血液分析仪检测中末梢血常规与静脉血常规结果的对比

发布时间：2018-04-30 04:34

本文选题：血液分析仪 + 末梢血　；参考：《临床医药文献电子杂志》2017年06期

【摘要】：目的对血液分析仪检测中末梢血常规与静脉血常规的结果对比分析,探讨血常规检验检测最适合的采血方式。方法选取2015年1~2016年1月我院健康体检者120例作为研究对象,同一体检者同时采取末梢血与静脉血。末梢血标本为A组,静脉血标本为B组,对比分析两组差异性。结果静脉血与末梢血检测项目中:RBC、Hb、PLT及MCHC末梢血组检测结果明显低于静脉血组,且具有统计学意义(P0.05);WBC、MCV明显高于静脉血组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);其它项目检测结果比较无明显差异,无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论静脉血常规是血液分析仪的最优选择。其快速、高效、稳定且重复率较好,特别符合临床寻求准确且快速检测项目的需求。为减少检测误差,可广泛应用临床。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare and analyze the results of peripheral blood routine and venous blood routine in blood analyzer, and to explore the most suitable method for blood collection. Methods one hundred and twenty healthy persons in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were selected as the study subjects. Both peripheral blood and venous blood were used in the same physical examination. The peripheral blood samples were group A and the venous blood samples were group B. The difference between the two groups was analyzed. Results in the venous and peripheral blood test items, the results of MCHC and MCHC peripheral blood were significantly lower than those of venous blood group, and the results were significantly higher than that of venous blood group (P 0.05), the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference in other items. There was no statistical significance (P 0.05). Conclusion Venous blood routine is the best choice for blood analyzer. It is fast, efficient, stable and reproducible, especially in line with clinical requirements for accurate and rapid detection. In order to reduce the detection error, it can be widely used in clinic.
【作者单位】：郑州大学附属南阳医院/南阳市中心医院检验科;
【分类号】：R446.11

【参考文献】