CT增强检查留置针拔除后两种按压方法效果的比较

发布时间：2019-06-01 07:58

【摘要】：目的:比较CT增强扫描检查留置针拔除后手指按压法和棉球胶布加压按压法的效果。方法:选取2016年12月于我院行CT增强检查中意识清楚、能正确表达、愿意配合、无凝血功能障碍、一次穿刺成功且检查中无对比剂渗漏的1 465例患者,将其随机分为实验组(n=752)和对照组(n=713)。留置针拔除后,实验组采用棉球胶布加压按压法,而对照组采用传统的手指按压法。采用卡方检验比较2种按压法在患者满意度、疼痛等级及出血相关并发症的差异。结果:2组患者年龄、沟通能力、配合程度、凝血功能、血管穿刺难易程度等方面无明显差异。统计分析发现,与手指按压法相比,棉球胶布加压按压法可以提升患者满意度(97.03%vs.90.87,P=0.000),有效降低并发症发生率,中度及以上疼痛发生率(8.37%vs.18.65%,χ~2=33.348,P=0.000),针眼出血发生率(0.93%vs.2.67%,χ~2=6.312,P=0.012),血肿发生率(0.53%vs.1.96%,χ~2=6.181,P=0.013),皮下瘀斑发生率(0.80%vs.2.52%,χ~2=6.772,P=0.009)。结论:CT增强检查留置针拔除后采用棉球胶布加压按压法比手指按压法安全有效、预防按压并发症,而且简单易行,可以提高患者满意度,值得在临床应用中推广。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the effect of finger pressing method and cotton ball tape pressing method after indwelling needle removal by CT enhanced scanning. Methods: a total of 1465 patients with clear consciousness, willing to cooperate, no coagulation dysfunction, successful puncture and no contrast agent leakage were selected in our hospital in December 2016. the results showed that 1465 patients had clear consciousness, could express correctly, were willing to cooperate, had no coagulation dysfunction, and had no leakage of contrast agent in one puncture. The patients were randomly divided into experimental group (n 鈮，

本文编号：2490109