脉压指数与维持性血液透析患者左心结构及功能的相关性研究
本文选题:维持性血液透析 + 脉压指数 ; 参考:《青海大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:探讨维持性血液透析(MHD)患者脉压指数(PPI)与左心结构及功能的相关性并进一步分析左心结构及功能的影响因素。方法:随机收取于2007年1月-2016年2月在青海大学附属医院的肾病内科血液透析中心规律行低通量血液透析治疗的相对完整的患者病历资料共76份,记录患者的人口学资料、生化指标、透析龄(DA)及左心结构及功能指标,记录1个月内所有患者的透析前SBP、DBP、超滤量(UF)、透析间期体重增长百分比(IDWG),计算脉压(PP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉压指数(PPI)。采用SPSS 17.0进行统计学分析,探讨脉压指数与左心结构及功能的相关性并进一步分析左心结构及功能改变的影响因素,检验水准为α=0.05。结果:1.LVH组的SBP、PP、PPI、IDWG较非LVH组高,而HGB、TG较非LVH组低,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组间的Age、DA、UF、TP、ALB、GLB、AST、LDH、HBDH、CK、CKMB、MYO、BUN、UA、TCH、LDL、HDL、Ca、P、i PTH、DBP、MAP差异无显著性(P0.05)。2.PP与LA、IVS、LVMI呈显著正相关,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),相关系数从大到小依次为LVMI(0.441)、LA(0.342)、IVS(0.260)。而与LVd、LVPW及左心功能无相关性,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);PPI与LVMI、LA正相关,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),相关系数从大到小分别为LVMI(0.339)、LA(0.276)。与LVd、LVPW、IVS及左心功能无相关性,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。3.SBP是LVd、IVS、LVPW、LVMI、EDV、SV、CO等左心结构及功能改变的最重要影响因素;HGB是LVMI及CI的重要影响因素;IDWG是LVPW的重要影响因素;PP是LA改变的重要影响因素;PPI虽与LA及LVMI存在正相关,但PPI可能不是导致左心结构及功能改变的影响因素,其与MHD患者心血管事件的相关性主要基于SBP、HGB的变化。结论:1.维持性血液透析患者左室肥厚常见,且左室肥厚者脉压指数高于非左室肥厚者。2.脉压指数与LA、LVMI正相关,可能不是导致左心结构及功能改变的主要影响因素,收缩压是左心结构及功能改变最重要的影响因素。3.控制血压尤其是SBP、减少脉压差、控制透析间期体重增长、改善贫血可能改善MHD患者左心重构及心功能。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the correlation between pulse pressure index (PPI) and left ventricular structure and function in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and to analyze the influencing factors of left ventricular structure and function. Methods: a total of 76 patient records were collected randomly from January 2007 to February 2016 in the Nephrology Hemodialysis Center of Qinghai University affiliated Hospital for low-flux hemodialysis. The demographic data of the patients were recorded. Biochemical parameters, age of dialysis (DAA) and left ventricular structure and function were recorded in all patients before dialysis. SBP, UF, IDWGG, average arterial pressure (map), pulse pressure index (PPI) and pulse pressure index (PPI) were recorded in all patients within one month. SPSS 17.0 was used to analyze the correlation between pulse pressure index and left ventricular structure and function, and the influencing factors of left ventricular structure and function were further analyzed. The test level was 伪 0.05. Results 1. In LVH group, the level of LVH / PPIP LVH IDWG was higher than that of non-LVH group, while the level of TG was lower than that of non-LVH group, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). There was no significant positive correlation between the two groups (P 0.05.2.PP and LAIVSL LVMI, P 0.05.2.The difference was statistically significant, and the correlation coefficient from large to small was 0.441L 0.342VS0.260.) there was no significant positive correlation between the two groups (P 0.05.2.The difference was statistically significant) between the two groups, and the correlation coefficient from big to small was: MI0.441L0.342IVS0.2600.The difference between the two groups was not significant (P0.05.2.The difference between PP and LAIVSLVMI was statistically significant, and the correlation coefficient from big to small was as follows: MI0.441L0.342VS0.260nil.) the difference between the two groups was not significant (P 0.05.2.PP and LAIVSL LVMI) were significantly higher than those in the control group. There was no significant correlation between LVPW and LVPW and left ventricular function, but there was no significant difference between P0.05PPI and LVMILA. There was no correlation between LVD and LVPWV IVS and left ventricular function. There was no significant difference between them (P 0.05). 3. SBP was the most important factor influencing the structure and function of left heart, such as LVDIVS, LVMI, EDV, LVMI, etc. HGBwas an important factor of LVMI and CI. LVPW was an important influencing factor. PP was an important influencing factor of LA, although there was a positive correlation between PPI and LA and LVMI. However, PPI may not be the influencing factor for the changes of left ventricular structure and function, and its correlation with cardiovascular events in patients with MHD is mainly based on the changes of SBP / HGB. Conclusion 1. Left ventricular hypertrophy is common in maintenance hemodialysis patients, and the pulse pressure index in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy is higher than that in non-left ventricular hypertrophy patients. Pulse pressure index was positively correlated with LVMI, which may not be the main influencing factor for the change of left ventricular structure and function, and systolic pressure was the most important factor for the change of left ventricular structure and function. Control of blood pressure, especially SBP, reduction of pulse pressure difference, control of weight gain during dialysis period, improvement of anemia may improve left ventricular remodeling and cardiac function in patients with MHD.
