重度烧伤患者家庭亲密度和适应性与社交回避和苦恼的相关性

发布时间：2018-03-26 21:31

本文选题：烧伤　切入点：家庭亲密度和适应性　出处：《中国康复理论与实践》2017年06期

【摘要】：目的调查重度烧伤患者家庭亲密度和适应性、社交回避和苦恼的现状,探讨二者的相关性,为制定干预措施提供依据。方法 2013年1月至2015年6月,对出院后来门诊复查的289例重度烧伤患者进行现场问卷调查,包括自行设计的一般情况调查表、中文版家庭亲密度和适应性量表(FACESⅡ)、社交回避及苦恼量表(SADS),进行Pearson相关分析。结果重度烧伤患者家庭实际亲密度、实际适应性均明显低于国内常模(t3.830,P0.01),理想亲密度、亲密度不满意程度、理想适应性、适应性不满意程度均明显高于国内常模(t3.857,P0.01);SADS得分明显高于常模。重度烧伤患者家庭实际亲密度、实际适应性、FACESⅡ总分与SADS各项评分均呈负相关(P0.05),家庭亲密度不满意程度、适应性不满意程度与SADS评分均呈正相关(P0.05)。结论重度烧伤患者存在较为严重的社交回避和苦恼,可能受家庭亲密度和适应性下降影响。应采取有针对性的护理措施。
[Abstract]:Investigation of severe burn patients in family cohesion and adaptability to the status quo of social avoidance and distress, the relationship between the two, to provide evidence for the intervention measures. Methods from January 2013 to June 2015, a questionnaire survey was conducted on the hospital later patient review of 289 cases of severe burn patients, including self-designed general situation questionnaire, Chinese version of family intimacy degree and Adaptability Scale (FACES II), social avoidance and distress scale (SADS), Pearson correlation analysis was conducted. Results the patients with severe burns family intimacy, adaptability were significantly lower than the national norm (t3.830, P0.01), ideal intimacy, intimacy satisfaction, ideal adaptability, adaptability the degree of satisfaction was significantly higher than the national norm (t3.857, P0.01); the SADS score was significantly higher than the norm. In severe burn patients family intimacy, actual adaptability, FACES II score and SADS The scores were negatively correlated (P0.05), family cohesion is not satisfied with the degree of adaptability, dissatisfaction and SADS score were positively correlated (P0.05). Conclusion the patients with severe burn there is severe social avoidance and distress, may be affected by the decline of family cohesion and adaptability. It is necessary to take corresponding nursing measures.

【作者单位】：陕西省宝鸡市中心医院整形烧伤科;
【分类号】：R473.6

【参考文献】