四方金矿采矿方法的AHP-TOPSIS评判模型法优选

发布时间：2018-06-07 04:37

本文选题：层次分析法 + 逼近理想解排序法　；参考：《金属矿山》2017年01期

【摘要】：针对目前"经验类比法"确定采矿方法过分依赖采矿人员的经验,无法定量分析等问题,以四方金矿为工程背景,利用层次分析法(AHP)和逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)建立AHP-TOPSIS采矿方法优选模型,对初选的4种采矿方法进行综合评判,4种采矿方法与理想解的贴进度分别为0.266,0.479,0.421,0.533,确定第4种采矿方法(无底柱分段崩落法)最优。评判结果与矿山目前采用的采矿方法一致,表明AHP-TOPSIS采矿方法优选模型能有效地用于工程实践,同时也表明无底柱分段崩落法开采高价值矿种也是合适的,拓展了此采矿方法的运用范围。
[Abstract]:In view of the problems of "experience analogy" in determining the mining method relying too much on the experience of the miners and not in quantitative analysis, the paper takes Sifang Gold Mine as the engineering background. The optimal selection model of AHP-TOPSIS mining method is established by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and approximate ideal solution ranking method (TopSISs). This paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of the four primary mining methods and the attachment progress of the four mining methods and the ideal solution are 0.266g / 0.479 / 0.421/ 0.533, respectively. It is determined that the fourth mining method (sublevel caving method without bottom pillar) is the best. The result of evaluation is consistent with the mining method used at present, which shows that the optimal selection model of AHP-TOPSIS mining method can be used effectively in engineering practice, and that the sublevel caving method without bottom pillar is also suitable for mining high value minerals. The range of application of this mining method is expanded.
【作者单位】：西安建筑科技大学材料与矿资学院;紫金矿业集团股份有限公司;
【分类号】：TD863

【相似文献】