从系谱宗族到实体宗族:明代中后期以来中国宗族的发育与演化——以山东滕阳闵氏宗族为例

发布时间：2017-12-27 03:21

  本文关键词：从系谱宗族到实体宗族:明代中后期以来中国宗族的发育与演化——以山东滕阳闵氏宗族为例　出处：《中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 要素主义 系谱宗族 实体性宗族

【摘要】：以往中国宗族研究多从要素主义角度入手,或者突出若干项因素,或者仅注重一项因素,故有宗族是系谱性还是功能性之争论。前者把系谱当做唯一要素,后者把系谱连同祠堂、族产、组织等理解为构成宗族的诸平等要素。山东滕州闵楼村闵氏宗族自明朝中后期开基以来,在明清两代以迄民初,经历了从系谱宗族到实体性宗族的发育与演化过程。这一过程表明,不同历史阶段,农人在实践不同宗族概念:一种是系谱宗族,一种是实体性宗族(即功能宗族)。对于中国大部分地区的造族运动而言,一般是先造一个系谱宗族,待经济和社会地位等条件具备以后,就赋予其各种功能,从而变成具有实际作用的架构。系谱不应该被简单理解成一项造族因素,因为通过系谱而制造的宗族是完全可以独立
[Abstract]:In the past, Chinese clansmen studies mostly started from the perspective of essentialism, or highlighted a number of factors, or only focused on one factor. The former pedigree as the only elements that the pedigree production organization, together with the ancestral hall, understood as a clan of flat elements. Shandong Tengzhou Min Min Lou clan from the late Ming Dynasty, in the Ming and Qing Dynasties since the two generation until the early Republic of China, from the experience of the development and evolution of the clan pedigree to substantive clan process. This process shows that, at different historical stages, farmers are practicing different clan concepts: one is genealogical clan, the other is an entity clan (that is, functional clan). For most of the ethnic groups in China, a genealogical lineage is usually established before the conditions such as economic and social status are available, which gives them various functions and becomes a practical structure. The genealogy should not be simply understood as a family building factor, because the clan made through the genealogy can be completely independent.
【作者单位】： 青岛大学法学院;
【基金】：2011年度国家社会科学基金项目“16世纪以来黄淮平原上的联宗问题研究”(项目编号:11BZS072)的后续性成果
【分类号】：C951
【正文快照】： 英国人类学家莫里斯·弗里德曼(Maurice Freedman)从功能论的角度理解中国宗族。[1]之后有许多学者跟进,比如,王崧兴、[2-3]裴达礼(Hugh.D.R.Baker)、[4-6]科恩(Myron Cohen)、[7]马丁(Emile Martin Ahern)、[8]波特(M.J.Potter)、[9-10]庄英章、[11]华琛(James Watson)、[12-，

本文编号：1340041