慢性病赋能量表的汉化修订及在社区中老年患者中的信效度研究
本文选题:社区 + 赋能 ; 参考:《南方医科大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:研究目的1.引进和翻译慢性病赋能量表,并进行信度、效度评价。2.评估国内社区中老年慢性病患者的赋能水平,并探索赋能与自我效能与心理一致感的相关性。研究方法在取得原作者授权后,采用Brislin翻译模型完成量表汉化,采用便利抽样法收集广州市4个社区共273名老年慢性病患者的资料,运用SPSS19.0软件录入资料、进行量表信效度分析与相关性分析,并评价慢性病患者的赋能、自我效能及心理一致感情况。研究结果中文版慢性病患者赋能量表总Cronbach' s α系数为0.95,各维度Cronbach's α系数范围0.694~0.877;量表分半信度为0.93,重测信度0.921,平均内容效度0.950,各维度得分与总分相关系数范围0.875~0.959,以自我效能感量表作为效标的效标效度为0.678;主轴因子分解法提取6个公因子,删除三个不归类任何因子的条目后,累积方差贡献率54.50%。社区慢性病患者自我效能感总分分布为22.04±6.17分,按评分标准属中等偏上水平。社区慢性病患者赋能总分的分布为122.83±27.20分,其中“知识获取与理解”维度和“自我认知”维度得分最高。不同文化程度、职业、最长病程、婚姻状况下的慢性病患者在赋能总分及各维度得分间的差别均有显著性差异(P0.05):社区慢性病患者自我效能总分与赋能总分及各个维度呈正相关,相关系数0.514-0.690,差异有统计学意义。结论1.汉化修订后的中文版慢性病赋能量表共44个条目,6个维度:生活态度,自我认知,知识获取,自我管理,自主决策,赋能他人。2.中文版慢性病赋能量表在信度上具有良好的量表内部一致性与重测信度;量表的效度分析结果表明:中文版慢性病赋能量表具有较好的内容效度、内部相关性、效标关联效度与结构效度。3.中文版慢性病赋能量表从编制过程和测评维度方面更强调评价社区慢性病患者在疾病管理过程中的主观能动性,同时也更适合我国社区慢性病人群赋能水平的评估。4.我国社区中老年慢性病患者赋能水平居中,在表达疾病感受、与其他病友分享疾病管理经验方面有待提高,我国针对慢性病人群制定的医疗保险政策在社区慢性病人群中知晓率较低,提示医护人员在社区慢性病患者护理过程中应针对性宣教,以提高患者赋能水平。
[Abstract]:Objective 1. Introduce and translate the chronic disease empowerment scale, and evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. 2. To assess the empowerment level of the elderly and chronic patients in Chinese community, and to explore the correlation between empowerment and self-efficacy and psychological congruence. Methods after obtaining the authorizations of the original author, the Brislin translation model was used to complete the Sinicization of the scale. The data of 273 elderly patients with chronic diseases in 4 communities in Guangzhou were collected by convenient sampling method, and the data were recorded by SPSS 19.0 software. To analyze the reliability and validity of the scale and to evaluate the status of empowerment, self-efficacy and psychological identity in patients with chronic diseases. Results the total Cronbachs 伪 coefficient of the Chinese version of chronic disease empowerment scale was 0.95, the Cronbachs 伪 coefficient range of each dimension was 0.6940.87, the split-half reliability of the scale was 0.93, the test-retest reliability was 0.921, the average content validity was 0.950, and the correlation coefficient between the scores of each dimension and the total score was 0.950. The validity of self-efficacy scale was 0.678. The main axis factor decomposition method was used to extract 6 common factors. After deleting three items that do not classify any factors, the cumulative variance contribution rate is 54.50. The total score of self-efficacy of chronic patients in community was 22.04 卤6.17. The total score of empowerment of chronic patients in community was 122.83 卤27.20, in which the dimensions of "knowledge acquisition and understanding" and "self-cognition" had the highest scores. There were significant differences in the total score of empowerment and the score of each dimension between the patients with chronic diseases under different education level, occupation, longest course of disease and marital status (P0.05): the total score of self-efficacy of chronic patients in community was positively correlated with the total score of empowerment and each dimension. The correlation coefficient was 0.514-0.690, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion 1. The Chinese version of chronic disease empowerment scale has 44 items, 6 dimensions: life attitude, self-cognition, knowledge acquisition, self-management, autonomous decision-making, empowering others. 2. The Chinese version of chronic disease empowerment scale has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability in terms of reliability, and the validity analysis results show that the Chinese version of chronic disease empowerment scale has good content validity and internal correlation. Correlation validity and structural validity. 3. The Chinese version of chronic disease empowerment scale emphasizes the evaluation of the subjective initiative of chronic disease patients in the process of disease management and is more suitable for the evaluation of the empowerment level of chronic disease population in Chinese community. The empowerment level of middle-aged and elderly patients with chronic diseases in our community is in the middle. It needs to be improved to express the feeling of disease and share the experience of disease management with other patients. The low awareness rate of the medical insurance policy for the chronically ill population in our country suggests that the health care workers should be educated in the process of nursing the patients with chronic diseases in community in order to improve the level of empowerment of the patients.
【学位授予单位】:南方医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R473.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王震;;探索社区家庭医生制度建设[J];中国党政干部论坛;2016年09期
2 蔡孝恒;;习近平全面深化医药卫生体制改革思想初探[J];中共云南省委党校学报;2016年03期
3 曾晶;史慧颖;张昊;;心理一致感的结构及影响因素[J];西南大学学报(社会科学版);2016年03期
4 陈超;邵爽;金光辉;王文季;刘艳丽;陈丽芬;路孝琴;;我国内地社区卫生服务管理研究现状[J];中国全科医学;2016年13期
5 郭丽君;鲍勇;孙炜;刘夏;戴红勤;;社区医务人员对中医“治未病”政策的认知情况及发展建议[J];中国全科医学;2016年01期
6 王丽;常利杰;吴浩;刘丽华;蔺惠芳;;医护绑定式团队中社区护士对慢性病管理的作用[J];中华护理杂志;2015年06期
7 叶启蒙;刘可;卜秀青;张利峰;;跨文化研究中量表的跨文化调适[J];中国实用护理杂志;2014年32期
8 张秀波;李变娥;;脑卒中患者赋能护理评价量表的开发及信度、效度检验[J];中国护理管理;2014年01期
9 秦江梅;张艳春;张丽芳;芮东升;毛璐;王丽坤;吴宁;;典型城市居民慢性病患病率及患者疾病负担分析[J];中国公共卫生;2014年01期
10 孔淑贞;蒋文慧;;慢性病自我管理理论模式及其应用研究进展[J];护理研究;2013年16期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 陈晓云;广州市全科医生规范化培养现状及对策研究[D];南方医科大学;2016年
2 李冰冰;赋能教育对溃疡性结肠炎术后患者生活质量及肛门功能的作用研究[D];天津医科大学;2014年
3 赵红霞;太极拳运动对练习者执行控制的影响:来自ERPs的证据[D];首都体育学院;2013年
4 胡贝贝;糖尿病授权中文简化量表的修订及初步应用研究[D];浙江大学;2010年
,本文编号:2069871
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/linchuangyixuelunwen/2069871.html