如何认识“民族”和“中华民族”——回顾1939年关于“中华民族是一个”的讨论

发布时间：2018-05-07 23:43

本文选题：中华民族 + 民族　；参考：《中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2012年05期

【摘要】：在1939年《益世报》的《边疆周刊》上,顾颉刚先生在他发表的《中华民族是一个》一文中明确提出:"我们从今以后要绝对郑重使用‘民族’二字,我们对内没有什么民族之分,对外只有一个中华民族!"在这篇文章发表后,在学者中引发了一场争论,特别是费孝通先生明确表示不赞成,认为中国内部存在许多"民族"。近年来,我国学术界也出现了对于56个民族是应当继续称为"民族"还是改称"族群"的争论,甚至有人提出废弃"中华民族"的提法。通过简略地回溯20世纪30年代末的这场关于"中华民族"的讨论,认为这场讨论对于当前关于"民族"定义和是否保留"中华民族"提法的讨论有重要的启示意义。
[Abstract]:In the "Frontier Weekly" of 1939, Mr. Gu Jiegang clearly stated in his article "the Chinese Nation is one": "We must solemnly use the word 'nation' from now on, and we have no distinction for any ethnic group. There is only one Chinese nation! " After the article was published, there was a debate among scholars, especially when Mr. Fei Xiaotong made it clear that there were many "ethnic groups" in China. In recent years, there has also been a debate in Chinese academia about whether 56 ethnic groups should continue to be called "nationalities" or "ethnic groups", and some even put forward the idea of abandoning the term "Chinese nation". Through a brief review of the discussion on the "Chinese nation" in the late 1930s, it is considered that this discussion has important implications for the current discussion on the definition of "nation" and whether to retain the term "Chinese nation".
【作者单位】：北京大学社会学人类学研究所;
【分类号】：C95

【相似文献】