组合导航系统性能评估方法的研究
[Abstract]:With the development of microelectronic technology, navigation technology and control theory, the integrated navigation system, which is small in size, low in cost, low in power consumption, high in function, high in precision and high in reliability, has become a new development trend, and has been widely used in military and aviation. Space, navigation, transportation, etc. The main task of integrated navigation system is to provide accurate and reliable position, speed and attitude information for the vehicle. With the increasing degree of automation, the structure of the system is becoming more and more complex, and the relationship between the equipment in the system is becoming more and more close. The performance of the system is directly related to the safety of the carrier and all personnel. Therefore, it is of great significance to evaluate the performance of the system and lay a foundation for the optimal design of the integrated navigation system. Firstly, taking integrated navigation system as an example, this paper introduces the background and significance of the research, summarizes the development status of navigation system and its evaluation theory, based on reading a large number of related documents. This paper expounds the problems needing attention in the process of system evaluation and several common system evaluation methods, discusses the working principle of the integrated navigation system, analyzes the system performance index, and establishes the performance evaluation index system of the integrated navigation system. The method of determining the index weight is given, and the index weight is determined by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Secondly, aiming at the problems such as poor objectivity of index weight obtained by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and weak degree of judgment grade determined by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the system performance evaluation model is established by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy. In this method, the index weight is modified by entropy weight method, and the weighted average operator is selected for fuzzy operation. According to the index weight, the comprehensive performance of the system is reflected by each index. Interval quantization is used to enhance the discriminability of the system in the same judgment level. The simulation results show that the proposed method can evaluate the performance of the system accurately and objectively, and it is compared with the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Then, aiming at the nonlinearity and complexity of the performance evaluation of integrated navigation system, BP neural network has strong adaptability to nonlinear system. The comprehensive evaluation method based on BP neural network is used to establish the system performance evaluation model. The network model structure of the integrated navigation system is determined and the dimensionless sample data is processed. The simulation results show that the method is simple and easy to operate and overcomes the fuzziness and uncertainty in the evaluation process. Compared with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy, it is proved that the model is reasonable and reliable. Finally, aiming at the limitation of BP neural network evaluation method, such as large sample and large amount of calculation, the comprehensive evaluation method based on grey theory is used, and the grey correlation degree method, gray whitening weight method and fuzzy mathematics method are established, respectively. The evaluation model of grey clustering method is proved to be correct and reasonable by simulation experiments, and the advantages and disadvantages of integrated navigation system can be judged accurately. The grey cluster comprehensive evaluation method solves the problem that the grey relational degree comprehensive evaluation method can not determine the system evaluation grade, and makes up for the shortcomings of the grey and white weight and fuzzy mathematics comprehensive evaluation method, such as the objectivity of the evaluation method and the degree of discrimination can not be strong, and so on. The objectivity and effectiveness of integrated navigation system performance evaluation are improved.
【学位授予单位】:哈尔滨工程大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:TN967.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 白亮;;基于熵权模糊综合评判法的情报融合性能评估[J];舰船电子工程;2013年04期
2 张乐;李武周;巨养锋;张红林;;基于圆概率误差的定位精度评定办法[J];指挥控制与仿真;2013年01期
3 王有成;敖志刚;胡波;张康益;唐长春;;基于BP网络的武器装备运用合理性评估[J];计算机与数字工程;2013年01期
4 石德方;余选召;张晓东;;基于BP神经网络的用频效能评估研究[J];科技信息;2013年02期
5 赵欣;王跃钢;王仕成;张金生;杨述华;;一种组合导航信息融合算法品质评估方法[J];中国惯性技术学报;2012年02期
6 雷鸣;楚威;李阳;;基于BP神经网络的系统综合效能评估方法[J];指挥信息系统与技术;2012年01期
7 吴笛;;基于BP神经网络的航天发射平台性能评估研究[J];机床与液压;2011年17期
8 孙淑光;;多传感器组合导航系统性能评估[J];计算机工程;2011年03期
9 李元锋;李正生;王洋;;基于模糊综合评判的多指标匹配算法性能评估[J];光电工程;2010年08期
10 陈希祥;邱静;刘冠军;;基于层次分析法与模糊综合评判的测试设备选择方法研究[J];兵工学报;2010年01期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 卢鸿谦;SINS/GPS组合导航性能增强技术研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2006年
2 周卫东;组合导航系统应用软件可靠性研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2006年
3 钱华明;故障诊断与容错技术及其在组合导航系统中的应用研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 付强;车载组合导航系统鲁棒H_∞滤波[D];沈阳工业大学;2011年
2 王冲;组合导航系统故障诊断方法集成与系统设计[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2011年
3 于国龙;嵌入式操作系统的实时性分析与研究[D];兰州理工大学;2010年
4 冯远远;IRS/GNSS导航综合性能评估技术[D];南京航空航天大学;2010年
5 杨俊峰;灰色系统理论在软件可信性评估中的应用研究[D];贵州大学;2009年
6 费智聪;熵权—层次分析法与灰色—层次分析法研究[D];天津大学;2009年
7 王哲;组合导航系统性能测试平台的改进研发[D];上海交通大学;2008年
8 倪静静;INS/GPS组合导航系统性能评估平台的开发[D];上海交通大学;2007年
9 杨睿;多传感器融合导航系统的数据处理及性能分析[D];南京航空航天大学;2007年
10 边德飞;多传感器融合导航系统性能评估算法研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2007年
,本文编号:2396934
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/wltx/2396934.html