太初历的纪年问题——太岁纪年法被淘汰的原因
发布时间：2018-11-17 17:54
【摘要】：战国、秦到汉初,古人确曾用过太岁纪年。但东汉以后,太岁纪年为什么被淘汰?太初历所定"百四十四岁而太岁超一辰"是否准确?文章从十干和岁阳的对应、摄提格与假岁星混用等7个方面作了大胆、新颖的论述。
[Abstract]:Warring States, Qin to the beginning of the Han Dynasty, the ancients did use the year. But after the Eastern Han Dynasty, why was Taiyyear eliminated? Is it accurate to say "one hundred forty-four years old and too old over one hour" in the Taichu calendar In this paper, the author makes a bold and novel discussion from seven aspects, such as the correspondence between the ten cadres and the year yang, and the mixed use of the photo Tige and the false year star.
【作者单位】： 内蒙古师范大学科学技术史研究院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“《崇祯历书》中的‘法’与‘数’及其在中国的嬗变”(10863001)
【分类号】：P192
[Abstract]:Warring States, Qin to the beginning of the Han Dynasty, the ancients did use the year. But after the Eastern Han Dynasty, why was Taiyyear eliminated? Is it accurate to say "one hundred forty-four years old and too old over one hour" in the Taichu calendar In this paper, the author makes a bold and novel discussion from seven aspects, such as the correspondence between the ten cadres and the year yang, and the mixed use of the photo Tige and the false year star.
【作者单位】： 内蒙古师范大学科学技术史研究院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“《崇祯历书》中的‘法’与‘数’及其在中国的嬗变”(10863001)
【分类号】：P192
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 汪大白;;戴震《屈原赋注》思想内涵的自我超越——以《离骚》解说为中心[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
2 张二雄;魏耕原;;《离骚》疑义补阙[J];安康学院学报;2012年01期
3 鲍红;《离骚》“求女”喻意五说得失辨[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2001年03期
4 郭春阳;;“女Z，
本文编号：2338622
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/tianwen/2338622.html
