉,张晓琪,罗定提;混凝机理的研究现状及其定义[J];株洲工学院学报;2003年05期

4 湛含辉,张晓琪;混凝过程机理研究及其物理模型[J];选煤技术;2003年05期

5 含辉;混凝(沉降)反应试验成果及研究方向[J];煤炭加工与综合利用;2004年01期

6 张健;;强化混凝处理城市纳污河污水运行过程中搅拌能量的影响[J];环境工程学报;2008年10期

7 刘前军;南军;李圭白;;钢铁总排废水混凝过程的动态监测[J];中国给水排水;2011年21期

8 郭起华;;印染废水混凝过程中磷酸盐作用初探[J];工业水处理;1987年03期

9 王志石;胶体的光学效应及混凝速率的测定[J];清华大学学报(自然科学版);1989年03期

10 王继徽;;制革综合废水混凝处理优化条件研究[J];湖南大学学报(自然科学版);1993年02期

相关会议论文 前5条

1 赵宗升;章双霜;柴峰;贾维靖;;混凝动力学的发展历程[A];2010中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集(第四卷)[C];2010年

2 王晓昌;金鹏康;;水中天然腐植酸的混凝过程和机理研究[A];中国化学会第七届水处理化学大会暨学术研讨会会议论文集[C];2004年

3 邴永鑫;虢清伟;许振成;易皓;崔恺;;预氧化+混凝去除饮用水中高浓度铊的工艺研究[A];中国环境科学学会学术年会光大环保优秀论文集(2014)[C];2014年

4 邴永鑫;虢清伟;许振成;易皓;崔恺;;预氧化+混凝去除饮用水中高浓度铊的工艺研究[A];2014中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集(第五章)[C];2014年

5 关小红;李朝阳;王琪;;As(Ⅴ)/As(Ⅲ)在FeCl_3混凝过程中的行为比较[A];第六届全国环境化学大会暨环境科学仪器与分析仪器展览会摘要集[C];2011年

相关博士学位论文 前10条

1 唐晓e,

本文编号:1824615


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/kuangye/1824615.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户55954***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com