当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 临床医学论文 >

聚焦解决模式对PCI术后患者负性情绪及疾病不确定感的影响

发布时间:2018-02-04 23:38

  本文关键词: PCI术后 聚焦解决模式 负性情绪 疾病不确定感 出处:《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:目的运用聚焦解决模式对冠心病PCI术后患者进行临床干预,从患者自身优势及资源出发,调动患者的积极主动性,降低患者的负性情绪及疾病不确定感,患者的负性情绪包括焦虑情绪和抑郁情绪,进而改变患者行为活动。方法选取自2015年12月-2016年6月,于青岛某三甲医院心血管内科,收集PCI成功术后患者110例,自愿参加临床干预研究并签署知情同意书;采用随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和干预组各55人,随访过程中,有2人自动退出,4人失访,最终对照组和干预组各52人;对照组和干预组在干预前均填写焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、Mishel疾病不确定感量表(MUIS)以及一般资料量表;对照组患者术后接受常规健康宣教,干预组在接受常规健康宣教的基础上予以聚焦解决模式进行临床干预实验;两组患者出院当天均填写MUIS量表;出院后1个月内每周电话随访一次并进行院外持续干预,来院复查填写SAS、SDS;出院后3个月内每2周电话随访1次并进行院外持续干预,回院复查患者再次填写SAS、SDS、服药依从性量表,及收集患者各项血脂指标和院外吸烟、饮酒、锻炼情况。结果1.冠心病PCI术后患者在年龄、性别、文化程度等一般资料,焦虑评分、抑郁评分、疾病不确定感评分等基线资料均无统计学意义(P0.05);2.冠心病PCI术后患者接受临床聚焦解决模式干预后,出院当天对照组和干预组患者疾病不确定感总分及其各维度比较差异有统计学意义(P0.01);且与术后当天患者疾病不确定感比较,两组患者均有统计学差异(P0.01);3.随访1个月、3个月后冠心病PCI术后患者,对照组和干预组焦虑、抑郁评分差异均有统计学意义(P0.01);4.随访3个月后复查各项危血脂指标,对照组和干预组差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。5.患者出院3个月来院复查,对照组和干预组患者的服药依从性以及吸烟饮酒锻炼情况比较,结果只有两组患者的吸烟情况统计学无差异(P0.05),服药依从性、饮酒、锻炼情况比较结果(P0.01)。结论聚焦解决模式临床护理干预有效的降低患者术后焦虑、抑郁情绪及疾病不确定感;聚焦解决模式可以提高患者的院外依从性,还通过缓解患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪调节患者的血脂指标。
[Abstract]:Objective to use the focus solution model to intervene the patients with coronary heart disease (PCI) after operation, and to mobilize the positive and initiative of the patients from their own advantages and resources, so as to reduce the negative emotion and the sense of uncertainty of the patients. The negative emotion of the patients included anxiety and depression, and then changed the behavior of the patients. Methods from December 2015 to June 2016, the patients were selected in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of a third Class A Hospital in Qingdao. 110 successful PCI patients were enrolled in the clinical intervention study and signed informed consent. The patients were divided into control group and intervention group by random number table method. During the follow-up, 2 patients quit the interview automatically, and 52 patients in the control group and the intervention group. Before intervention, the control group and the intervention group all completed SAS, SDS / Mishel disease uncertainty scale (MUISS) and general information scale. The patients in the control group received routine health education after operation, and the intervention group underwent clinical intervention experiment on the basis of routine health education. The patients in both groups completed MUIS scale on the day of discharge. One month after discharge, the patients were followed up by telephone once a week and continued to intervene outside the hospital. Every 2 weeks after discharge, the patients were followed up by telephone every 2 weeks and continued to intervene outside the hospital. The patients who returned to the hospital filled in the SAS SDS again, took the compliance scale, and collected the blood lipid index and smoking outside the hospital. Results 1. Patients with coronary heart disease after PCI in age, sex, education and other general information, anxiety score, depression score. 2. No statistical significance was found in baseline data such as disease uncertainty score (P0.05). 2.After the intervention of clinical focus mode after coronary heart disease (PCI) operation, there were significant differences in the total score of disease uncertainty and its dimensions between the control group and the intervention group on the day of discharge (P 0.01). And compared with the patients after the day of disease uncertainty, the two groups of patients have a statistical difference (P0.01); 3. Follow up for 1 month, after 3 months of coronary heart disease PCI patients, the control group and the intervention group anxiety, depression score differences were statistically significant (P 0.01); 4. After 3 months follow-up, there was no significant difference between the control group and the intervention group. The patients were discharged from hospital for 3 months. Control group and intervention group patients' compliance to take medicine and smoking and drinking exercise, the results showed that there was no statistical difference between the two groups of smoking, P0.05, drug compliance, alcohol consumption. Conclusion the clinical nursing intervention of focus solution model can effectively reduce the anxiety, depression and uncertainty of patients after operation. The focus solution model can improve the patients' compliance outside hospital, and regulate the blood lipid index by relieving the anxiety and depression of the patients.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R473.5

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王月华;樊玉花;董彩梅;;颅脑损伤患者家属疾病不确定感及其影响因素研究[J];护理管理杂志;2016年10期

2 周荣;李红军;王振卿;;聚焦解决模式在慢性乙型肝炎患者随访管理中的应用效果[J];护理管理杂志;2016年03期

3 吴丽娟;黄海香;骆建梅;招伟英;邵亚;黄敏;廖少玲;;住院早产儿母亲疾病不确定感与育儿自我效能的相关性研究[J];中华现代护理杂志;2016年07期

4 范瑜;鲜玉霞;李娜;;积极心理学理论指导下的护理干预用于精神分裂症患者的价值[J];海南医学;2016年02期

5 宁艳娇;万紫旭;侯福军;王妍;;冠心病患者疾病不确定感现状的研究进展[J];护士进修杂志;2015年24期

6 吕扬;李峥;韩美英;程艮;安凤荣;;门诊老年抑郁症患者服药依从性的影响因素分析[J];中华护理杂志;2015年10期

7 文莎丽;卢彦芳;金自卫;张静平;;基于积极心理学的动机性访谈对提高直肠癌结肠造口患者自尊的作用[J];解放军护理杂志;2015年16期

8 陈伟伟;高润霖;刘力生;朱曼璐;王文;王拥军;吴兆苏;李惠君;郑哲;蒋立新;胡盛寿;;《中国心血管病报告2014》概要[J];中国循环杂志;2015年07期

9 庄o劢,

本文编号:1491482


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/linchuangyixuelunwen/1491482.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户956db***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com