MRI长时间延迟多期增强扫描在肝脏孤立性坏死结节诊断和鉴别诊断中的应用价值
本文选题:肝脏孤立性坏死结节 + 肝细胞癌 ; 参考:《山东大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:研究背景肝脏孤立性坏死结节(solitary necrotic nodule of the liver,SNNL)是一种罕见的良性肿瘤样病变。肝脏孤立性坏死结节的病因尚不清楚,可能与创伤、寄生虫感染、肝血管瘤、肿瘤所引起的变态反应和缺血等因素有关。肝脏孤立性坏死结节具有明显的良性生物学行为,病灶大小可长期无明显改变或自发性减小甚至完全消失,且目前没有肝脏孤立性坏死结节发生恶性转化和引起严重并发症的报道,故临床上其治疗以对症治疗为主,因而明确诊断可避免不必要的手术。肝脏孤立性坏死结节患者的临床表现和体征并无特异性,临床上亦无特殊的实验室检查指标可辅助其诊断。影像学检查中MRI被认为是最具诊断价值的检查手段,然而肝脏孤立性坏死结节在MRI上的特征性影像学表现存在争议,有学者认为肝脏孤立性坏死结节在增强MRI上的特征性表现为肝动脉期、门静脉期和延迟期上均无强化,而亦有学者认为病灶边缘在延迟期出现环形强化而病灶中心三期均无强化是病灶的特征性表现。这些相互矛盾的结论以及非特异性的临床资料导致目前基于患者的临床表现、病史、影像学表现和实验室检查肝脏孤立性坏死结节的术前疑诊率仅约7.8%。虽然特征性影像学表现尚存争议,但肝脏孤立性坏死结节的病理表现具有特征性,即病灶中心完全性、凝固性坏死,病灶周围有薄层纤维包膜包绕,包膜内有浆细胞、单核细胞和淋巴细胞等慢性炎症细胞浸润。鉴于纤维组织和延迟强化的密切关系,且常规增强MRI上延迟强化时间不超过5分钟,因此我们推断肝脏孤立性坏死结节边缘无环形强化的原因是因为相对短的延迟时间。故我们用延迟时间达2小时的长延迟增强MRI扫描以获得肝脏孤立性坏死结节的特异性影像学表现,提高肝脏孤立性坏死结节的诊断率。研究目的通过应用MRI长时间延迟多期增强扫描获得肝脏孤立性坏死结节的特征性影像学表现并将这些影像学表现与肝内三种主要相似恶性疾病的影像学表现进行对比,以探究MRI长时间延迟多期增强扫描在肝脏孤立性坏死结节的诊断和鉴别诊断中的应用价值。研究方法对16例临床疑诊为肝脏孤立性坏死结节、后被病理证实的患者进行平扫及三期增强CT扫描以及平扫和动态对比增强MRI成像,MRI的延迟时间分别为对比剂(Gd-DTPA)注射后3分钟、5分钟、10分钟、15分钟、30分钟、1小时和2小时。同时,将23例具有肝内相似恶性病灶的患者设定为对照组,包括7例肝细胞癌患者(8个病灶)、5例肝内胆管细胞癌患者(5个病灶)和11例肝转移癌患者,利用同样的MRI技术进行扫描,但当观察到病灶边缘强化退出后,后续的延迟扫描便不再进行。在CT和MRI上病灶的影像学观测指标包括:病灶的数目、位置、形状、大小、密度、信号强度、增强程度、边缘强化出现时间和消失时间等,图像的分析和评估由两位具有十年以上经验的放射科医师在不知研究内容的情况下进行评估并记录。本研究获得医院伦理委员会批准并获得所有患者或家属的知情同意。研究结果在16例肝脏孤立性坏死结节患者中,影像学检查共发现16个病灶,当延迟时间≤5分钟时,16个病灶中分别有4个(25%)和8个(50%)病灶在常规CT和MRI延迟期上表现为边缘轻度环形强化。随着增强MRI的延迟时间被延长,肿瘤边缘/瘤内间隔的强化逐渐增厚、强化程度逐渐增加。当延迟时间达到1小时时,所有病灶(100%)均表现为中度至明显边缘环形强化伴中心无强化低信号区。在对照组中,当延迟时间≤5分钟时,所有肝细胞癌、肝内胆管细胞癌及大多数肝转移癌病灶在传统MRI延迟期上表现为中度至明显边缘环形强化。然而,当对比剂注射后10分钟-15分钟时,7个(87.5%)肝细胞癌病灶以及除3个外的所有肝转移癌病灶边缘强化退出,当对比剂注射后30分钟时,1个(20%)肝内胆管细胞癌病灶边缘强化退出,对比剂注射后1小时时,其余4个(80%)肝内胆管细胞癌病灶边缘强化退出。另外,肝内胆管细胞癌和肝转移癌病灶在边缘强化退出时通常伴有对比剂向病灶中心弥散,表现为病灶中心斑片状强化。结论延迟时间为1小时或2小时的长延迟增强MRI在肝脏孤立性坏死结节的诊断及其与肝内相似疾病的鉴别诊断中具有重要意义。肝脏孤立性坏死结节在长延迟增强MRI上的特征性影像学表现为病灶边缘/瘤内间隔明显强化伴中心无强化低信号区,而肝癌、胆管癌和转移瘤则在1小时时边缘的对比剂退出。如果在整个长延迟过程中病灶均未表现出强化,则可以排除肝脏孤立性坏死结节的诊断。
[Abstract]:Background hepatic solitary necrotic nodules (solitary necrotic nodule of the liver, SNNL) is a rare benign tumor like lesion. The etiology of solitary necrotic nodules of the liver is unclear. It may be related to the factors such as trauma, parasitic infection, hepatic hemangioma, allergy and ischemia caused by tumors. Solitary necrotic nodules of the liver. With obvious benign biological behavior, the size of the lesion can not be changed or spontaneously decreased for a long time or even completely disappeared, and there is no report on the malignant transformation of the solitary necrotic nodules of the liver and the report of serious complications. Therefore, the clinical treatment is mainly for symptomatic treatment, so the definite diagnosis can avoid unnecessary operation. There is no specific clinical manifestation and physical signs in patients with solitary necrotic nodules. There is no special laboratory test for diagnosis. MRI is considered as the most diagnostic method in imaging examination. However, the characteristic imaging findings