层状盐岩储气库建腔期安全综合评价及多因素优化研究
[Abstract]:Salt rock reservoirs are used as energy storage media at home and abroad because of their excellent properties such as water solubility, good creep, damage self-recovery, low permeability and large plastic deformation capacity, high utilization rate of salt rock caverns, small area occupied, large instantaneous throughput and easy excavation. Surrounding rock mass has better safety, but the salt rock reserve layer in our country has the characteristics of lower salt rock grade, more interbeds, shallow burial, thin rock thickness and so on, and the cavity construction process is invisible, unable to control the shape of the cavity; in the long-term brine immersion, the mechanical properties of salt rock change; insoluble or insoluble interbeds collapse. Salt rock gas storage cavern construction is a complex system engineering, reasonable selection of cavern construction technology and method is possible to get the design form, including the choice of freshwater cycle, the combination of cavity string, the determination of freshwater injection and displacement, roof and floor protection. Protection measures, cavity shape detection, oil cushion position control and supporting ground equipment, etc. Only when these problems are correctly and reasonably solved in the process of cavity construction, can the built cavity meet the requirements of gas storage. The main contents and achievements of this paper are as follows: (1) The principle of water-soluble cavity construction in layered underground gas storage and the technology of single well convection water-soluble cavity construction are analyzed. The main factors affecting the dissolution rate of salt minerals, including the grade of salt minerals, are introduced. The internal factors such as structure, water solubility, composition and solution concentration, movement state, spatial position of solution surface, temperature and pressure, and properties of solvent were simulated. The key factors include: circulation mode, salt rock grade, water injection and discharge, pipe string combination, number of interlayer and position of oil cushion. The simulation results show that the cavity shape is very irregular if the Cavity-making technology is not properly selected. 3. Through in-depth analysis of the typical accident causes of layered salt rock underground gas storage. Combined with the actual geological conditions of Jintan salt cavern gas storage and the influencing factors in the process of cavern construction, the paper analyzes the dangerous sources which may cause the accidents in the cavern construction period of the salt cavern gas storage from the aspects of salt rock and interlayer characteristics, stratum characteristics, cavity design, construction control, supporting facilities and human errors, and establishes the cavern construction of stratified salt rock gas storage. Based on the qualitative analysis of the fault tree, all possible approaches and basic causes of the accident during the cavity construction period are obtained. 4. The risk factors obtained from the fault tree are classified according to their different properties and are divided into three evaluation units, i.e. mechanical parameters of salt rock, interlayer parameters and cavity construction parameters. The safety evaluation system of layered salt rock gas reservoir during cavity construction period is established. Based on the previous experimental research and numerical simulation results of the members of this research group, the index scoring model of the safety evaluation system is established. _Based on variable weight and relative difference function, the safety evaluation of the proposed M well salt rock gas reservoir during cavity construction period is carried out. The index constant weight is adjusted by the variable weight method, and the variable weight is changed with the change of the evaluation value. It can highlight the impact of the obvious change of the evaluation value of individual index on the evaluation results. If the evaluation value of individual index is very low, the weight will be greatly improved after the variable weight treatment. The membership degree of the grade is determined by the relative difference function, which can reflect the importance of some influencing factors in the evaluation system. _According to the three controllable factors of the layered salt gas storage cavern construction period: the position of interlayer (which can be realized by adjusting the buried depth of the cavern), the ratio of height to diameter of the cavern, and the spacing between ore pillars are optimized. The interlayer position has three levels: 1/4H, 3/4H, 1/2. H, in which H is the cavity height; the ratio of height to diameter is set at three levels: 1.0D, 1.5D, 2.0D; the width of pillar is set at three levels: 1.0D, 1.5D, 2.0D, D is the cavity diameter. The stress and the average stress of the interlayer and the displacement of the apex, the bottom, the waist and the interlayer of the cavity are taken as the experimental indexes. The values of height-diameter ratio and pillar width are brought into the evaluation model of height-diameter ratio and pillar width in Chapter 4, and the scores are both 100, which is the best level, which verifies the accuracy of numerical simulation.
