不同类型采场冲击地压危险预测体系研究
[Abstract]:In recent years, with more and more mines entering deep mining in our country, coal mine rock burst has become one of the main obstacles to safe production and personal safety of underground workers in our country and even in the world. At present, many deep-well mines in China have adopted large strip mining due to ground coal pressure and other reasons. Both sides of the first mining face are usually solid coal, and then one side of the goaf, two sides of the goaf and even the "isolated island" face will be mined. The stress field of the working face under different boundary conditions is very different, and the risk of rock burst is also very different. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a unified prediction system of rock burst risk by combining different types of stope and considering all the factors that affect the impact rock pressure. By using the methods of theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of overlying rock space structure and key strata, the paper makes a horizontal comparison on the spatial structure form, movement rule and stress field distribution of several different types of stope in Chaoyang Coal Mine. It can directly reflect the difference of stress field at different types of mining site and the risk of rock burst. At the same time, for the first time, the difference of rock pressure risk of different types of stope is combined with many factors that affect the impact of rock pressure accident, and a unified prediction system of rock burst risk is established. It breaks the previous single prediction system applicable to a particular mining condition and stope type. In addition, the paper also makes use of the prediction system based on different stope types to predict the impact risk area of 3201 face in Chaoyang Coal Mine. Combined with the existing monitoring results of micro-earthquakes and the actual situation of rock burst in the field, the prediction results are verified to ensure the accuracy of the prediction results.
【学位授予单位】:河北工程大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:TD324
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 于正兴;姜福兴;桂兵;;冲击地压危险性的宏观评价方法在“孤岛”工作面的应用[J];矿业安全与环保;2011年05期
2 赵从国,窦林名;波兰冲击矿压防治方法研究[J];江苏煤炭;2004年02期
3 窦林名,谷德钟,曹树刚;冲击矿压及其防治[J];矿山压力与顶板管理;1999年Z1期
4 李化敏;袁瑞甫;李刚锋;;综合指数法中地质条件影响冲击危险指数的探讨[J];煤矿安全;2011年11期
5 岳宁;金思德;张自发;;工作面冲击危险综合指数法评价应用实践[J];煤矿现代化;2011年05期
6 章梦涛;徐曾和;潘一山;赵阳升;;冲击地压和突出的统一失稳理论[J];煤炭学报;1991年04期
7 侯玮;霍海鹰;;“C”型覆岩空间结构采场岩层运动规律及动压致灾机理[J];煤炭学报;2012年S2期
8 许磊;魏世明;;冲击地压发生机理及监测方法现状分析[J];河南科技;2014年01期
9 孙文革;;煤矿冲击地压防治技术探讨[J];山东煤炭科技;2012年03期
10 宋广鹏;;冲击地压发生的判别准则和预防措施[J];太原科技;2006年12期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 王超;基于未确知测度理论的冲击地压危险性综合评价模型及应用研究[D];中国矿业大学;2011年
2 潘立友;冲击地压前兆信息的可识别性研究及应用[D];山东科技大学;2003年
3 成云海;微地震定位监测在采场冲击地压防治中的应用[D];山东科技大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 于先富;龙家堡煤矿冲击地压测控技术研究[D];辽宁工程技术大学;2008年
,本文编号:2463823
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/kuangye/2463823.html