of isolated necrotic nodules in the liver are controversial, and some scholars believe the liver is in the liver. The characteristic manifestations of the solitary necrotic nodules on the enhanced MRI were the hepatic arterial phase, the portal venous phase and the delay period were not enhanced, while some scholars believed that the edge of the lesion had a circular enhancement in the delay period and the three stage of the focus was not enhanced. These contradictory conclusions and non specific clinical data were found. The present rate of diagnosis based on the clinical manifestation, history, imaging and laboratory examination of solitary necrotic nodules of the liver is only about 7.8%., although the characteristic imaging manifestations of the liver are still controversial, but the pathological manifestations of the solitary necrotic nodules of the liver are characteristic, that is, the central integrity of the lesion, the coagulation necrosis, and the thin lesions around the focus. There are chronic inflammatory cells, such as plasma cells, mononuclear cells and lymphocytes in the envelope, in the envelope. In view of the close relationship between the fibrous tissue and the delayed enhancement, and the delayed enhancement time of the conventional enhanced MRI is not more than 5 minutes. Therefore, we infer that the reason for the non ring enhancement on the edge of the solitary liver is because it is relatively short. Delay time. Therefore, we use long delay enhanced MRI scan with delayed time of 2 hours to obtain specific imaging findings of solitary necrotic nodules of the liver, and improve the diagnostic rate of solitary necrotic nodules of the liver. Objective to obtain the characteristic image of hepatic solitary necrotic nodules by MRI long time delayed multiphase enhanced scan. The findings were compared with the imaging findings of the three major similar malignant diseases in the liver to explore the value of MRI long time delayed multiphase enhanced scan in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of solitary necrotic nodules of the liver. 16 cases were clinically suspected as solitary necrotic nodules of the liver, and then pathologically. The confirmed patients underwent plain and three phase enhanced CT scans as well as plain and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI imaging. The delay time of MRI was 3 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hours and 2 hours after the contrast agent (Gd-DTPA). At the same time, 23 patients with intrahepatic similar malignant lesions were set as the control group, including 7 liver fine. Patients with cell carcinoma (8 lesions), 5 cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (5 lesions) and 11 patients with liver metastases were scanned with the same MRI technique, but the follow-up delayed scans were no longer carried out when the lesions were fortified. The number, position, shape, size of the focus on CT and MRI were observed. The analysis and evaluation of the