【学位授予单位】:重庆大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:TE88
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李果;梁光川;尹平;谢云杰;;储气库的储量估算[J];西南石油大学学报;2007年04期
2 天工;;国家储气库已选定11个地点[J];天然气工业;2010年12期
3 朱荣强;;天然气储气库储气规模的确定[J];山东化工;2013年01期
4 ;我国最大天然气储气库投产[J];供热制冷;2013年08期
5 尹虎琛;陈军斌;兰义飞;刘志军;;北美典型储气库的技术发展现状与启示[J];油气储运;2013年08期
6 ;我国最大天然气储气库投产[J];石油化工腐蚀与防护;2013年05期
7 张旭;;储气库火炬装置系统设计[J];化工管理;2013年22期
8 孙伯英;;世界上最深最大的水层储气库[J];天然气工业;1984年04期
9 王颂秋;多孔性储气库储气压力的探讨[J];煤气与热力;1996年05期
10 武魏楠;;中国储气库的急与慢[J];能源;2013年11期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 李建东;邹红丽;徐维霞;;储气库建设与地热资源开发的关系[A];全国地热产业可持续发展学术研讨会论文集[C];2005年
2 高树生;杨产雷;班凡生;单文文;;岩盐储气库溶腔内夹层数值模拟研究[A];第九届全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集[C];2006年
3 莫江;梁卫国;赵阳升;;层状盐岩储气库建造夹层稳定性研究[A];第十届全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集[C];2008年
4 高延法;张长福;邢飞;;废弃矿井地下空间储气技术分析[A];第三届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集[C];2009年
5 班凡生;朱维耀;单文文;高树生;;岩盐储气库水溶建腔管柱提升优化研究[A];中国力学学会学术大会'2005论文摘要集(下)[C];2005年
6 严铭卿;;压缩天然气储气分区原理[A];《煤气与热力》杂志编辑委员会'2005燃气热力技术研讨会论文集[C];2005年
7 班凡生;熊伟;高树生;单文文;;岩盐储气库水溶建腔影响因素综合分析研究[A];第九届全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集[C];2006年
8 李富国;刘永志;;车用CNG充装站储气规模与装置应用优化探讨Ⅱ[A];全国天然气汽车加气站技术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
9 王同涛;闫相祯;杨秀娟;杨恒林;;多夹层盐岩蠕变实验及盐穴储气库完套管柱受力分析[A];2010年海峡两岸材料破坏/断裂学术会议暨第十届破坏科学研讨会/第八届全国MTS材料试验学术会议论文集[C];2010年
10 李建君;李龙;屈丹安;;盐穴储气库溶腔参数优化方案的研究[A];低碳经济促进石化产业科技创新与发展——第六届宁夏青年科学家论坛论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 汪亚萍 通讯员 王凌梅;大港钻采院成功设计10个储气库[N];中国石油报;2010年
2 蒙辉;采油六厂地下有个天然气“储气库”[N];黑龙江日报;2004年
3 任继凯;储气库:北京平稳用气“福气”之源[N];中国石油报;2007年
4 李健飞;金坛储气库工程打响“上党战役”[N];石油管道报;2006年
5 古柏;大港储气库成功应对华北第一波用气高峰[N];中国建设报;2009年
6 本报记者 骆毅;备战气荒 中石油拟建十大储气库[N];21世纪经济报道;2010年
7 沈素丽;设计公司在中石油首期储气库建设培训班作报告[N];石油管道报;2010年
8 通讯员 陈潇奕;金坛储气库安全设施通过国家验收[N];中国石油报;2008年
9 记者 楚海虹;金坛储气库加快增容增储[N];中国石油报;2009年
10 记者 楚海虹 姜斯雄;科技创新推进金坛储气库建设[N];中国石油报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前7条
1 赵克烈;注采气过程中地下盐岩储气库可用性研究[D];中国科学院研究生院(武汉岩土力学研究所);2009年
2 王同涛;多夹层盐岩体中储气库围岩变形规律及安全性研究[D];中国石油大学;2011年
3 王皆明;裂缝性潜山油藏储气库注采机理研究[D];中国海洋大学;2013年
4 曾顺鹏;高含水后期油藏改建储气库渗流机理及应用研究[D];西南石油学院;2005年
5 赵志成;盐岩储气库水溶建腔流体输运理论及溶腔形态变化规律研究[D];中国科学院研究生院(渗流流体力学研究所);2003年
6 班凡生;盐穴储气库水溶建腔优化设计研究[D];中国科学院研究生院(渗流流体力学研究所);2008年
7 陈锋;盐岩力学特性及其在储气库建设中的应用研究[D];中国科学院研究生院(武汉岩土力学研究所);2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 莫江;层状盐岩体储气库建造及运行稳定性研究[D];太原理工大学;2009年
2 李贤良;含硫气藏型储气库注采工艺的研究[D];西安石油大学;2015年
3 韩中阳;互层状盐岩储气库地表沉降机理与数值模拟研究[D];郑州大学;2015年
4 杨金龙;储气库固井水泥浆体系配方研究[D];东北石油大学;2015年
5 肖火林;双6储气库钻采工程设计研究[D];东北石油大学;2015年
6 郭巍;盐穴储气库水溶造腔过程中的腔体稳定性研究[D];武汉轻工大学;2015年
7 刘伟莎;层状盐岩储气库建腔期安全综合评价及多因素优化研究[D];重庆大学;2015年
8 王新胜;盐岩储气库运营期稳定性研究[D];重庆大学;2009年
9 周道勇;高含水后期油藏及含水构造改建储气库研究[D];西南石油大学;2006年
10 张艺;金坛盐矿老腔改建储气库可行性研究[D];重庆大学;2011年
,本文编号:2212672
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/shiyounenyuanlunwen/2212672.html