当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 临床医学论文 >

冰冻单采血小板与新鲜单采血小板临床应用效果评价

发布时间:2018-02-04 16:03

  本文关键词: 冰冻单采血小板 新鲜单采血小板 临床应用疗效 CCI 出处:《中国输血杂志》2017年07期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:目的通过冰冻单采血小板与新鲜单采血小板临床疗效与安全性的回顾性病例对照分析,探讨冰冻单采血小板的临床应用价值。方法利用医院临床用血全程闭环智能路径管理与评价信息系统检索2014年8月-2016年12月血小板输注病例资料2 035例,并筛选出456例纳入临床病例对照研究;根据输注血小板种类分为冰冻单采血小板组(A组,n=199)和新鲜单采血小板组(B组,n=257)。通过对比分析两组病例基本资料、有效性指标及安全性指标,评价冰冻单采血小板的临床应用价值。结果 1)A、B两组病例分别占43.6%(199/456)、56.4%(257/456);A、B组间性别、年龄和内科、外科病例构成比差异均不具统计学意义(P0.05);2)199例A组病例共输注冰冻单采血小板2 275U,其中121例内科病例输注量占60.9%(1 385/2 275),78例外科病例输注量占39.1%8(890/2275);疾病分布中血液系统疾病输注量占49.2%(1 120/2 275),妇产科疾病输注量占10.6%(240/2 275),肿瘤放化疗疾病输注量占6.2%(140/2 275);ABO血型分布构成比分别为O型25.9%、A型22.9%、B型20.7%、AB型30.5%;3)A、B两组病例输血前、后Plt计数差异均具统计学意义(P0.05);而两组间输血前和输后24 h Plt计数、差值、24 h CCI差异均不具统计学意义(P0.05);4)A、B两组血小板输注有效率分别为76.9%、76.7%,组间差异不具统计学意义(P0.05);两组间内科及外科病例疗效差异均不具统计学意义(P0.05),但A组外科病例有效率(84.6%)高于B组外科病例(75.3%);B组内科与外科病例间疗效差异不具统计学意义(P0.05),但A组内科与外科病例间疗效差异具统计学意义(P0.05),外科病例血小板输注无效率(15.4%)明显低于内科病例(28.1%);5)A、B两组输血不良反应发生率分别为3.5%、4.7%,输血死亡率均为0,组间差异不具统计学意义(P0.05)。结论冰冻单采血小板在临床治疗中与新鲜单采血小板具有同等的有效性和安全性,可广泛用于临床,特别是在外科止血疗效上具有一定的优势,但对反复输注或血小板输注无效病例应优先使用新鲜单采血小板。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of frozen platelets and fresh platelets. To explore the clinical application value of cryopreserved platelets. Methods the clinical data of platelet transfusion cases from August 2014 to December 2016 were retrieved by the hospital clinical blood closed-loop intelligent path management and evaluation information system. Material 2. 035 cases. 456 cases were selected for clinical case-control study. According to the type of transfusion platelets were divided into two groups: group A (group A) and group B (group B). The basic data of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Efficacy and safety indexes were used to evaluate the clinical value of cryopreserved platelets. Results (1) there were 43.6 cases in group A and 45.6 cases in group B (199-456). 56.4A 257R / 456C; There was no significant difference in sex, age, internal medicine, and the ratio of surgical cases between group A and B (P 0.05). 2Three patients in group A received 2275U for transfusion of frozen platelets, of which 121cases of internal medicine accounted for 60.9g / 1 385/2 275U). 78 cases in department accounted for 39.1% 890% 2275%; In the distribution of diseases, the volume of transfusion of diseases of blood system was 49.2% and that of gynecology and obstetrics was 10.6 / 220 / 2275). The infusion volume of tumor radiation and chemotherapy diseases was 6.2 / 140 / 2275U; The composition ratio of ABO blood group was O 25.9B = 22.9A and 20.7B respectively. 3There were significant differences in Plt count between the two groups before and after blood transfusion (P 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the Plt count and the difference of 24 h CCI between the two groups before and after transfusion (P 0.05). (4) the effective rate of platelet transfusion in the two groups was 76. 9% and 76. 7%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0. 05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the curative effect of internal medicine and surgery, but the effective rate of surgical cases in group A was 84.6) higher than that in group B. There was no significant difference in curative effect between internal medicine and surgery in group B, but there was significant difference in curative effect between internal medicine and surgery in group A (P 0.05). The inefficiency of platelets transfusion in surgical patients was 15.4%, which was significantly lower than that in internal medicine cases (28.1D). The incidence of adverse reaction of blood transfusion in group A and B was 3. 5% and 4. 7, respectively. The mortality rate of blood transfusion was 0. Conclusion cryopreserved platelets have the same efficacy and safety as fresh platelets in clinical treatment and can be widely used in clinical practice. Especially in the surgical hemostatic curative effect has certain superiority, but for the repeated transfusion or the platelet transfusion invalid case should be given priority to use the fresh single platelet.
【作者单位】: 江西省南昌大学第一附属医院输血科;
【基金】:江西省科技厅支撑计划(20151BBG70216) 江西省科技重大项目(20144BBG70001)
【分类号】:R457.1
【正文快照】: 血小板(platelet,Plt)输注可有效预防和治疗患者因血小板减少或功能异常而导致的出血症状,从而降低出血所致的死亡,在临床输血治疗中具有不可替代的作用[1-2]。近年来,由于临床上血小板需求量的不断增加,血小板供求矛盾日显突出,因新鲜单采血小板有效期仅5d而致使血小板供应库