image was evaluated and recorded by two radiologists with more than ten years of experience without knowing the content of the study. This study was approved by the hospital ethics committee and obtained the informed consent of all patients or family members. Results in 16 patients with solitary necrotic nodules of the liver, 16 lesions were found in the imaging examination. When the delay time was less than 5 minutes, 4 (25%) and 8 (50%) of the 16 lesions, respectively, showed marginal annular intensification at the conventional CT and MRI delays. With the prolongation of the intensification of MRI, the tumor margin / intratumoral septum was prolonged. When the delay time was 1 hours, all lesions (100%) showed moderate to obvious marginal annular enhancement with central non intensification low signal region. In the control group, all hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma and most liver metastases were in the traditional MR when the delay time was less than 5 minutes. The I delay period showed moderate to obvious marginal annular enhancement. However, when the contrast agent was injected 10 minutes -15 minutes, 7 (87.5%) hepatocellular carcinoma lesions and all the liver metastases except 3 outside were exited, and 1 (20%) of the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were fortified at the edge of the contrast agent at 30 minutes after the contrast injection, and the contrast agent was injected. At the next 1 hours, the other 4 (80%) intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma lesions were withdrawn. In addition, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatic metastases were usually accompanied by contrast agent diffusion to the center of the lesion, showing central plaque enhancement in the focus. Conclusion the delay time was 1 hours or 2 hours of long delayed enhanced MRI in the liver. The diagnosis of erect necrotic nodules is of great significance in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic similar diseases. The characteristic imaging of hepatic solitary necrotic nodules on long delayed enhanced MRI shows that the marginal / intratumoral septum is obviously enhanced with the central non enhanced low signal region, while the liver, cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic tumors are at the edge of 1 hours. If the lesion does not show enhancement during the whole long delay, the diagnosis of solitary necrotic nodule of the liver can be ruled out.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R575;R445.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董瑞国,孙向东;用弥散张量MRI确定缺血性白质疏松症的特征[J];国外医学(脑血管疾病分册);2000年01期
2 周仪;不全流产型输卵管妊娠MRI诊断1例报告[J];实用放射学杂志;2001年11期
3 史大鹏,李舒茵,窦社伟,张健;痛性眼肌麻痹综合征的MRI诊断[J];中华眼科杂志;2001年01期
4 李涛,王集锷;慢性压迫性颈脊髓病的手术疗效与MRI表现分析[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2001年03期
5 李燕,张岩,苗翠莲,范占明,黄连军;MRI诊断两肺多发囊状肺动静脉瘘一例[J];中华放射学杂志;2002年03期
6 骆伟仙;卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的MRI诊断[J];浙江临床医学;2003年04期
7 郭丽艳,栗亚新;橄榄桥脑小脑萎缩5例临床与MRI分析[J];卒中与神经疾病;2003年01期
