新城新藏的中国天文学史研究初探——以《东洋天文学史研究》为中心
发布时间：2018-10-20 18:40
【摘要】：对新城新藏(1873-1938)的学术背景和研究进路进行了考察。较为全面地研究了《东洋天文学史研究》中的天文历算工作。梳理出其所涉的三大领域:先秦天文历法问题、中国古代天文学起源问题、天文历史年代学问题。并分析了其主要结论:(1)中国上古天文之真实性不容置疑;(2)一味疑古之说不可尽信;(3)中国天文学西来说不可靠。
[Abstract]:The academic background and research route of Xinzang (1873-1938) were investigated. The astronomical almanac work in the History of Oriental Astronomy is studied in detail. There are three main fields involved in this study: the pre-Qin astronomical calendar, the origin of ancient Chinese astronomy, and the chronology of astronomical history. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the authenticity of ancient Chinese astronomy is indisputable; (2) the theory of skepticism cannot be fully believed; (3) the western part of Chinese astronomy is not reliable.
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学科学史与科学文化研究院;
【分类号】：P1-092
[Abstract]:The academic background and research route of Xinzang (1873-1938) were investigated. The astronomical almanac work in the History of Oriental Astronomy is studied in detail. There are three main fields involved in this study: the pre-Qin astronomical calendar, the origin of ancient Chinese astronomy, and the chronology of astronomical history. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the authenticity of ancient Chinese astronomy is indisputable; (2) the theory of skepticism cannot be fully believed; (3) the western part of Chinese astronomy is not reliable.
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学科学史与科学文化研究院;
【分类号】：P1-092
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 石之瑜;李圭之;曾倚萃;;日本近代中国学:知识可否解放身份[J];中国社会科学;2007年01期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 王夏刚;曹德良;;抗战时期金毓黼东北史研究述论[J];大连近代史研究;2009年00期
2 赵薇;;“尧舜禹抹杀论”与白鸟库吉的日本东洋史学[J];北方论丛;2013年01期
3 胡天舒;;内藤湖南的中国观——以《燕山楚水》为中心[J];历史教学(下半月刊);2013年11期
4 齐s，
本文编号：2284043
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/tianwen/2284043.html
