基于政社企关系再造视角下煤炭资源收益共享研究
发布时间:2018-07-27 10:35
【摘要】:经济利益的核心问题是在不同的利益主体之间合理分配。政社企作为基本的利益主体,三者具有密切的关系。一般来说,政府是社会治理的主体,为公众服务;企业是经济发展的微观主体,促进经济发展;社会是一个有机整体,代表个体间的存在关系的总和以及所在环境。而围绕煤炭资源收益形成的政社企主体则具有更为复杂的性质。由于煤炭资源的开发不同于一般的工业品制造:煤炭资源开发涉及到代际资源配置,需要协调和后代之间的关系;煤炭资源开发对长期的环境破坏,导致地区非资源产业特别是制造业的挤出,严重滞后资源地的工业化进程,却不通过市场机制解决。传统政企关系下,煤炭资源收益共享的方式具有局限性,作为煤炭资源的管理者政府,缺乏对超额资源收益的管控,注重资源节约和能源安全,单纯控制企业生产量,忽视煤炭在代际配置上的效率性,不能解决资源开采带来的负外部性;企业发展也严重依赖资源,生产效率低。同时,相关利益群体难以真正受益,特别是社会主体中的资源地环境、居民。致使政府、企业、社会间利益纠纷迭起,中央与地方、地方与企业之间权益博弈矛盾不断,后代、环境、地区经济等方面的利益没有充分考虑。因此在这样的关系下,这种经济发展模式不论在资源使用效率上还是在功能设计的合理性上,都会逐渐带来经济发展问题。在新时期,应该对政社企关系进行再造,在建立新型政企关系下构建现代化的煤炭资源收益共享实现路径,政府加强对超额资源收益的管控,社会相关利益主体直接参与资源收益的初次分配,企业发展从资源依赖转化为多元发展,真正使资源要素的使用配置达到最优。
[Abstract]:The core problem of economic interest is the rational distribution among different interest subjects. As the basic interest subject, the three have close relationship. Generally speaking, the government is the main body of social governance and serves the public; the enterprise is the microcosmic subject of economic development, which promotes economic development; the society is an organic whole, representing the sum of the relationships between individuals and the environment in which they exist. But the main body of government, society and enterprise formed around the coal resource income has more complex nature. Since the exploitation of coal resources is different from that of industrial products in general: the exploitation of coal resources involves the allocation of intergenerational resources and needs to be coordinated with the relationship between future generations, and the exploitation of coal resources causes long-term environmental damage. It leads to the extrusion of non-resource industries, especially the manufacturing industry, which seriously lags behind the industrialization process of natural resources, but does not solve through the market mechanism. Under the traditional relationship between government and enterprise, the mode of coal resource income sharing is limited. As the manager of coal resource, the government lacks the control of excess resource income, pays attention to resource saving and energy security, and simply controls the production of enterprise. Ignoring the efficiency of intergenerational allocation of coal can not solve the negative externality brought by the exploitation of resources, and the development of enterprises depends heavily on resources and the production efficiency is low. At the same time, it is difficult for the relevant interest groups to benefit, especially the resources, environment and residents in the social subject. As a result, the interests disputes among government, enterprise and society are in succession, and the interests of central and local governments, local governments and enterprises are not fully considered, and the interests of future generations, environment, regional economy and so on are not fully considered. Therefore, in such a relationship, this mode of economic development will gradually bring problems of economic development, whether in the efficiency of resource use or in the rationality of functional design. In the new period, we should rebuild the relationship between government, society and enterprise, construct a modern way to realize the sharing of coal resources revenue under the establishment of a new relationship between government and enterprises, and strengthen the government's control over the excess resources income. Social stakeholders directly participate in the initial allocation of resource income, and the development of enterprises is transformed from resource dependence to pluralistic development, which really makes the use and allocation of resource elements optimal.
【学位授予单位】:山西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F426.21
本文编号:2147549
[Abstract]:The core problem of economic interest is the rational distribution among different interest subjects. As the basic interest subject, the three have close relationship. Generally speaking, the government is the main body of social governance and serves the public; the enterprise is the microcosmic subject of economic development, which promotes economic development; the society is an organic whole, representing the sum of the relationships between individuals and the environment in which they exist. But the main body of government, society and enterprise formed around the coal resource income has more complex nature. Since the exploitation of coal resources is different from that of industrial products in general: the exploitation of coal resources involves the allocation of intergenerational resources and needs to be coordinated with the relationship between future generations, and the exploitation of coal resources causes long-term environmental damage. It leads to the extrusion of non-resource industries, especially the manufacturing industry, which seriously lags behind the industrialization process of natural resources, but does not solve through the market mechanism. Under the traditional relationship between government and enterprise, the mode of coal resource income sharing is limited. As the manager of coal resource, the government lacks the control of excess resource income, pays attention to resource saving and energy security, and simply controls the production of enterprise. Ignoring the efficiency of intergenerational allocation of coal can not solve the negative externality brought by the exploitation of resources, and the development of enterprises depends heavily on resources and the production efficiency is low. At the same time, it is difficult for the relevant interest groups to benefit, especially the resources, environment and residents in the social subject. As a result, the interests disputes among government, enterprise and society are in succession, and the interests of central and local governments, local governments and enterprises are not fully considered, and the interests of future generations, environment, regional economy and so on are not fully considered. Therefore, in such a relationship, this mode of economic development will gradually bring problems of economic development, whether in the efficiency of resource use or in the rationality of functional design. In the new period, we should rebuild the relationship between government, society and enterprise, construct a modern way to realize the sharing of coal resources revenue under the establishment of a new relationship between government and enterprises, and strengthen the government's control over the excess resources income. Social stakeholders directly participate in the initial allocation of resource income, and the development of enterprises is transformed from resource dependence to pluralistic development, which really makes the use and allocation of resource elements optimal.
【学位授予单位】:山西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F426.21
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈宗胜;;克服供给侧缺陷,保持经济中高速增长[J];经济研究参考;2016年13期
2 李砚忠;;治理现代化视域下的政社企关系再造——《经济社会体制比较》杂志创刊30周年座谈会暨“国家治理现代化:政社企关系再造”研讨会综述[J];经济社会体制比较;2016年01期
3 韩保江;;依法建立好的市场经济[J];理论视野;2015年01期
4 唐贤衡;;矿业城市可持续发展理论探析[J];经营管理者;2014年06期
5 刘尚希;朱长才;叶翠青;朱克俊;程丹润;汪文志;张学诞;刑丽;施文泼;陈龙;周象民;赵慧;梁洪波;崔更发;史生荣;洪萨茹拉;范亚平;孙长杰;李蕾;张博;孙晴;苏新泉;武永义;周正;李享林;范伟;;资源税、房产税改革及对地方财政影响分析[J];经济研究参考;2013年21期
6 宋迎法;吴晓兰;;企业、政府与社会关系的研究:文献述评[J];理论月刊;2012年06期
7 徐晓亮;许学芬;;资源税税率设置分析、比较和选择[J];自然资源学报;2012年01期
8 周伟;武康平;;个税免征额、税率与拉弗曲线[J];经济学家;2011年10期
9 张炳雷;;国有企业承担社会责任的政府规制研究[J];中国行政管理;2011年05期
10 邓泽宏;何应龙;;企业社会责任运动中的政府作用研究[J];中国行政管理;2010年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张硕;政府与企业关系研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
,本文编号:2147549
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/kuangye/2147549.html