8 月强,杨志刚,余建群,刘畅;肾上腺骨髓脂肪瘤的MRI表现特征(附2例报告)[J];华西医学;2004年02期
9 沈新平;弥漫性星形细胞瘤的MRI诊断与病理研究[J];中国医学影像技术;2004年S1期
10 任伯绪;卢宏柱;;肾上腺脑白质营养不良的病理和临床与MRI表现分析[J];实用医技杂志;2006年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 沈新平;;弥漫性星形细胞瘤的MRI诊断与病理研究[A];中国医学影像技术学术研讨会论文集(上)[C];2004年
2 何雨洁;汪晶莹;夏黎明;张克文;向旭;刘书田;代慧明;;原发性椎管内肿瘤的MRI诊断价值[A];中华医学会第十三届全国放射学大会论文汇编(下册)[C];2006年
3 白青科;赵振国;李跃华;隋海晶;谢秀海;龚怡;赵晓晖;曲忠森;陆练军;沈健;夏卫英;;多模式MRI指导的超急性期缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗[A];第十一届全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2008年
4 赵振国;白青科;隋海晶;谢秀海;赵晓晖;王连文;陆练军;沈健;;急诊MRI快速评价指导的超急性期缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗[A];中华医学会第16次全国放射学学术大会论文汇编[C];2009年
5 邓忠良;陈富;柯珍勇;程昀;冉金伟;;MRI引导的经皮穿刺椎体成形术初步临床应用[A];第三届中西医结合脊柱及相关疾病学术年会论文集[C];2009年
6 卜文良;苏伟年;蓝威;;MRI对早期诊断脑弥漫性轴索损伤的51例分析[A];2009年浙江省神经外科学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
7 刘波;魏光师;陈树良;吴姗姗;;卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的MRI诊断[A];第十一次全国中西医结合影像学术研讨会暨全国中西医结合影像学研究进展学习班资料汇编[C];2010年
8 李春高;张东友;;小脑发育不良性神经节细胞瘤MRI诊断价值[A];第十一次全国中西医结合影像学术研讨会暨全国中西医结合影像学研究进展学习班资料汇编[C];2010年
9 楼毅;王翔;周海春;赖灿;;MRI在先天性肛门直肠畸形中的诊断价值(附15例)[A];中华医学会第八次全国小儿外科学术会论文集[C];2010年
10 牛军;李欣;叶祖萍;王春祥;陈静;戴春娟;胡博;吴雪青;詹江华;;MRI对先天性肛门直肠畸形的临床诊疗价值[A];中华医学会第八次全国小儿外科学术会论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前9条
1 ;腰椎间盘髓核退变的MRI表现与病理学的相关性研究[N];中国医药报;2003年
2 姜恒;我国医用永磁MRI磁体开发获重大突破[N];中国医药报;2006年
3 王迪;MRI“揪”出更多乳腺癌病例[N];医药经济报;2004年
4 张忠霞;美癌症学会建议:乳腺癌高危女性每年做一次MRI[N];医药经济报;2007年
5 马艳红;北京安贞医院建立国内最大冠心病MRI数据库[N];中国医药报;2007年
6 衣晓峰 李华妍;步行负荷诊断腰椎狭窄与MRI相当[N];中国医药报;2013年
7 秦笃烈;MRI和起搏器可以兼得[N];健康报;2003年
8 记者 闫煈;卫生部加强PET—MRI配置管理[N];健康报;2011年
9 杨文利;千亿MRI市场能否重新洗牌[N];中国高新技术产业导报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 覃亮;对水稳定的两性羧酸金属有机骨架的合成及其疾病相关核酸的检测和MRI造影性能研究[D];南方医科大学;2016年
2 张鹏;MRI高信号与颈脊髓慢性压迫性疾病的基础与临床相关研究[D];河北医科大学;2014年
3 黄琴;MRI引导聚焦超声联合载基因微泡靶向开放血脑屏障促进外源基因体内转染[D];重庆医科大学;2013年
4 沈婕;阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征病人脑组织结构及代谢改变MRI评价[D];天津医科大学;2011年
5 陈杰;MRI血氧水平依赖成像和磁敏感成像与肾癌病理分级的相关性研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
6 张仁知;3.0T MRI评价与早期预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效研究[D];北京协和医学院;2011年
7 熊斌;滑动多层MRI在直肠癌M分期中的价值[D];华中科技大学;2008年
8 武海澄;MRI磁体系统的计算机辅助设计研究[D];中国科学技术大学;2007年
9 吴琼华;腰椎间盘突出的MRI和病理学评价及相关临床研究[D];浙江大学;2004年
10 冯霞;鼻咽癌放疗后常规MRI显示阴性的脑功能磁共振成像研究[D];南方医科大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 宋颖;MRI计算机辅助诊断系统在乳腺小肿块中的诊断价值[D];北京协和医学院;2015年
2 王明磊;子宫内膜癌MRI动态增强和DWI表现与VEGF-C的相关性分析[D];郑州大学;2014年
3 周佳;多模态MRI在急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓治疗中的应用研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
4 陈菲菲;多模态MRI在直肠癌的应用—高分辨率MR、动态增强扫描及IVIM模型[D];南方医科大学;2015年
5 王庆云;MRI对可逆性后部脑病综合征的诊断价值[D];河北医科大学;2014年
6 梁玲艳;MRI评估喉癌及下咽癌术前分期的价值[D];广西医科大学;2015年
7 肖雅楠;MRI在聚焦超声消融子宫肌瘤疗效评价中的价值[D];新疆医科大学;2015年
8 胡昊;3T-MRI眼眶结构定量测量在Graves眼病诊断及分期中的价值[D];南京医科大学;2015年
9 黄飞龙;普美显增强MRI在结直肠癌肝转移诊断中的作用[D];重庆医科大学;2015年
10 韩利敏;负载疏水性Fe_3O_4纳米粒子的脂质体制备及作为肿瘤MRI探针[D];东华大学;2016年
,本文编号:1959555
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/linchuangyixuelunwen/1959555.html