饭岛忠夫“疑古”论研究

发布时间：2018-03-22 00:33

  本文选题：饭岛忠夫　切入点：中国天文学史　出处：《自然辩证法研究》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通过对饭岛忠夫(1874-1954)其人其学的梳理和分析,探讨了他以《支那古代史论》为代表作的"疑古"论中的部分合理性及大量错谬之处。在《支那古代史论》中,饭岛从多个视角对中国古代天文学性质进行了重新分析,突出了其本有的星占与政治属性。同时,饭岛对《春秋》、《左传》等儒家经典中天文记录所存在的矛盾与问题进行了发掘和整理,通过对原有思路的逆向运用揭示出记载本身的不自洽,在客观上发展了天文历史年代学。但是,饭岛的治学具有两面性,存在强烈的政治动机。其"疑古"论在前提假设、古籍释读、推理方法三方面存在学理缺陷,因此其"中国古代天文学西来说"是立不住脚的。纵观饭岛的学术生涯,其"疑古"论实质在于改造儒教和追求真理,目标是"加强儒教在日本精神文化中的基础地位"。而今回顾以饭岛忠夫为代表的科技史"疑古"思潮,其主要意义在于改造了日本的尚古思维定式以及学术范式的现代化。
[Abstract]:By combing and analyzing his studies, this paper discusses the rationality and errors in the theory of "doubt of the Ancient", which is represented by **. In ** 's Theory of Ancient History, there are a lot of errors in the theory of the ancient history of **. Fandao reanalyzed the nature of ancient Chinese astronomy from several perspectives, highlighting its original astrological and political attributes. Rice Island excavates and arranges the contradictions and problems existing in the astronomical records in the Confucian classics, such as Spring and Autumn period, Zuo Zhuan, and so on. Through the reverse application of the original ideas, it reveals the inconsistency of the records themselves. Objectively, the chronology of astronomical history has been developed. However, the study of Fan Dao has two sides and has strong political motive. Its theory of "doubt of ancient times" has theoretical defects in three aspects: premise hypothesis, interpretation of ancient books, and reasoning method. Therefore, his theory of "ancient Chinese astronomy" cannot stand still. Throughout his academic career, the essence of his theory of "doubt of ancient times" lies in the transformation of Confucianism and the pursuit of truth. The aim is to "strengthen the basic position of Confucianism in Japanese spiritual culture". The main significance of the review of the trend of thought in the history of science and technology, represented by Takeshi Oshima, lies in the transformation of Japanese ancient thinking patterns and the modernization of academic paradigms.
【作者单位】： 南京信息工程大学科学技术史研究院;
【基金】：江苏省基础研究计划(自然科学基金)项目“京都大学的中国天文学史学派研究”(批准号:BK20170937)
【分类号】：P1-09
，

本文编号：1646287