鲜卑起源三说与“东胡后裔”的身份建构

发布时间：2018-03-13 17:28

本文选题：鲜卑起源　切入点：东胡　出处：《内蒙古社会科学(汉文版)》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：鲜卑的族群起源问题,概括起来有服虔“山戎说”、胡广“东胡别种说”和应奉“秦朝亡徒说”等三种说法。看似相互矛盾的鲜卑起源三说,其实拥有着共同的认知基点,即对“鲜卑源自东胡”的一致认同。只是三位作者因为各自的人生际遇,或是论出公台案牍文书,或是执着于疏通经史义理,或是关心华夷互动的现实问题,方才形成偏颇各异的三种说法。此外,起源三说的殊途同归,还反映出了东汉士人在华夷认知意识上的纵深性——“东胡后裔”的身份建构,除了有异于“华夏”外,还有区别于“匈奴”的涵义,而这皆是基于“以夷制夷”的现实需要。
[Abstract]:The origin of Xianbei ethnic group can be summed up in the following three kinds of statements: serving godliness "Shanrong theory", Hu Guang's "Donghu alternative species theory" and "Qin Dynasty deathman theory". The seemingly contradictory three theories of Xianbei origin actually share a common cognitive basis. That is, the consensus on "Xianbei originates from the East Hu." it is only that the three authors, because of their respective life experiences, either discuss the official documents in the case of the Gongtai case, or cling to the principle of historical interpretation of the Classics, or care about the practical problems of the interaction between the Chinese and the foreigners. In addition, the different approaches of the three origination theories also reflect the profound nature of the Eastern Han scholars' cognitive consciousness of Yi in China-the identity construction of "the descendants of East Hu", in addition to being different from the "Huaxia". There is also a difference from the meaning of "Huns", and this is based on the "raze Yi" practical needs.
【作者单位】：宁波大学人文与传媒学院;
【分类号】：K289

【相似文献】