一体化正压留置针与普通肝素帽留置针封管的对比研究
发布时间：2018-08-28 15:28
【摘要】：目的:探讨一体化正压留置针与普通肝素帽留置针的单次封管时间及封管难度。方法:将我院综合ICU收治的118例需静脉留置输液针患者随机分为观察组与对照组各59例,对照组采用普通肝素帽留置针输液治疗,观察组采用一体化正压留置针输液治疗,选择3年以上留置针正压封管经验的3名护士评价正压封管时间,选择入院工作1年内且未操作过正压封管的5名护士评价封管难度。结果:观察组单次封管时间(3.9±1.3)min,对照组单次封管时间(2.1±1.1)min,两组比较有显著性差异(P0.01);观察组封管难度评价显著优于对照组(P0.01)。结论:一体化正压留置针的单次封管时间显著低于普通肝素帽留置针的封管时间,且封管难度较低,适合临床推广。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the time and difficulty of single sealing of barotropic indwelling needle and common heparin cap indwelling needle. Methods: a total of 118 patients with intravenous indwelling infusion needle were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group (n = 59) and the control group (n = 59). The control group was treated with conventional heparin cap indwelling needle, and the observation group was treated with integrated positive pressure indwelling needle infusion. Three nurses who had more than 3 years experience of positive pressure sealing with indwelling needle were selected to evaluate the time of positive pressure sealing, and 5 nurses who had not operated positive pressure sealing within one year of admission to hospital were selected to evaluate the difficulty of sealing. Results: the time of single seal in the observation group was (3.9 卤1.3) min, in the control group and (2.1 卤1.1) min, in the control group (P0.01), and the evaluation of the difficulty in the treatment group was significantly better than that in the control group (P0.01). Conclusion: the time of single tube sealing of integrated positive pressure indwelling needle is significantly lower than that of common heparin cap indwelling needle, and the difficulty of sealing tube is lower, which is suitable for clinical application.
【作者单位】： 珠海市中西医结合医院珠海市第二人民医院;
【基金】：珠海市科技计划项目(编号:20161027E030020)
【分类号】：R472
本文编号：2209820
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the time and difficulty of single sealing of barotropic indwelling needle and common heparin cap indwelling needle. Methods: a total of 118 patients with intravenous indwelling infusion needle were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group (n = 59) and the control group (n = 59). The control group was treated with conventional heparin cap indwelling needle, and the observation group was treated with integrated positive pressure indwelling needle infusion. Three nurses who had more than 3 years experience of positive pressure sealing with indwelling needle were selected to evaluate the time of positive pressure sealing, and 5 nurses who had not operated positive pressure sealing within one year of admission to hospital were selected to evaluate the difficulty of sealing. Results: the time of single seal in the observation group was (3.9 卤1.3) min, in the control group and (2.1 卤1.1) min, in the control group (P0.01), and the evaluation of the difficulty in the treatment group was significantly better than that in the control group (P0.01). Conclusion: the time of single tube sealing of integrated positive pressure indwelling needle is significantly lower than that of common heparin cap indwelling needle, and the difficulty of sealing tube is lower, which is suitable for clinical application.
【作者单位】： 珠海市中西医结合医院珠海市第二人民医院;
【基金】：珠海市科技计划项目(编号:20161027E030020)
【分类号】：R472
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 吕妃;杜丽萍;;无针密闭正压接头对PICC输液效果的影响[J];当代护士(中旬刊);2012年11期
，本文编号：2209820
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/linchuangyixuelunwen/2209820.html
最近更新
教材专著