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘广彩,白景丽,谷彦霞;单采血小板去除术的护理体会[J];临床输血与检验;2002年04期

2 徐学新,韩海心,王青改,张海娟,梁军;单采血小板与手工血小板输注临床疗效比较[J];职业与健康;2003年02期

3 黄飞;单采血小板保存7天:体外研究报道[J];国外医学.输血及血液学分册;2003年02期

4 申春梅;刘洪艳;祝玉美;;关于单采血小板的问题与对策[J];中国社区医师(综合版);2007年19期

5 吕毅;郝宝岚;王艳;林常青;邵树军;周丽莉;王书锋;;手工分离血小板与单采血小板质量及输注疗效的对比研究[J];中国输血杂志;2008年09期

6 郝宝岚;吕毅;邵树军;董晓峰;任磊;;单采血小板与手工分离血小板的质量比较[J];河南医学研究;2010年02期

7 李伟其;;单采血小板和混合浓缩血小板的比较[J];中外医学研究;2013年27期

8 陈琳;鞠春芳;张在臻;;单采血小板保存期内部分参数检测的意义[J];中国医药导刊;2013年S1期

9 李雅静;张燕;常缨;戚海;张颖萍;;石家庄市6171名单采血小板献血者分布特征的调查分析[J];中国输血杂志;2014年02期

10 刘金星;2例单采血小板失败原因分析[J];临床输血与检验;2000年04期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 林宏;孙东明;兰学晶;;单采血小板2个治疗量仪器选择分析[A];中国输血协会第五届输血大会论文专集(摘要篇)[C];2010年

2 常在娟;徐力东;;单采血小板保存过程中质量评价的研究[A];中国输血协会第五届输血大会论文专集(摘要篇)[C];2010年

3 张国清;杨玉发;饶美琼;;心理护理对单采血小板献血者的影响[A];中国输血协会第四届输血大会论文集[C];2006年

4 张献清;穆士杰;孙文利;夏爱军;;保存前去白细胞单采血小板的临床应用[A];中国输血协会第三届输血大会论文专辑[C];2004年

5 赖风雷;陈火玲;杨南;王丽;;单采血小板采前后血小板功能评价的必要性[A];中国输血协会第三届输血大会论文专辑[C];2004年

6 徐朝霞;谭虹;黄可;;多次采血后献血者血小板变化的观察[A];中国输血协会第四届输血大会论文集[C];2006年

7 金燕萍;朱敏华;郭炳申;;单采血小板在外科手术中的应用[A];中国输血协会第三届输血大会论文专辑[C];2004年

8 丛培芳;张永征;李颖;张燕华;;单采血小板安全采集量研究[A];中国输血协会第四届输血大会论文集[C];2006年

9 殷国美;沈卓岚;徐健;;规律的无偿单采血小板献血者血液学指标变化初探[A];中国输血协会第四届输血大会论文集[C];2006年

10 林俊杰;徐忠;邱颖婕;张晰;孔祥荣;万霞;薛景霞;周晓嫣;钱开诚;;单采血小板细菌筛检24h锁定的初步探讨[A];中国输血协会第四届输血大会论文集[C];2006年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 欧阳锡林;薄片法血小板快速凝集实验的建立及应用研究[D];中国人民解放军军医进修学院;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 邹艳艳;乌鲁木齐市血液中心临床血小板用量动态平衡模型的建立[D];新疆医科大学;2009年



本文编号:1490587

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/linchuangyixuelunwen/1490587.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户17d8e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com