【学位授予单位】:青海大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R459.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴一福;;手发抖 查查脉压指数[J];开心老年;2010年12期
2 王静,苑杰,胡万宁,于文霞;3850名老年人脉压指数水平分析[J];中国老年学杂志;2005年01期
3 苑杰,曾强,王静,胡万宁,于文霞;老年人脉压和脉压指数水平及相关危险因素研究[J];中华老年心脑血管病杂志;2005年02期
4 莫云秋;卫智权;方显明;;脉压和脉压指数与心血管疾病的危险性[J];中国医学文摘(内科学);2006年05期
5 凌丹芸;曹国良;王传慧;乔红梅;施惠华;韩江;冯月英;戴蓉芳;;脉压指数对老年高血压合并糖尿病患者早期肾损伤预测价值[J];中华实用诊断与治疗杂志;2010年10期
6 王静;苑杰;;老年人脉压指数及相关危险因素研究[J];现代生物医学进展;2010年22期
7 叶建华;时会娟;庞晓黎;;血脂异常与脉压指数的相关性研究[J];宁夏医学杂志;2011年02期
8 何亚丽;蔡水华;;脉压和脉压指数在临床应用中的对比分析[J];山西医药杂志(下半月刊);2011年07期
9 李琛;谢江柳;张红霞;罗晓静;;脉压和脉压指数与血压关系的研究[J];中国现代药物应用;2011年14期
10 吴凯;高音;陈晓平;李龙兴;万里艳;陈小妮;;成都地区中老年居民脉压及脉压指数分析[J];现代预防医学;2011年18期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 郑育;金领微;;血液透析患者脑卒中与脉压及脉压指数关系的初步探讨[A];2007年浙沪两地肾脏病学术年会资料汇编[C];2007年
2 徐定修;陈鹏;杨鹏麟;官学强;唐疾飞;李继武;李嘉;;脉压指数与脉搏波速度的相关性研究[A];2004年浙江省心血管病学学术年会论文汇编[C];2004年
3 郑育;金领微;;血液透析患者脑卒中与脉压及脉压指数关系的初步探讨[A];中华医学会第11届全国内科学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
4 赵咏桔;赵雅洁;林云;沈琳辉;王巍;;脉压及指数与估算肾小球滤过率在高血压患者中应用的探讨[A];中华医学会第八次全国老年医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
5 罗昭林;钟杭美;刘春燕;祝善俊;王永;周银;;老年冠心病伴与不伴心肌缺血患者动态血压脉压与脉压指数改变的临床意义[A];第十三次全国心血管病学术会议论文集[C];2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 欧健;脉压指数与维持性血液透析患者左心结构及功能的相关性研究[D];青海大学;2016年
2 田松柏;脉压、脉压指数与妊娠期高血压疾病相关性初探[D];石河子大学;2013年
3 高志广;降压治疗对脉压的影响及其与脑卒中的关系[D];中国医科大学;2008年
4 熊英;高频超声技术对不同脉压的原发性高血压患者外周动脉结构及功能评价研究[D];中南大学;2009年
5 李永梅;原发性高血压患者脉压、脉压指数与左心室肥厚关系的探讨[D];重庆医科大学;2007年
6 蒋海森;老年原发性高血压患者踝肱指数、脉压指数与认知功能的关系[D];承德医学院;2012年
7 沈宇;脉压及脉压指数与冠状动脉病变严重程度的相关性研究[D];天津医科大学;2006年
8 朱建发;高血压患者动态脉压脉压指数与颈动脉亚临床损害关系的探讨[D];山西医科大学;2009年
9 魏长民;主动脉脉压及脉压指数与冠脉病变程度的相关性分析[D];大连医科大学;2014年
10 朱烨静;原发性高血压常见证型与脉压指数及左心重量指数的相关性研究[D];黑龙江中医药大学;2009年
,本文编号:1833920
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/linchuangyixuelunwen/1833920.html